, Volume 118, Issue 2, pp 219–223 | Cite as

Size-fractionation of natural phytoplankton communities in nutrient bioassay studies

  • Judith L. Lane
  • Charles R. Goldman


phytoplankton size-fractionation bioassay nannoplankton netplankton algae 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Costella, A. C., K. S. Shortreed & J. G. Stockner, 1979. Phytoplankton fractionation studies in Great Central Lake, British Columbia: a nutrient-enriched sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) nursery lake. Fish. & mar. Serv. techn. Rep. No. 880.Google Scholar
  2. Eppley, R. W. & P. R. Sloan, 1966. Growth rates of marine phytoplankton: Correlation with light absorption by cell chlorophyll a. Physiol. Plant. 19: 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eppley, R. W. & W. H. Thomas, 1969. Comparisons of half-saturation constants for growth and nitrate uptake of marine phytoplankton. J. Phycol. 5: 375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Friebele, E. S., D. L. Correll & M. A. Faust, 1978. Relationship between phytoplankton cell size and the rate of orthophosphate uptake: in situ observations of an estuarine population. Mar. Biol. 45: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gelin, C., 1975. Nutrients, biomass and primary productivity of nannoplankton in eutrophic Lake Vombsjön, Sweden. OIKOS 26: 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerhart, D. Z. & G. E. Likens, 1975. Enrichment experiments for determining nutrient limitation: Four methods compared. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20: 649–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldman, C. R., 1963. The measurement of primary productivity and limiting factors in freshwater with carbon-14. In M. S. Doty (ed.), Proceedings of the conference on primary productivity measurement, marine and freshwater, Univ. Hawaii, 1961. U.S. Atomic Energy Commn., Rep. TID-7633: 103–113.Google Scholar
  8. Goldman, C. R., 1964. Primary productivity and micro-nutrient limiting factors in some North American and New Zealand lakes. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 15: 365–374.Google Scholar
  9. Goldman, C. R., 1978. The use of natural phytoplankton populations in bioassay. Mitt. int. Ver. Limnol. 21: 364–377.Google Scholar
  10. Goldman, C. R., 1981. Lake Tahoe: two decades of change in a nitrogen deficient oligotrophic lake. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 21: 45–70.Google Scholar
  11. Kalff, J., 1972. Netplankton and nannoplankton production and biomass in a north temperate zone lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17: 712–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lane, J. L., 1983. The responses of different size classes of phytoplankton to nutrient enrichment in oligotrophic lakes. M. S. Thesis, Univ. California, Davis 170 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Larson, D. W., 1972. Temperature, transparency, and phytoplankton productivity in Crater Lake, Oregon. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17: 410–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lean, D. R. S., 1976. Phosphorus kinetics in lake water: influence of membrane filter pore size and low-pressure filtration. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 33: 2800–2804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malone, T. C., 1980. Algal size. In I. Morris (ed.), The Physiological Ecology of Phytoplankton. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Lond., 625 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, J. H., 1970. Phytoplankton-zooplankton relationships in Naragensett Bay, 4. The seasonal importance of grazing. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15: 413–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moss, B., 1972. The influence of environmental factors on the distribution of freshwater algae: an experimental study—1. Introduction and the influence of calcium concentration. J. Ecol. 60: 917–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paerl, H. W., 1977. Nannoplankton vs. netplankton photosynthetic and heterotrophic activities in Fijian waters of the South Pacific Ocean, Lau-Tonga. Bull. 17, The Royal Society of New Zealand, Wellington.Google Scholar
  19. Porter, K. G., 1977. The plant-animal interface in freshwater ecosystems. Am. Sci. 65: 159–170.Google Scholar
  20. Sherr, E. B., B. F. Sherr, T. Berman & J. J. McCarthy, 1982. Differences in nitrate and ammonia uptake components of a phytoplankton population. J. of Plankton Research 4: 961–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Williams, R. B., 1964. Division rates of salt marsh diatoms in relation to salinity and cell size. Ecology 45: 877–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith L. Lane
    • 1
  • Charles R. Goldman
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Environmental Studies, Institute of EcologyUniversity of California — DavisU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations