Skip to main content

The Dark Tetrad of Personality

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Synonyms

Everyday disorders; Interpersonally malevolent; Non-criminal; Socially aversive; Subclinical; Toxic personalities

Definition

The Dark Tetrad consists of four socially offensive personality traits – narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and sadism – that fall in the normal or “everyday” range. Although theoretically distinct, they are moderately intercorrelated. Individuals with such traits manage to survive, and even flourish, in everyday society.

Introduction

Personalities can be socially aversive in a variety of distinct ways (Kowalski 2001). A subset of these are referred to as dark personalities – those characterized by interpersonally offensive traits falling in the normal or “everyday” range. Instead of requiring incarceration or clinical supervision, such individuals manage to survive, and even flourish, in everyday society (Hogan 2007; Zeigler-Hill and Marcus 2016).

Most prominent in both the theoretical and empirical literatures are three such personalities: This

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Book, A., Visser, B. A., Blais, J., Hosker-Field, A., Methot-Jones, T., Gauthier, N. Y., Volk, A., Holden, R. R., & D’Agata, M. T. (2016). Unpacking more “evil”: What is at the core of the Dark Tetrad? Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 269–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckels, E. E., Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Behavioral confirmation of everyday sadism. Psychological Science, 24, 2201–2209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2011). The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chabrol, H., Leeuwen, N. V., Rodgers, R., & Séjourné, N. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 734–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueredo, A. J., & Wolf, P. S. (2009). Assortative pairing and life history strategy. Human Nature, 20, 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B., & Maio, G. R. (2012). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 854–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harms, P. D., Spain, S. M., & Hanna, S. T. (2012). Leader development and the dark side of personality. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 495–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. (2007). Personality and the fate of organizations. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22, 420–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Schmitt, D. M., & Webster, G. D. (2008). The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Slomski, S., & Partyka, J. (2012). The dark triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 449–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Figueredo, A. J. (2013). The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark triad. European Journal of Personality, 27, 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social and Personality Psychology Science, 1, 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). Differentiating the dark triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology (pp. 249–268). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (in press). Duplicity among the dark triad: Three faces of deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Weiser, D. (2014). Differential infidelity among the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M. (2001). Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships. Washington, DC: APA press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. F. (2005). Continuity of axes I and II: Toward a unified model of personality, personality disorders, and clinical disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 233–261.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton, J. M., Binning, J. F., & Adorno, A. J. (2006). Subclinical psychopaths. In J. C. Thomas & D. Segal (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of personality and psychopathology (Vol. 1, pp. 388–411). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2014). The dark triad, the big five, and the HEXACO model. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Dutton, D. G. (2016). Everyday sadism. In V. Zeigler-Hill & D. K. Marcus (Eds.), Dark side of personality (pp. 109–120). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Jones, D. N. (2015). Measures of dark personalities. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. A., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A. (2008). A behavioral genetic investigation of the dark triad and the Big 5. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 445–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: Their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 293–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., & Lebreton, J. M. (2011). Reconsidering the dispositional bias of counterproductive work behavior: The role of aberrant personality. Personnel Psychology, 64, 593–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler-Hill, V., & Marcus, D. K. (2016). The dark side of personality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Delroy L. Paulhus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Paulhus, D.L. (2016). The Dark Tetrad of Personality. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1059-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1059-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics