Skip to main content

Q-Sort Technique

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Synonym

QST

Definition

Q-Sort technique (QST) is defined as “a modified rank-ordering procedure in which stimuli are placed in an order that is significant from the standpoint of a person operating under specified conditions” (Brown 1980, p. 195).

Introduction

Originally developed by physicist-psychologist William Stephenson in the 1930s, QST is the instrumental basis of Q methodology by which the researchers can systematically study “subjectivity” (e.g., a person’s feelings, opinions, perspectives, or preferences) (Brown 1980, 1993, 1996; Stephenson 1953).

With QST, the subjects are assigned the task of sorting (or evaluating) a number of statements by placing a specific number of statements in a predetermined distribution pattern (e.g., a normal distribution) along a spectrum of ranking categories (e.g., “most agreeable” to “most disagreeable”). Then, through correlation and factor analysis on the participants rather than on the variables, the perspectives of the participants can be...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R. (1996). Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 561–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R. (2008). Q methodology. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 700–704). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R., & Ungs, T. D. (1970). Representations and the study of political behaviour: An application of Q technique to reactions to the Kent State incident. Social Science Quarterly, 51, 514–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durning, D. W., & Brown, S. R. (2007). Q methodology and decision making. In G. Morçôl (Ed.), Handbook of decision making (pp. 537–563). New York: CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-S. (2015). Perception of happiness among health-related university students: Q methodological approach. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(S1), 161–168. doi:10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS1/60522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stainton Rogers, R. (1995). Q methodology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinbo HE .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

HE, J., HU, B.Y., FAN, X. (2017). Q-Sort Technique. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_66-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_66-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics