Skip to main content

Centrohelida and Other Heliozoan-Like Protists

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of the Protists

Abstract

The Centrohelida has arisen through the dissolution of the Heliozoa and the gradual removal of morphologically similar, but ultrastructurally and genetically distinct taxa from the group. The taxonomy of these other heliozoan-like protists is still largely influx, as are the groups within the Centrohelida. Centrohelida and heliozoan-like protists are heterotrophic, free-living species that are found in most aquatic benthic environments where they feed on bacteria and other protists, including algae. Morphologically the cells are conspicuous, generally round in shape with eye-catching raylike axopodia. They can be found in habitats that represent a wide range of temperatures and salinities, including extreme environments. Most are free floating, but some attach to substrates by a stalk. Interest in the heliozoan-like protists (“sun animalcules”) is largely in regard to cell biology. Their size (some can be 500 μm in diameter) and axopodial structure have made them useful subjects for biochemical and ultrastructural studies of microtubules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adl, S. M., Simpson, A. G. B., Farmer, M. A., Andersen, R. A., Anderson, O. R., Barta, J. R., Bowser, S. S., Brugerolle, G., Fensome, R. A., Fredericq, S., James, T. Y., Karpov, S., Kugrens, P., Krug, J., Lane, C. E., Lewis, L. A., Lodge, J., Lynn, D. H., Mann, D. G., McCourt, R. M., Mendoza, L., Moestrup, O., Mozley-Standridge, S. E., Nerad, T. A., Shearer, C. A., Smirnov, A. V., Spiegel, F. W., & Taylor, F. J. R. (2005). The new higher level classification of eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of protists. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 52(5), 399–451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adl, S. M., Simpson, A. G. B., Lane, C. E., Lukeš, J., Bass, D., Bowser, S. S., Brown, M. W., Burki, F., Dunthorn, M., Hampl, V., Heiss, A., Hoppenrath, M., McManus, H., Mitchell, E. A., Mozley-Stanridge, S. E., Parfrey, L. W., Pawlowski, J., Rueckert, S., Shadwick, L., Schoch, C. L., Smirnov, A., & Spiegel, F. W. (2012). The revised classification of eukaryotes. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 59(5), 429–514.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral Zettler, L. A., Messerli, M. A., Laatsch, A. D., Smith, P. J. S., & Sogin, M. L. (2000). From genes to genomes: Beyond biodiversity in Spain’s Rio Tinto. Biological Bulletin, 204, 205–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, O. R. (1988). Comparative protozoology: Ecology, physiology, life history. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arikawa, M., Saito, A., Omura, G., Khan, S. M. M. K., Suetomo, Y., Kakuta, S., & Suzaki, T. (2006). Ca2+-dependent in vitro contractility of a precipitate isolated from an extract of the heliozoon Actinophrys sol. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton, 63(2), 57–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bardele, C. F. (1972). Cell cycle, morphogenesis and ultrastructure in the pseudoheliozoan Clathrulina elegans. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung, 130, 219–242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bardele, C. F. (1975). The fine structure of the centrohelidan heliozoan Heterophrys marina. Cell Tissue Research, 161, 85–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, D., Chao, E. E.-Y., Nikolaev, S., Yabuki, A., Ishida, K., Berney, C., Pakzad, U., Wylezich, C., & Cavalier-Smith, T. (2009). Phylogeny of novel naked filose and reticulose cercozoa: Granofilosea cl.n. and Proteomyxidea revised. Protist, 160, 75–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bĕlař, K. (1923). Untersuchungen an Actinophrys sol Ehrenberg. I. Die Morphologie des Formwechels. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 46, 1–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugerolle, G., & Mignot, J.-P. (1983). Caractéristiques ultrastructurales de l’hélioflagelle Tetradimorpha Hsiung et lur intérêt pour l’étude Phylétique des héliozoaires. Journal of Protozoology, 30(3), 473–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugerolle, G., & Mignot, J.-P. (1984). The cell characters of two helioflagellates related to the centroheliolian lineage: Dimorpha and Tetradimorpha. Origins of Life, 13(314), 305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burki, F., Inagaki, Y., Bråte, J., Archibald, J. M., Keeling, P. J., Cavalier-Smith, T., Sakaguchi, M., Hashimoto, T., Horak, A., Kumar, S., Klaveness, D., Jakobsen, K. S., Pawlowski, J., & Shalchian-Tabrizi, K. (2009). Large-scale phylogenomic analyses reveal that two enigmatic protest lineages, Telonemia and Centroheliozoa, are related to photosynthetic chromalveolates. Genome Biology and Evolution, 1, 231–238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, J., & Cachon, M. (1978). Sticholonche zanclea Hertwig. A reinterpretation of its phylogenetic position based upon new observations on its ultrastructure. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 120, 148–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, J., & Cachon, M. (1984). Various effects induced by chemical microtubule inhibitors and neurodrugs on the microtubular system of the heliozoan Sticholonche zanclea. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 128, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, J., Cachon, M., Tilney, L. G., & Tilney, M. (1977). Movement by interaction between the dense material at the end of microtubules and non-actin microfilaments in Sticholonche zanclea. Journal of Cell Biology, 72, 314–338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith, T., & Chao, E. E. (2003). Molecular phylogeny of centrohelid heliozoa, a novel lineage of bikont eukaryotes that arose by ciliary loss. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 56, 387–396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalier-Smith, T., & von der Heyden, S. (2007). Molecular phylogeny, scale evolution and taxonomy of centrohelid heliozoa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 44, 1186–1203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cienkowsky, L. (1876). Über einige Rhizopoden und verwandte Organismen. Arch Mikroskop Anat, 12, 15–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L. A. (1975). Studies on the actinopods Heterophrys marina and Ciliophrys marina: Energetics and structural analysis of their contractile axopodia, general ultrastructure and phylogenetic relationships. PhD thesis, University of California at Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L. A. (1976). Ultrastructure of membrane attachment sites of the extrusomes of Ciliophrys marina and Heterophrys marina (Actinopoda). Cell Tissue Research, 170, 353–365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dustin, P. (1978). Microtubules. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edds, K. (1975). Motility in Echinosphaerium nucleofilum. II. Cytoplasmic contractility and its molecular basis. Journal of Cell Biology, 66, 156–164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Febvre-Chevalier, C. (1973a). Hedraiophrys hovassei nov. gen., nov. sp. Morphologie, biologie et cytologie. Protistologica, 9, 503–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre-Chevalier, C. (1973b). Un nouveau type d’association des microtubules axopodiaux chez les héliozoaires. Protistologica, 9, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre-Chevalier, C. (1975). Étude cytologique de Gymnosphaera albida, Sasski 1894, (Héliozoaire Centrohélidié). Protistologica, 11, 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre-Chevalier, C. (1981). Preliminary study of the motility processes in the stalked heliozoan Actinocoryne contractilis. Biosystems, 14, 337–343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Febvre-Chevalier, C. (1982). Revision of the taxonomy of the heliozoans with attention to electron microscopical criteria. Annales de l’Institut Océanographique de Paris, 58(S), 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre-Chevalier, C. (1985). Class Heliozoea Haeckel. In J. J. Lee, S. H. Hunter, & E. C. Bovee (Eds.), An illustrated guide to the protozoa (pp. 302–338). Kansas: Society of Protozoologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre-Chevalier, C. (1990). Phylum Actinopoda: Class Heliozoa. In L. Margulis, J. O. Corliss, M. Melkonian, & D. Chapman (Eds.), Handbook of protoctista (pp. 347–362). Boston: Jones & Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre-Chevalier, C., & Febvre, J. (1980). Cytophysiologie de la motilité chez un héliozoaire pédonculé. Paris: Film SFRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre-Chevalier, C., & Febvre, J. (1984). Axonemal microtubules in Cienkowskya mereschkovskyi and a revision of heliozoan taxonomy. Origins of Life, 13, 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Febvre-Chevalier, C., Febvre, J., Bilbaut, A., Bone, Q. (1983, June). The ionic basis of the electrical activity associated with contraction in Actinocoryne contractilis Febv-Chev., (Heliozoa). Comparison with electrophysiological data from other protista. 5th International Meeting of the Society for Evolutionary Protistology, Banyuls-sur-Mer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Febvre-Chevalier, C., Bilbaut, A., Bone, Q., & Febvre, J. (1986). Sodium-calcium action potential associated with contraction in the heliozoan Actinocoryne contractilis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 122, 177–192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E. (1866). Generelle Morphologie der Organismen (Vol. 2, p. 462). Berlin: G. Reimer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, M. (1913). Rhizopoda. In G. Fischer (Ed.), Handwörterbuch der Naturwissenschaften (Vol. 8, pp. 422–446). Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, K., & Patterson, D. J. (1982). Pseudopod formation and membrane production during prey capture by a heliozoan (feeding by Actinophrys II). Cell Motility, 2, 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakuta, S., & Suzaki, T. (2008). Ca(2+)- and glycoconjugates-dependent prey capture in the heliozoon Actinophrys sol. European Journal of Protistology, 44(3), 163–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn, A. (1926). Morphologie der Tiere in Bildern. In Protozoen (Vol. 1, pp. 107–272). Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonov, M. M. (2010). Heliozoans (Heliozoa, Sarcodina, Protista) of fresh and marine waters of the European part of Russia: species composition, morphology, and distribution. Inland Water Biology, 3(4), 344–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbach, M., Hausmann, K., & Patterson, D. J. (1983). Ultrastructural study on the food vacuole cycle of a heliozoan (feeding by Actinophrys III). Protoplasma, 115, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, M., Quinlan, R. A., Hoffman, E. J., & Luduena, R. F. (1983). Identification and characterization of axopodial tubulins from Echinosphaerium nucleofilum. European Journal of Cell Biology, 31, 5–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignot, J. P. (1979). Etude ultrastructurale de la pédogamie chez Actinophrys sol (Héliozoaire). La division programique. Protistologica, 15, 387–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikrjukov, K. A. (1996a). Revision of the genera and species composition of lower Centroheliozoa I. Family Heterophryidae Poche. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 147, 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikrjukov, K. A. (1996b). Revision of the genera and species composition of lower Centroheliozoa II. Family Raphidiophryidae n. fam. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 147, 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikrjukov, K. A. (1998). On the biology of the Heliozoa: The origin of radial forms in the benthic sarcodines. Russian Journal of Zoology, 2, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikrjukov, K. A. (1999). Taxonomic revision of scale-bearing Heliozoon-like amoebae (Pompholyxophryidae, Rotosphaerida). Acta Protozoologica, 38, 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikrjukov, K. A. (2000a). Taxonomy and phylogeny of Heliozoa. I. The order Desmothoracida Hertwig et Lesser, 1874. Acta Protozoologica, 39, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikrjukov, K. A. (2000b). Taxonomy and phylogeny of Heliozoa. II. The order Dimorphida Siemensma, 1991 (Cercomondadea classis n.): Diversity and relatedness with Cercomonads. Acta Protozoologica, 39, 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikrjukov, K. A., & Patterson, D. J. (2001). Taxonomy and phylogeny of Heliozoa. III. Actinophryids. Acta Protozoologica, 40, 2–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikrjukov, K. A., Siemensma, F. J., & Patterson, D. J. (2000). Phylum Heliozoa. In J. J. Lee, G. F. Leedale, & P. Bradbury (Eds.), The illustrated guide to protozoa (2nd ed., pp. 860–871). Lawrence: Society of Protozoologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaev, S. I., Berney, C., Fahrni, J. F., Bolivar, I., Polet, s., Mylnikov, A. P., Aleshin, V. V., Petrov, N. B., & Pawlowski, J. (2004). The twilight of Heliozoa and the rise of Rhizaria, an emerging supergroup of amoeboid eukaryotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 8066–8071.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ockleford, C. D., & Tucker, J. B. (1973). Growth, breakdown, repair and rapid contraction of microtubular azopodia in the heliozoa Actinophrys sol Ehrenberg, 1830. Microbios, 26, 165–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packroff, G. (2000). Protozooplankton in acidic mining lakes with special respect to ciliates. Hydrobiologia, 433, 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, D. J., & Dürrschmidt, M. (1987). Selective retention of chloroplasts by algivorous Heliozoa: Fortuitous chloroplast symbiosis? European Journal of Protistology, 23, 51–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, D. J., & Hausmann, K. (1981). Feeding by Actinophrys sol (Protista Heliozoa): 1. Light microscopy. Microbios, 31, 39–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penard, E. (1904). Les Héliozoaires d’eau douce (pp. 1–341). Genève: Henry Kündig.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett-Heaps, J. D. (1969). The evolution of the mitotic apparatus. An attempt at comparative ultrastructural cytology in dividing plant cells. Cytobios, 1, 257–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R. W., & Coats, D. W. (1999). The feeding ecology of Actinophrys sol (Sarcodina:Heliozoa) in Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 46(5), 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, H. (1968). Heliozoa. In F. Dahl (Ed.), Die Tierwelt Deutschlands (Vol. 56, pp. 3–174). Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. E., & Shigenaka, Y. (1970). Microtubules in the heliozoan axopodium. II. Rapid degradation by cupric and nickelous ions. Journal of Ultrastructure Research, 31, 356–374.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. E., Philaja, D. J., & Shigenka, Y. (1970). Microtubules in the heliozoan axopodium. I. The gardion hypthesis of allosterism in structural proteins. Journal of Ultrastructure Research, 39, 7–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaguchi, M., Hausmann, K., & Suzaki, T. (1998). Food capture and adhesion by the heliozoon Actinophrys sol. Protoplasma, 203(3–4), 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., & Patterson, D. J. (1986). Analysis of heliozoan interrelationships: An example of the potentials and limitations of ultrastructural approaches to the study of protistan phylogeny. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 227, 325–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzaki, T., Shigenaka, Y., Watanabe, S., & Toyohara, A. (1980). Food capture and ingestion in the large heliozoan Echinosphaerium nucleofilum. Journal of Cell Science, 42, 61–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilney, L. G. (1971). How microtubule patterns are generated. The relative importance of nucleation and bridging of microtubules in the formation of the axoneme of Raphidiophrys. Journal of Cell Biology, 51, 837–854.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tilney, L. G., & Byers, B. (1969). Studies on the microtubules in heliozoa. V. Factors controlling the organization of microtubules in the axonemal pattern in Echinosphaerium (Actinosphaerium) nucleofilum. Journal of Cell Biology, 43, 148–165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tilney, L. G., & Porter, K. (1965). Studies on microtubules in heliozoa. I. Fine structure of Actinosphaerium with particular reference to axial rod structure. Protoplasma, 60, 317–344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tregouboff, G. (1953). Classe des Héliozoaires. In P. P. Grassé (Ed.), Traité de Zoologie I (pp. 437–489). Paris: Masson et Cie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkanov, A. (1940). Die Helizoen und Proteomyxien. Artbestand und sonstige kritische Bemerkungen. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 93, 225–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve, F. (1937). Sur la structure de Cienkowskya mereschkovskyi et d’Actinolophus pedunculatus, héliozoaires des eaux saumâtres de Sète. Achives de Zoologie Expérimentale et Générale, 78, 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yabuki, A., Chao, E. E., Ishida, K.-I., & Cavalier-Smith, T. (2012). Microheliella maris (Microhelida ord. n.), and untrastructurally highly distinctive new axopodial protest species and genuse, and the unity of phylum Heliozoa. Protist, 163, 356–388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuelzer, M. (1909). Bau und Entwicklung von Wagnerella borealis Mereschk. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 17, 135–202.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Revised from the original chapter of Colette Febvre-Chevalier

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca J. Gast .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Gast, R.J. (2016). Centrohelida and Other Heliozoan-Like Protists. In: Archibald, J., et al. Handbook of the Protists. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32669-6_28-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32669-6_28-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32669-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32669-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics