Skip to main content

Technical Intelligence Hypothesis, The

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

The extractive foraging hypothesis

Definition

The need to efficiently organize behaviors requiring a high number of sequential operations leads to selection for increased intelligence.

Introduction

The technical intelligence hypothesis is one of the most popular explanations for the evolution of human intelligence. It posits that the need to efficiently organize behaviors requiring a high number of operations led to the evolution of increased intelligence (Whiten and Byrne 1997). The hypothesis was first proposed by Byrne and Whiten as an alternative to the social intelligence hypothesis (cf. Byrne and Whiten 1989; Whiten and Byrne 1997), as within primates, great apes appeared to show certain cognitive skills that could not be explained by differences in social organization.

How to Test for the Technical Intelligence Hypothesis?

Testing the validity of the technical intelligence hypothesis is challenging. It first requires to define what we mean by intelligence. Second, it...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bird, C. D., & Emery, N. J. (2009). Insightful problem solving and creative tool modification by captive non tool using rooks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 10 370–10 375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, R., & Whiten, A. (1989). Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford: Oxford Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cnotka, J., Güntürkün, O., Rehkämper, G., Gray, R. D., & Hunt, G. R. (2008). Extraordinary large brains in tool-using New Caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides). Neuroscience Letters, 433, 241–245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ducatez, S., Clavel, J., & Lefebvre, L. (2014). Ecological generalism and behavioural innovation in birds: Technical intelligence or the simple incorporation of new foods? Journal of Animal Ecology, 84, 79–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, L., & Gajdon, G. K. (2006). Technical intelligence in animals: The kea model. Animal Cognition, 9, 295–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwaniuk, A. N., Wylie, D. R., & Lefebvre, L. (2009). The comparative approach and brain-behaviour relationships: A tool for understanding tool use. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 150–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kacelnik, A. (2009). Tools for thought or thoughts for tools? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 10071–10072.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kummer, H., & Goodall, J. (1985). Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 308, 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, L., Whittle, P., Lascaris, E., & Finkelstein, A. (1997). Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Animal Behaviour, 53, 549–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, L., Nicolakakis, N., & Boire, D. (2002). Tools and brains in birds. Behaviour, 139, 939–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, L., Ducatez, S., & Audet, J. N. (2016). Feeding innovations in a nested phylogeny of Neotropical passerines. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371, 20150186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlhorn, J., Hunt, G. R., Gray, R. D., Rehkämper, G., & Güntürkün, O. (2010). Tool-making New-Caledonian crows have large associative brain areas. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 75, 63–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, N. J., Call, J., & Dunbar, R. I. (2005). Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) encode relevant problem features in a tool-using task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 23–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Navarrete, A. F., Reader, S. M., Street, S. E., Whalen, A., & Laland, K. N. (2016). The coevolution of innovation and technical intelligence in primates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371, 20150186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, K. (1956). The earliest tool-makers. Antiquity, 30, 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overington, S. E., Boogert, N. J., Morand-Ferron, J., & Lefebvre, L. (2009). Technical innovations drive the relationship between innovativeness and residual brain size in birds. Animal Behaviour, 78, 1001–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. T., & Gibson, K. R. (1977). Object manipulation, tool use and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in Cebus monkeys and great apes. Journal of Human Evolution, 6, 623–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reader, S. M., & Laland, K. N. (2002). Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 4436–4441.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shumaker, R. W., Walkup, K. R., & Beck, B. B. (2011). Animal tool behavior: The use and manufacture of tools by animals. Baltimore: JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sol, D. (2015). The evolution of innovativeness: Exaptation or specialized adaptation? In A. Kaufman & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Animal creativity and innovation: Research and theory (pp. 163–182). San Diego: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sol, D., Sayol, F., Ducatez, S., & Lefebvre, L. (2016). The life-history basis of behavioural innovations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371, 20150187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. H., & Gray, R. D. (2014). Is there a link between the crafting of tools and the evolution of cognition? WIREs Cognitive Science, 5, 693–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. H., Hunt, G. R., Holzhaider, J. C., & Gray, R. D. (2007). Spontaneous metatool use by New Caledonian crows. Current Biology, 17, 1504–1507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teschke, I., Wascher, C. A. F., Scriba, M. F., von Bayern, A. M. P., Huml, V., Siemers, B., & Tebbich, S. (2013). Did tool-use evolve with enhanced physical cognitive abilities? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368, 20120418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A., & Byrne, R. W. (1997). Machiavellian intelligence II: Extensions and evaluations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Louis Lefebvre for suggestions that greatly improved the manuscript, and the Spanish project CGL2013-47448-P for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Simon Ducatez , Ferran Sayol or Daniel Sol .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ducatez, S., Sayol, F., Sol, D. (2016). Technical Intelligence Hypothesis, The. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3103-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3103-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics