Skip to main content

Object Relations Theory

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 140 Accesses

Definition

Object relations theory refers to any of the psychoanalytic theories that understand emotional disturbance as a product of the child’s early developmental relationships and how those relationships are internalized. The source of pathology is held to lie in the destructive qualities of those early object relationships. The therapeutic process is conducted by illuminating the early internalized images and seeing how they play out in the therapeutic relationship and the process in general. In addition, emphasis is placed on providing the type of relationship the patient never had as well as making conscious the object relational patterns. Thus, the relationship formed between the patient and therapist is given at least as much weight as the interpretation of the patient’s experience in the therapeutic action of psychoanalytic therapy.

Introduction

Object relations theories were born from ego psychology. As psychoanalysis began to see the primary importance of the ego in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Bacal, H. (1985). Optimal responsiveness and the therapeutic process. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Progress in self psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 202–226). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balint, M. (1968), The Basic Fault: Therapuetic Aspects of Regression. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balint, M. (1985), Primary Love and Psychoanalytic Technique. London: Karnac. (original work published 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beebe, B., & Lachmann, F. (2002). Infant research and adult treatment. Hilldale: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. (1957). Differentiation of psychotic and non-psychotic personalities. In E. Spillius (Ed.), Melanie Klein today (Mainly theory, Vol. 1, pp. 61–80). London: Routledge. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. (1959). Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. (1962). Learning from experience. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object. London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, R. (1941). A revised psychopathology of the psychoses and psychoneuroses. In Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, R. (1944). Endopsychic structure considered in terms of object relationships. In Psychoanalytic studies of the personality (pp. 82–136). London: Tavistock. 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn, R. (1946). Object-relationships and dynamic structure. In Psyhoanalytic studies of the personality (pp. 137–151). London: Tavistock. 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, A. (1927). Four lectures on child analysis. In The writings of Anna Freud (Vol. 1). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. In Standard edition of the psychological writings of Sigmund Freud (Strachey transl., Vol. 18, pp. 7–64). London: Hogarth Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, E. (1945). Examination of the Kleinian system of child psychology. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. (1990), Progress in Self Psychology. Vol. 6. The Realities of Transference. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (1975). The analyst, symolization and absence in the analytic setting. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 56, 1–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (1977). The borderline concept. A conceptual framework for the understanding of borderline patients: Suggested hypotheses. In P. Hartcollis (Ed.), Borderline personality disorders (pp. 15–46). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (1997). On private madness. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, S. (1990). The work and play of Winnicott. Northvale: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guntrip, H. (1969). Schizid phenomena, object relations and the self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1972). A critique of the Kleinian school, In P. Giovachinni (Ed.), Tactics and techniques in psychoanalytic therapy (Vol. 1, pp. 62–93). New York: Science House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Aranson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O. (1984). Severe personality disorders. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernberg, O., Selzer, M., Koenigsberg, H., Carr, C., & Applebaum, A. (1988). Psychoanalytic psychotherapy of borderline patients. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. (1963). The concept of the cumulative trauma. In The privacy of the self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. (1974). The privacy of the self. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P., & Steiner, R. (Eds.). (1991). The Freud-Klein controversies 1941–45. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1937). Love, guilt, and reparation 1921–1945. New York: Free Press. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. In Envy and gratitude 1946–1963 (pp. 1–24). New York: Dell. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1952). The origins of transference. In Envy and gratitude 1946–1963 (pp. 48–56). New York: Dell. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1957). Envy and gratitude. In Envy and gratitude 1946–1963 (pp. 176–235). New York: Dell. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1960). Narrative of a child analysis (Vol. 1975). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self, Monograph series of the psychoanalytic study of the child (Vol. 4). New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1984). How does analysis cure? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Little, M. (1981). Transference neurosis and transference psychosis. New York: Aranson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, A. (1990), Other Times, Other Realities. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, T. (1993). Matrix of the mind. New York: Aranson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, E. (1991). The independent mind in British psychoanalysis. Northvale: Aranson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, H. (1987). Impasse and interpretation. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, H. (1981). The work of Hannah Segal. New York: Aranson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R., Brandchaft, B., & Atwood, R. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach. Hillsdale: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R., & Atwood, R. (1992). Contexts of being. Hillsdale: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolpin, M. (1987), The Analyst’s Stance: Transference Implications of Technical Orientayion. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 15, 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1945). Primitive emotional development. In Through pediatrics to psychoanalysis (pp. 145–156). New York: International Universities Press. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D.W. (1953), Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena: A Study of the First Not-Me Possession. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34: 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1954a) Withdrawal and Regression. In Through pediatrics to psychoanalysis (pp. 255–261). New York: International Universities Press. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1954b). Metapsychological and clinical aspects of regression. In Through pediatrics to psychoanalysis (pp. 278–294). New York: International Universities Press. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. In Maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 37–55). New York: Basic Books. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1962). Ego integration in child development. In Maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 56–63). New York: Basic Books. 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1963a). From dependence toward independence in the development of the individual. In Maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 83–92). New York: Basic Books. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1963b). Dependence in infant care, in child care, and in the psychoanalytic setting. In Maturational processes and the faciitating environment (pp. 83–92). New York: Basic Books. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Summers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Summers, F. (2017). Object Relations Theory. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1404-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1404-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics