Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

On the visual orientation of random dot Moiré patterns

  • 64 Accesses

Abstract

We studied the orientation perception of dot patterns with Moiré effect. The Moiré effect was achieved by rotating the original patterns over small angles. When the angle was increased the effect disappeared while the characteristics of orientation estimation remained unchanged. For relatively small angles the subjects performance can be described by a model based on the concept of least squared distance axis. For large angles of rotation this model has began to be unsufficient and a more refined model is proposed here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson JA (1983) Cognitive and psychological computation with neural models. IEEE Trans SMC-13:799–815

  2. Glass L (1969) Moiré effect from random dots. Nature 223:578–580

  3. Glass L, Perez R (1973) Perception and random dot interference patterns. Nature 246:360–362

  4. Glass L, Switkes E (1976) Pattern recognition in humans: correlations which cannot be perceived. Perception 5:67–72

  5. Heath RA (1981) A tandem random walk model for psychological discrimination. Br J Math Stat Psychol 34:76–92

  6. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 160:106–154

  7. Koenderink JJ (1984) The structure of images. Biol Cybern 50:363–370

  8. Lánskÿ P, Yakimoff N, Radil T (1987) On visual orientation of dot patterns. Biol Cybern 56:389–396

  9. Lánský P, Yakimoff N, Radil T (1988) Influence of local orientation cues on estimating the tilt of two-dimensional patterns. Spat Vision 3:9–13

  10. Nakayama K, Tyler CW (1976) Local versus global factors in the perception of orientation. J Opt Soc Am 66:1090

  11. Prazdny K (1984) On the perception of glass patterns. Perception 13:469–478

  12. Prazdny K (1986) Some new phenomena in the perception of glass patterns. Biol Cybern 53:153–158

  13. Smits JTS, Vos PG (1986) A model for the perception of curves in dot figures: the role of local salience of “virtual lines”. Biol Cybern 54:407–416

  14. Stevens K (1978) Computation of locally parallel structure. Biol Cybern 29:19–28

  15. Vogels R, Orban GA (1985) The effect of practice on the oblique effect in line orientation judgment. Vision Res 25:1679–1687

  16. Vogels R, Orban GA (1987) Illusory contour orientation discrimination. Vision Res 27:453–467

  17. Ward R, Casco C, Watt RJ (1985) The location of noisy visual stimuli. Can J Psychol 39:387–399

  18. Watt RJ, Morgan MJ, Ward RM (1983) The use of different cues in vernier activity. Vision Res 23:991–995

  19. Yakimoff N (1981) Does assignment of orientation to dot patterns reveal optimization processes in the visual system? Biol Cybern 42:39–43

  20. Yakimoff N, Mitrani L (1979) A concept of perceived orientation. Percept Psychophys 26:327–330

  21. Yakimoff N, Lánský P, Radil T (1988) Systematic error in estimating orientation of random dot patterns. Activ Nerv Super (in press)

  22. Yodogawa E (1985) A quantitative measure of perceived orientation strength of dot patterns. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on System, Man and Cybernetics, pp 584–588

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lánsky, P., Mates, J. & Radil, T. On the visual orientation of random dot Moiré patterns. Biol. Cybern. 60, 213–219 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207289

Download citation

Keywords

  • Small Angle
  • Large Angle
  • Distance Axis
  • Refined Model
  • Visual Orientation