Skip to main content

Loss Aversion

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 67 Accesses

Synonyms

Negativity bias; Positive-negative asymmetry

Definition

According to the loss aversion principle, the subjective value that people assign to losses exceeds the subjective value that they assign to equivalent gains. Loss aversion is regarded as one of the strongest and most robust empirical findings in the behavioral sciences. The effect is sufficiently large that, in general, a gain must be twice as large as a loss before individuals perceive the benefits of the potential gain as equal to the cost of a potential loss. First introduced by Kahneman and Tversky (1979, Tversky and Kahneman 1992), loss aversion is an integral part of prospect theory. By incorporating loss aversion and other patterns of behavior, prospect theory provides a descriptive account of judgments and choices under conditions of risk and uncertainty. Within this framework, loss aversion is represented by the lambda (λ) parameter, which controls the steepness of the value function for losses.

Introduction

The...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005). When do losses loom larger than gains? Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 134–138. doi:10.1509/jmkr.42.2.134.62283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F. (2005). Three cheers – Psychological, theoretical, empirical for loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 129–133. doi:10.1509/jmkr.42.2.129.62286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2008). Prospect theory and the brain. In P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. A. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics (pp. 1–30). London: Elsevier Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, D. (2006). A psychological law of inertia and the illusion of loss aversion. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 23–32. doi:10.1037/e683162011-083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, B. G. S., Johnson, E. J., & Fader, P. S. (1993). Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science, 12(4), 378–394. doi:10.1287/mksc.12.4.378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15(8), 534–539. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263. doi:10.2307/1914185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walasek, L., & Stewart, N. (2015). How to make loss aversion disappear and reverse: Tests of the decision by sampling origin of loss aversion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 7–11. doi:10.1037/xge0000039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukasz Walasek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Walasek, L., Mullett, T.L. (2017). Loss Aversion. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2289-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2289-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics