Skip to main content
  • 99 Accesses

Synonyms

Advocacy, representativeness, acting on behalf of some individuals, groups, or societies

Definition

Administrative action that purposefully pursues the interests of persons with whom administrators share common bonds.

Introduction

The theory of representative bureaucracy holds that an organization, which mirrors the demographic characteristics of the population it serves will be more responsive to the interests of the public from which it is drawn. This is based on the idea that in a democracy, public administrators should not only mirror the society from which they are drawn, they should also hold values in common with that society. Such a bureaucracy would be more responsive to the people government represents. Following this logic leads to assumption that the presence of minorities in public agencies ensures greater responsiveness to minority concerns.

There is an important distinction between passive and active representation. Passive or “sociological representation”...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brudney JL, Hebert TF, Wright DS (2000) From organizational values to organizational roles. J Public Adm Res Theory 10(3):491–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindera J, Young CD (1998) Representative bureaucracy: the theoretical implications of statistical interaction. Polit Res Q 51(3):655–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiser LR, Wilkins VM, Holland CA (2002) Lipstick and logarithms: gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. Am Polit Sci Rev 96(3):553–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier KJ (1993) Latinos and representative bureaucracy: testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses. J Public Adm Res Theory 3(4):393–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier KJ, England RE (1984) Black representation and educational policy: are they related? Am Polit Sci Rev 78(2):392–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier KJ, Wrinkle RD, Polinard JL (1999) Representative bureaucracy and distributional equity: addressing the hard question. J Polit 61(4):1025–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher FC (1982) Democracy and the public service, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin HF (1967) The concept of representation. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Saidel JR, Loscocco K (2005) Agency leaders, gendered institutions, and representative bureaucracy. Public Adm Rev 65(2):158–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seldon SC, Brudney JL, Edward Kellough J (1998) Bureaucracy as a representative institution: toward a reconciliation of bureaucratic government and democratic theory. Am J Polit Sci 42(3):717–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, FJ (1976) Minority groups in public bureaucracies: are passive and active representation linked? Administration & Society 8:215–217

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan M. Gibran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Gibran, J.M. (2017). Active Representation. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_658-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_658-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics