Skip to main content

Trolley Problem, The

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 109 Accesses

Synonyms

Runaway tram

Definition

The trolley problem is a moral thought experiment involving a trolley on course to kill some number of people. The trolley can be redirected or stopped with varying consequences and with a known benefit depending on the variation of the problem itself.

Introduction

The trolley problem is a moral dilemma used first by philosophers starting in 1967 and then adopted by psychologists to examine moral thinking in humans (Cathcart 2013). The original problem was made by Philippa Foot in a philosophical paper about abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. The problem was presented as multiple variations of a scenario in which someone had to make a choice of killing one to save five. The template scenario involved flipping a switch to change the tram to a different track. These scenarios were intended to enact the doctrine of the double effect, where good consequences with bad side effects are approvable as long as the bad side effects were not intended...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bleske-Rechek, A., Nelson, L. A., Baker, J. P., Remiker, M. W., & Brandt, S. J. (2010). Evolution and the trolley problem: People save five over one unless the one is young, genetically related, or a romantic partner. Journal of Social Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 4(3), 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cathcart, T. (2013). The trolley problem, or would you throw the fat guy off the bridge?: A philosophical conundrum. New York: Workman Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, N., Colman, A. M., & Pulford, B. D. (2014). Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley problems. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(1), 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete, C. D., McDonald, M. M., Mott, M. L., & Asher, B. (2012). Virtual morality: Emotion and action in a simulated three-dimensional “trolley problem”. Emotion, 12(2), 364–370. doi:10.1037/a0025561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2005). Ethics and intuitions. The Journal of Ethics, 9, 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Randazzo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Randazzo, G. (2016). Trolley Problem, The. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_472-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_472-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics