Skip to main content

Keirsey Temperament Sorter

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • 236 Accesses

Definition

The Keirsey Temperament Sorter II (KTS II) is a personality test developed by David Keirsey (1921–2013) that measures psychological type through the lens of four temperaments that Keirsey termed Artisan, Guardian, Idealist, and Rationalist. The KTS II consists of 70 forced choice questions. Twenty questions are employed to measure each of the dichotomous pairs of Sensing/iNtuition, Thinking/Feeling, and Judging/Perceiving, and the remaining ten questions measure Introversion and Extraversion.

Introduction

Keirsey traced the roots of his temperament theory to the classical theory of humorism as developed by the Greek philosopher Hippocrates and which was later modified by the Greek physician Claudius Galenus (Galen). In time the idea of the four bodily humors, or fluids, was mirrored in the development of a theory of four temperaments: Sanguine, Melancholic, Choleric, and Phlegmatic.

Although informed by the theories of classical antiquity, Keirsey saw a tradition of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramson, N. R. (2010). Internal reliability of the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II: Cross-national application to American, Canadian, and Korean Samples. Journal of Psychological Type, 70(2), 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berens, L. (2001). Quick guide to the 16 personality types in organizations. Huntingdon Beach: Telos Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1995). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Palo Alto: Davies-Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, N., & Bayne, R. (2007). Internal reliability and item analysis of the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II. Journal of Psychological Type, 67(8), 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J. (2005). Faith and psychology: Personality, religion and the individual. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Craig, C. L. (2007). Two different operationalisations of psychological type: Comparing the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Keirsey Temperament Sorter. In L. S. Bovar (Ed.), New psychological tests and testing research. New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirsey, D. (1998). Please understand me II: Temperament character intelligence. Del Mar: Prometheus Nemesis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirsey, D., & Bates, M. (1978). Please understand me: Character and temperament types. Del Mar: Prometheus Nemesis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. R., & Jugovic, H. J. (2001). Concurrent validity of the online version of the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II. Journal of Career Assessment, 9(1), 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majors, M. (2012). The majors personality type inventory: Professional users manual. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. F. J. (2011). Jungian typology and religion: A perspective from North America. Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 166–191.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mandy Robbins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Robbins, M., Ross, C. (2017). Keirsey Temperament Sorter. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_44-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_44-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics