Skip to main content

Resources

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 45 Accesses

Synonyms

Food; Male provision; Material extrinsic investments; Shelter and protection; Status and wealth

Definition

Male resource provision plays an important role in parental care and offspring survival; as a consequence it can act as a signal that is important in female mate choice. Male resource provision involves providing material extrinsic investments in the form of food, shelter, and protection and can be signaled through wealth and status.

Introduction

Because human babies require a longer period of parental care compared to other mammals, parental investment by both sexes can have implications for offspring survival (Hill and Hurtado 1996; Nettle 2008). Since males invest in parental care through extrinsic material investments, through resources in the form of food, shelter, and protection, it pays for women to select mates that have the ability to make these provisions (Symons 1979). Males show off (signal) resources through wealth and status because females have marked...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, R. C., & Klofstad, C. A. (2012). For love or money? The influence of personal resources and environmental resource pressures on human mate preferences. Ethology, 118(9), 841–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. (1948). lntra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2(3), 349–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bereczkei, T., & Csanaky, A. (1996). Mate choice, marital success, and reproduction in a modern society. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17(1), 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliege Bird, R., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signalling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46, 221–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preference. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrelly, D. (2013). Altruism as an indicator of good parenting quality in long-term relationships: Further investigations using the mate preferences towards altruistic traits scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(4), 395–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenlees, I. A., & McGrew, W. C. (1994). Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: Analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., & Bliege Bird, R. (2002). Showing off, handicap signalling, and the evolution of men’s work. Evolutionary Anthropology, 11, 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. Hawthorne/New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iredale, W., Van Vugt, M., & Dunbar, R. (2008). Showing off in humans: Male generosity as mate signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 386–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, D. J., Fisher, M., & Jobling, I. (2003). Proper and dark heroes as dads and cads: Alternative mating strategies in British romantic literature. Human Nature, 14, 305–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P., Valentine, K. A., & Patel, L. (2011). Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 291–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. M., Li, J., Chan, D. K. S., & Zhang, B. (2016). When love meets money: Priming the possession of money influences mating strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycett, J. E., & Dunbar, R. I. (2000). Mobile phones as lekking devices among human males. Human Nature, 11(1), 93–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, K. J. (2002). Environmental predictors of geographic variation in human mate preferences. Ethology, 108, 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. F. (2001). The mating mind. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, F. R., Cassidy, C., Smith, M. J. L., & Perrett, D. I. (2006). The effects of female control of resources on sex-differentiated mate preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(3), 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2008). Why do some dads get more involved than others? Evidence from a large British cohort. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 29, 416–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1999). Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions. Proceedings Royal Society London, B, 266, 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portmann, A. (1990). A zoologist looks at Humankind. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. (1998). Competitive altruism: from reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265(1394), 427–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza, A. L., Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Mate preferences in Brazil: Evolved desires and cultural evolution over three decades. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 45–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tognetti, A., Berticat, C., Raymond, M., & Faurie, C. (2012). Sexual selection of human cooperative behaviour: An experimental study in rural Senegal. PLoS One, 7(9), e44403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J. M. & Levy, G. D. (1990). Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 19, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M., & Iredale, W. (2012). Men behaving nicely: Public goods as peacock tails. British Journal of Psychology, 104(1), 3–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1973). The theory of the leisure class. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [Originally published in 1899].

    Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth, D., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: Evidence from “Lonely Hearts” advertisements. Behaviour, 132, 755–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong, J. C., & Li, N. P. (2012). Cash in hand, want better looking mate: Significant resource cues raise men’s mating standards. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(1), 55–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy Iredale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Iredale, W. (2016). Resources. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_28-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_28-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics