Skip to main content

Causal Reasoning in Rats (Blaisdell et al. 2006)

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

Bayes net theory; Causal inferences; Causal-model theory

Definition

The process of identifying and understanding the relationships among causes and their effects.

Introduction

As descendants of Darwin, contemporary psychologists who study animal learning try to identify continuity in species’ cognitive and problem-solving abilities. As descendants of Galileo, these same psychologists prefer to study animal learning in laboratory environments that have been standardized to reduce unwanted behaviors and automated to facilitate the presentation of stimuli and the recording of responses. It was within these traditions that Blaisdell et al. (2006) conducted three experiments to demonstrate that rats were capable of causal reasoning, a form of thinking thought possible only by humans.

The type of reasoning studied by Blaisdell et al. is often illustrated by two analogies. The first analogy illustrates reasoning about a common cause: A change in atmospheric pressure causes...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J., & Waldmann, M. R. (2006). Causal reasoning in rats. Science, 311, 1020–1022. Supporting online material: www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/311/5763/1020/DC1

  • Burgess, K. V., Dwyer, D. M., & Honey, R. C. (2012). Re-assessing causal accounts of learnt behavior in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 38, 148–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, D. M., Starns, J., & Honey, R. C. (2009). “Causal reasoning” in rats: A reappraisal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 578–586.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Killeen, P. R. (2014). Pavlov + Skinner = Premack. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 27, 544–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutlu, M. G., & Schmajuk, N. A. (2012). Classical conditioning mechanisms can differentiate between seeing and doing in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 38, 84–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leising, K. J., Wong, J., Waldmann, M. S., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2008). The special status of actions in causal reasoning in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 514–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado, A. (2005). Editorial. Behavior & Philosophy, 33, vii–ix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D. C., & Povinelli, D. J. (2007). Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: A comparative, critical approach. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 97–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake, W. (2004). Trends in the study of Pavlovian conditioning. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 17, 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Francisco J. Silva or Kathleen M. Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Silva, F.J., Silva, K.M. (2016). Causal Reasoning in Rats (Blaisdell et al. 2006). In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3116-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3116-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics