Definition
Male resource provision plays an important role in parental care and offspring survival; as a consequence it can act as a signal that is important in female mate choice. Male resource provision involves providing material extrinsic investments in the form of food, shelter, and protection and can be signaled through wealth and status.
Introduction
Because human babies require a longer period of parental care compared to other mammals, parental investment by both sexes can have implications for offspring survival (Hill and Hurtado 1996; Nettle 2008). Since males invest in parental care through extrinsic material investments, through resources in the form of food, shelter, and protection, it pays for women to select mates that have the ability to make these provisions (Symons 1979). Males show off (signal) resources through wealth and status because females have marked...
References
Anderson, R. C., & Klofstad, C. A. (2012). For love or money? The influence of personal resources and environmental resource pressures on human mate preferences. Ethology, 118(9), 841–849.
Bateman, A. J. (1948). lntra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2(3), 349–368.
Bereczkei, T., & Csanaky, A. (1996). Mate choice, marital success, and reproduction in a modern society. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17(1), 17–35.
Bliege Bird, R., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signalling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46, 221–248.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preference. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
Farrelly, D. (2013). Altruism as an indicator of good parenting quality in long-term relationships: Further investigations using the mate preferences towards altruistic traits scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(4), 395–398.
Greenlees, I. A., & McGrew, W. C. (1994). Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: Analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), 59–72.
Hawkes, K., & Bliege Bird, R. (2002). Showing off, handicap signalling, and the evolution of men’s work. Evolutionary Anthropology, 11, 58–67.
Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. Hawthorne/New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Iredale, W., Van Vugt, M., & Dunbar, R. (2008). Showing off in humans: Male generosity as mate signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 386–392.
Kruger, D. J., Fisher, M., & Jobling, I. (2003). Proper and dark heroes as dads and cads: Alternative mating strategies in British romantic literature. Human Nature, 14, 305–317.
Li, N. P., Valentine, K. A., & Patel, L. (2011). Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 291–294.
Li, Y. M., Li, J., Chan, D. K. S., & Zhang, B. (2016). When love meets money: Priming the possession of money influences mating strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.
Lycett, J. E., & Dunbar, R. I. (2000). Mobile phones as lekking devices among human males. Human Nature, 11(1), 93–104.
McGraw, K. J. (2002). Environmental predictors of geographic variation in human mate preferences. Ethology, 108, 303–317.
Miller, G. F. (2001). The mating mind. London: Vintage.
Moore, F. R., Cassidy, C., Smith, M. J. L., & Perrett, D. I. (2006). The effects of female control of resources on sex-differentiated mate preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(3), 193–205.
Nettle, D. (2008). Why do some dads get more involved than others? Evidence from a large British cohort. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 29, 416–423.
Pawlowski, B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1999). Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions. Proceedings Royal Society London, B, 266, 281–285.
Portmann, A. (1990). A zoologist looks at Humankind. New York: Columbia University Press.
Roberts, G. (1998). Competitive altruism: from reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265(1394), 427–431.
Souza, A. L., Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Mate preferences in Brazil: Evolved desires and cultural evolution over three decades. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 45–49.
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tognetti, A., Berticat, C., Raymond, M., & Faurie, C. (2012). Sexual selection of human cooperative behaviour: An experimental study in rural Senegal. PLoS One, 7(9), e44403.
Townsend, J. M. & Levy, G. D. (1990). Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 19, 149–164.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.
Van Vugt, M., & Iredale, W. (2012). Men behaving nicely: Public goods as peacock tails. British Journal of Psychology, 104(1), 3–13.
Veblen, T. (1973). The theory of the leisure class. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [Originally published in 1899].
Waynforth, D., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: Evidence from “Lonely Hearts” advertisements. Behaviour, 132, 755–779.
Yong, J. C., & Li, N. P. (2012). Cash in hand, want better looking mate: Significant resource cues raise men’s mating standards. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 55–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Iredale, W. (2016). Resources. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_28-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_28-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences