Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Stimulus sequence effects on human express saccades described by a Markov model

  • 32 Accesses

  • 5 Citations

Abstract

Express saccades predominantly occur in experiments employing the gap paradigm where the target onset is separated from the fixation point offset by a blank period. Their relative frequency is distinctly influenced by catch trials (i.e. trials without a saccadic target) mixed into the stream of regular target trials. Generalizing this concept for other stimulus uncertainties (direction, amplitude), we found that the preparation time of a saccade depends on both the type of uncertainty used and the sequence of trial type (e.g., target vs catch, left vs right) in the experiment. This stimulus sequence effect is most prominent for catch trials. A similar but less pronounced effect can still be observed in the case of direction uncertainty but not in that of amplitude uncertainty. A two-state Markov process model is proposed which is based on the dichotomy of express and regular saccades in the gap paradigm. According to this model the actual state of the saccadic system, which determines the type of saccade just in preparation, depends on the “trial history”. The implications for models of saccade programming are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Becker W, Jürgens, R (1979) An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Res 19:967–983

  2. Boch R, Fischer B, Ramsperger E (1984) Express saccades of the monkey: reaction time versus intensity, size, duration and eccentricity of their targets. Exp Brain Res 55:223–231

  3. Deubel H (1984) Wechselwirkung von Sensorik und Motorik bei sakkadischen Augenbewegungen. Thesis, Technical University Munich

  4. Deubel H, Wolf W, Hauske G (1986) Adaptive gain control of saccadic eye movements. Hum Neurobiol 5:245–253

  5. Falmagne JC, Cohen SP, Dwivedi A (1975). Two-choice reactions as an ordered memory scanning process. In:Rabbit P, Dornic S (eds) Attention and performance V. Academic Press, New York, pp 296–344

  6. Fischer B (1987) The preparation of visually guided saccades. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 106:1–35

  7. Fischer B, Boch R (1983) Saccadic eye movements after extremely short reaction times in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res 260:21–26

  8. Fischer B, Breitmeyer B (1987) Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements. Neurophysiologica 25:73–83

  9. Fischer B, Ramsperger E (1984) Human express saccades:extremely short reaction times of goal directed eye movements. Exp Brain Res 57:191–195

  10. Fischer B, Ramsperger E (1986) Human express saccades:effects of randomization and daily practice. Exp Brain Res 64:569–578

  11. Fischer B, Weber H (1990) Saccadic reaction times of dyslexic and age-matched subjects. Perception 19:805–818

  12. Fischer B, Weber H (1993) Express saccades and visual attention. Behav Brain Sci (in press)

  13. Holst E von, Mittelstaedt H (1950) Das Reafferenzprinzip. Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie. Naturwissenschaften 37:464–476

  14. Iwaski S (1990) Facilitation of reaction times with gap paradigm:comparison of manual and saccadic responses. Ergonomics 33:833–850

  15. Jüttner M, Wolf W (1992) Occurrence of human express saccade depends on stimulus uncertainty and stimulus sequence. Exp Brain Res 89:678–681

  16. Kowler E, Martins AJ, Pavel M (1984) The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control. IV. Anticipatory smooth eye movements depend on prior target motions. Vision Res 24:197–210

  17. McLachlan GJ, Basford KE (1988) Mixture models. Dekker, New York

  18. Mayfrank L, Mobashery M, Kimmig H, Fischer B (1986) The role of fixation in the occurrence of express saccades in man. Eur Arch Psychiatr Neurol Sci 235:269–275

  19. Robinson DA (1973) Models of the saccadic eye movement control system. Kybernetik 14:71, 73

  20. Robinson DA (1975) Oculomotor control signals. In:Lennerstrand G, Bach-Y-Rita P (eds) Basic mechanisms of ocular motility and their clinical implications. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 337–374

  21. Saslow MG (1967) Latency for saccadic eye movement. J. Opt Soc Am[A] 57:1024–1029

  22. Vossius G (1960) Das System der Augenbewegung. Z Biol 112:27–57

  23. Young LR, Stark L (1963) Variable feedback experiments testing a sampled data model for eye tracking movements. IEEE Trans Prof Tech Group Hum Factors Electronics 4:38–51

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Werner Wolf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jüttner, M., Wolf, W. Stimulus sequence effects on human express saccades described by a Markov model. Biol. Cybern. 70, 247–253 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00197605

Download citation

Keywords

  • Markov Model
  • Trial Type
  • Catch Trial
  • Target Onset
  • Target Trial