Skip to main content

Would You Kill the Fat Man?

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 112 Accesses

Synonyms

Book; David Edmonds; Ethics; Moral reasoning; Morality; Trolley Problem

Definition

The question “Would you kill the fat man?” originates from the Trolley Problem – a thought experiment that explores morality. Specifically, the Trolley Problem creates morally complex scenarios that call for judgments as a means to explore the underlying rules that govern our moral instincts. David Edmonds wrote a book that explores this research called Would You Kill the Fat Man?: The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us About Right and Wrong (Edmonds 2013).

Introduction

Imagine you are standing on the side of a railroad track. Up ahead you see five men bound to the track with a train heading toward them. If you do nothing, the train will kill them. However, you can pull a lever which will cause the train to be redirected avoiding the five men. Unfortunately, on the redirected path, there is one man who is also tied to the track, and redirecting the train would kill him. What would you...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Edmonds, D. (2013). Would you kill the fat man? The trolley problem and what your answer tells us about right and wrong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds, D., Duncan, S., & Armstrong, G. (2014). Would you kill the fat man? Maryland: Recorded Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. (2013). Moral tribes. Emotion, reason and the gap between us and them. London: Atlantic Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (2012). A treatise of human nature. Massachusetts: Courier Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhail, J. (2011). Elements of moral cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (2003). Utilitarianism and on liberty: Including ‘Essay on Bentham’ and selections from the writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokol, D. (2006, May). What if. BBC News. Retrieved May, 2016, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/4954856.stm

  • Suter, R. S., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Time and moral judgment. Cognition, 119(3), 454–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. J., & Parent, W. (1986). Rights, restitution, and risk: Essays, in moral theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Wysocki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Wysocki, A. (2016). Would You Kill the Fat Man?. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_483-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_483-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics