Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Equity and efficiency in non-convex economies

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to consider the following question. Does the presence of increasing returns introduce a fundamental trade-off between equity and efficiency objectives? We show that if the no-envy notion of Foley (1967) is taken as the equity criterion and Pareto optimality as the efficiency criterion, then the answer is yes; there exist economies with increasing returns and well-behaved preferences (and no agent-specific inputs) in which there do not exist any envy-free and Pareto optimal allocations. We also propose a weakening of the no-envy criterion and prove that this weaker equity notion is compatible with Pareto optimality in general non-convex economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Beato P, Mas-Colell A (1985) On marginal cost pricing with given tax-subsidy rules. J Econ Theory 37: 356–365

  2. Brown D.J, Heal GM (1979) Equity efficiency and increasing returns. Rev Econ Stud 46: 471–485

  3. Brown DJ, Heal GM (1985) The optimality of regulated pricing: a general equilibrium analysis. In: Aliprantis CD, Burkinshaw O, Rothman NJ (eds) Adv Equilibrium Theory. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer

  4. Cornet B (1988) General equilibrium theory and increasing returns (special issue) J Math Econ 17

  5. Daniel T (1978) Pitfalls in the theory of fairness-comment. J Econ Theory 19: 561–564

  6. Diamantaras D (1989) On equity with public goods (mimeo, Temple University)

  7. Feldman A, Kirman A (1974) Fairness and envy. Amer Econ Rev 64: 995–1005

  8. Foley D (1967) Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale Econ Essays 7: 45–98

  9. Guesnerie R (1975) Pareto optimality in non-convex economies. Econometrica 43: 1–29

  10. Hurwicz L, Reiter S (1973) On the boundedness of the feasibility set without convexity assumptions. Int Econ Rev 14: 580–586

  11. Moulin H, Thomson W (1988) Can everyone benefit from growth? Two difficulties. J Math Econ 17: 339–345

  12. Pazner E, Schmeidler D (1974) A difficulty in the concept of fairness. Rev Econ Stud 41: 441–443

  13. Pazner E, Schmeidler, D, (1978) Egalitarian equivalent allocations: a new concept of economic equity. Quart J Econ 92: 671–687

  14. Scarf HE (with the collaboration of Hansen T) (1973) Computat Econ Equilibria, Yale University Press, New Haven

  15. Svensson LG (1983) On the existence of fair allocations. Zeitschr Nationalokon 43: 301–308

  16. Thomson W (1989) Equity concepts in economics (mimeo, University of Rochester)

  17. Varian H (1974) Equity, envy and efficiency. J Econ Theory 9: 63–91

  18. Vohra R (1988) Optimal regulation under fixed rules for income distribution. J Econ Theory 45: 65–84

  19. Vohra R (1990) On the inefficiency of two-part tariffs. Rev Econ Stud 57: 415–438

Download references

Author information

Additional information

I am indebted to W. Thomson for many helpful discussions. Thanks are also due to D. Diamantaras and B. Dutta and to participants of seminars at Columbia University, University of Bielefeld, University of Alicante and Cornell University for comments on an earlier draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vohra, R. Equity and efficiency in non-convex economies. Soc Choice Welfare 9, 185–202 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192877

Download citation

Keywords

  • Optimal Allocation
  • Pareto Optimality
  • Efficiency Criterion
  • Pareto Optimal Allocation
  • Equity Criterion