Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Recognition of Leuconostoc oenos strains by the use of DNA restriction profiles

  • 17 Accesses

  • 25 Citations


The chromosome of 41 Leuconostoc oenos strains obtained from collections in different countries was analysed with the aim of differentiating the strains. Pulsed field electrophoresis (TAFE) was used to separate large DNA fragments created by the restriction enzymes NotI, SfiI and ApaI, which specifically recognize guanines or cytosines. The genomic DNA of 11 strains was analysed initially with NotI and only four different restriction profiles were observed. The genome size ranged from 1.8 to 2.1 megabase pairs (Mbp). Constant field electrophoresis applied to DNA treatment with 19 different restriction enzymes showed that the size of the fragments obtained increased proportionally to the percentage G+C present at the site of restriction. EcoRI and HindIII profiles revealed that the zone between 9 and 23 kbp allowed differentiation of the strains tested. Thus, the 41 strains fell into 30 restriction groups using only two enzymes. Hybridization with a non-radioactive DNA probe coding for 16S rRNA revealed that there were two 16S genes on the chromosome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Beelman RB, Keen RM, Banner MJ, King SW (1982) Interactions between wine yeasts and malolactic bacteria under wine conditions. Dev Ind Microbiol 23:107–122

  2. Buchrieser C, Brosch R, Rocourt J (1991) Use of pulsed field gel electrophoresis to compare large fragments of Listeria monocytogenes belonging to serogroup 1/2 and 3. Int J Food Microbiol 14:297–304

  3. Cantor CR, Smith CL, Mathew MK (1988) Pulsed field gel electrophoresis of very large DNA molecules. Annu Rev Biophys Chem 17:287–304

  4. Cavin JF (1988) Etude de la flore lactique des vins et de la fermentation malolactique. Aspects physiologiques et technologiques. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France

  5. Cavin JF, Schmitt P, Arias A, Lin J, Divies C (1988) Plasmid profiles in Leuconostoc spp. Microbiol Aliments Nutr 6:55–62

  6. Collins MD, Rodriguez U, Ash C, Aguire M, Farrow JAE, Martinez-Murcia A, Phillips BA, Williams AM, Wallbanks S (1991) Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Lactobacillus and related lactic acid bacteria as determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 77:5–12

  7. Garvie EI, Farrow JAE (1980) The differentiation of Leuconostoc oenos from non acidophilic species of Leuconostoc, and the identification of five strains from American Type Culture Collection. Am J Enol Vitic 31:154–157

  8. Iglesias A, Ceglowski P, Trautner TA (1983) Plasmid transformation in Bacillus subtilis, effects of the insertion of B. subtilis rRNA genes into plasmids. Mol Gen Genet 192:149–155

  9. Krawiec S, Riley M (1990) Organization of the bacterial chromosome. Microbiol Rev 54:502–539

  10. Le Bourgeois P, Mata M, Ritzenthaler P (1989) Genome comparison of Lactococcus strains by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 59:65–70

  11. Martinez-Murcia AJ, Collins MD (1990) A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Leuconostoc based on the reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 70:73–84

  12. McClelland M, Jones R, Patel Y, Nelson M (187) Restriction endonucleases for pulsed field mapping of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 15:5985–6005

  13. Pebay M, Colmin C, Guedon G, Degasperi C, Decaris B, Simonet JM (1992) Detection of intraspecific DNA polymorphism in Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus by a homologous rDNA probe. Res Microbiol 143:37–46

  14. Ramos MS, Harlander SK (1990) DNA fingerprinting of lactococci used in dairy fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 34:368–374

  15. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.

  16. Southern EM (1975) Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503–517

  17. Tanskanen EI, Tulloch DL, Hillier AJ, Davidson BE (1990) Pulsed field gel electrophoresis of SmaI digests of lactococcal genomic DNA, a novel method of strain identification. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:3105–3111

  18. Wibowo D, Fleet GH, Lee TH, Eschenbruch RE (1988) Factors affecting the induction of malolactic fermentation in red wines with Leuconostoc oenos. J Appl Bacteriol 64:421–428

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Correspondence to: C. Diviès

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamoureux, M., Prévost, H., Cavin, J.F. et al. Recognition of Leuconostoc oenos strains by the use of DNA restriction profiles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 39, 547–552 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00205049

Download citation


  • Cytosine
  • Guanine
  • Genome Size
  • Pulse Field
  • Restriction Group