Skip to main content

Ingredients of Reciprocal Altruism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 233 Accesses

Synonyms

Cooperation; Reciprocity

Definition

A mutually beneficial exchange of goods or services.

Introduction

The term “reciprocal altruism” was introduced by Robert Trivers in his seminal 1971 paper to characterize exchanges of goods or services between two or more unrelated members of the same or different species that increase the fitness of each partner to the exchange. Trivers’ (1971) paper had a great deal of impact on the field of evolutionary biology because it offered an explanation for the evolution of altruism that could not be accounted for by kin selection. However, the term reciprocal altruism is ambiguous. Although the proffering and reciprocation of goods and services by each member of a reciprocal exchange may be considered altruistic because actors suffer costs to bestow benefits on recipients, the ultimate effect of the exchange is biologically selfish when it produces a net gain in fitness for both participants. Adaptations that enable such exchanges have evolved...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, P. (2004). Trustworthiness and competitive altruism can also solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1992). Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M., & Brosnan, S. F. (2006). Simple and complex reciprocity in animals. In P. M. Kappeler & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Cooperation in primates and humans (pp. 85–105). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M., & Luttrell, L. M. (1988). Mechanisms of social reciprocity in three primate species: Symmetrical relationship characteristics or cognition? Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin, L. A. (1997). Cooperation among animals: An evolutionary perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, F. J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 539–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein, P. (2003). Why is reciprocity so rare in social animals? A Protestant appeal. In P. Hammerstein (Ed.), Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation (pp. 83–93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B. L., & Hart, L. A. (1992). Reciprocal allogrooming in impala Aepyceros melampus. Animal Behavior, 44, 1073–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. D., Mcauliffe, K., & Blake, P. (2009). Evolving the ingredients for reciprocity and spite. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3255–3266.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K. (1983). Kin selection and culture. American Ethnologist, 10, 346–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D. L. (2011). The origins of morality: An evolutionary account. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314, 1560–1563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393, 573–577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G., & Sherratt, T. N. (1988). Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature, 394, 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (1988). Empirical tests of reciprocity theory: Problems in assessments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker’s paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Devore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), The evolution of human behavior: Primate models (pp. 183–237). Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (2006). Reciprocal altruism: 30 years later. In P. M. Kappeler & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Cooperation in primates and humans (pp. 67–84). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. S. (1990). Food sharing in vampire bats. Scientific American, 262, 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Krebs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Krebs, D. (2016). Ingredients of Reciprocal Altruism. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3048-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3048-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics