Skip to main content

Theory of Mind

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Synonyms

Belief-desire reasoning; Common-sense psychology; False belief understanding; Folk psychology; Mentalizing; Mindreading; Perspective taking; Social understanding

Definition

Theory of mind is the ability to attribute mental states, such as desires, knowledge, and beliefs, to others in order to predict and explain their behavior.

Introduction

The capacity to predict and explain the behavior of others using mental states, such as desires, knowledge, and beliefs, called “theory of mind” (ToM), has been a topic of extensive theorizing and research within psychology and neuroscience since the late 1970s. Researchers have studied the ability to reason about others’ mental states using a variety of different names: “folk psychology,” “common-sense psychology,” “mentalizing,” “social understanding,” “mindreading,” and, of course, “theory of mind.” Within the field of developmental psychology, researchers have focused primarily on children’s understanding of the relations between...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apperly, I. A. (2011). Mindreaders: The cognitive basis of “Theory of Mind”. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apperly, I. A. (2012). What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. The Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 65, 825–839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Apperly, I. A., Samson, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2009). Studies of adults can inform accounts of theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 45, 190–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Astington, J. W. (2003). Sometimes necessary, never sufficient: False-belief understanding and social competence. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind (pp. 13–38). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astington, J. W., & Baird, J. A. (2005). Introduction: Why language matters. In J. W. Astington & J. A. Baird (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind (pp. 3–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & Bian, L. (2016). Psychological reasoning in infancy. Annual Reviews in Psychology, 67, 159–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bora, E., & Berk, M. (2016). Theory of mind in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 191, 49–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bora, E., Bartholomeusz, C., & Pantelis, C. (2016). Meta-analysis of theory of mind impairment in bipolar disorder. Psychological Medicine, 46, 253–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale, J. I. M., & Lewis, C. (2006). How children develop social understanding. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y. S., Barch, D., & Strube, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of mentalizing impairments in adults with schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40, 602–616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, A. L., & Dunn, J. (1999). Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language and family background: Individual differences and interrelations. Child Development, 70, 853–865.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1978). Beliefs about beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 568–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2013). Silent films and strange stories: Theory of mind, gender and social experiences in middle childhood. Child Development, 84, 989–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2014). Relations between false belief understanding and executive function in early childhood: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 85, 1777–1794.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2016). Family correlates of false belief understanding in early childhood: a meta-analysis. Child Development, doi:10.1111/cdev.12682

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, R.T., White, N., Ensor, R. & Hughes, C. (2016). Theory of mind in middle childhood: Longitudinal associations with executive function and social competence. Developmental Psychology, 52, 758–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1999). New directions in research on children’s relationships and understanding. Social Development, 8, 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., Brown, J., Slomkowski, C., Tesla, C., & Youngblade, L. (1991). Young children’s understanding of other people’s feelings and beliefs: Individual differences and their antecedents. Child Development, 62, 1352–1366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • German, T. P. & Leslie, A. M. (2004). No social construction without meta-representation: Modular mechanisms as a basis for the capacity to acquire an understanding of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 106-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1992). Why the child’s theory of mind really is a theory. Mind & Language, 7, 145–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, C. M., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2003). The influence of language on theory of mind: A training study. Developmental Science, 6, 346–359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (1989). Children and emotion. Oxford: Blackwell Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (1991). The work of the imagination. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 283–304). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, C. M., & Frith, C. D. (2014). The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science, 344, 1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. (2011). Social understanding and social lives: From toddlerhood through to the transition to school. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C., & Devine, R. T. (2015a). A social perspective on theory of mind. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (volume III): Socioemotional processes (pp. 564–609). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C., & Devine, R. T. (2015b). Individual differences in theory of mind from preschool to adolescence: Achievements and directions. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 149–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C., & Dunn, J. (1998). Understanding mind and emotion: Longitudinal associations with mental-state talk between young friends. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1026–1037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. (1991). The theory of mind impairment in autism: Evidence for a modular mechanism of development? In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 63–78). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Wellman, H. M., Tardif, T., & Sabbagh, M. A. (2008). Theory of mind development in Chinese children: A meta-analysis of false belief understanding across cultures and languages. Developmental Psychology, 44, 523–531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, A. R., & Peterson, C. C. (2013). Siblings, theory of mind, and executive functioning in children aged 3–6 years: New longitudinal evidence. Child Development, 84, 1442–1458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Wainwright, R., Das Gupta, M., Fradley, E., & Tuckey, M. (2002). Maternal mind-mindedness and attachment security as predictors of theory of mind understanding. Child Development, 73, 1715–1726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622–646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellicano, E. (2010). The development of core cognitive skills in autism: A 3-year prospective study. Child Development, 81, 1400–1416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J. (2010). Who took the cog out of cognitive science? Mentalism in an era of anti-cognitivism. In P. A. Frensch & R. Schwarzer (Eds.), Cognition and neuropsychology: International perspectives on psychological science (volume 1) (pp. 241–261). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J., & Lang, B. (1999). Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 337–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. C. (2000). Kindred spirits: Influences of siblings’ perspectives on theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 15, 435–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. C., Slaughter, V. P., & Paynter, J. (2007). Social maturity and theory of mind in typically developing children and those on the autism spectrum. Journal Of Child Psychology And Psychiatry, 48, 1243–1250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razza, R. a., & Blair, C. (2009). Associations among false belief understanding, executive function, and social competence: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 332–343.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffman, T., Slade, L., & Crowe, E. (2002). The relation between children’s and mothers’ mental state language and theory of mind understanding. Child Development, 73, 734–751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. (1996). Agency: Its role in mental development. Hove: Erlbaum Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J., Mauthner, N., Sharpet, S., & Tidswell, T. (1991). The “windows task” as a measure of strategic deception in preschoolers and autistic subjects. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 331–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, M., Xu, F., Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Lee, K. (2006). The development of executive functioning and theory of mind. A comparison of Chinese and U.S. preschoolers. Psychological Science, 17, 74–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, V., Imuta, K., Peterson, C. C., & Henry, J. D. (2015). Meta-analysis of theory of mind and peer popularity in the preschool and early school years. Child Development, 86, 1159–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiller, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007). Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size. Social Networks, 29, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M. (1991). From desires to beliefs: Acquisition of a theory of mind. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind: Evolution, development and simulation of everyday mindreading (pp. 19–38). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rory T. Devine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Devine, R.T. (2016). Theory of Mind. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_560-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_560-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics