Skip to main content

Trade-Off between Exploration and Exploitation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

You could be reading this or you could be writing that long overdue article. The tradeoff is a natural one and it is the foundation of one of the oldest problems in animal evolution: How should an organism choose between exploiting a resource or exploring to find new resources? This problem is known as the exploration versus exploitation trade-off (EvE) and it cuts across domains – in decision research, visual attention, animal foraging, memory search, and computer science, the same basic problem repeatedly surfaces.

The diversity of situations in which this trade-off arises has, in turn, led to a diversity of solutions. In reinforcement learning, rules that achieve appropriate learning rates have elements of exploration intermixed with longer periods of exploitation (Sutton and Barto 1998). Rules such as the epsilon-greedy algorithminvolve a greedy exploitative component that always chooses options with the highest known payoffs intermixed with some small (epsilon) amount of random...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9(2), 129–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourg, J. L., et al. (1986). Random behaviour, amplification processes and number of participants: How they contribute to the foraging properties of ants. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 22, 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galhardo, R. S., Hastings, P. J., & Rosenberg, S. M. (2007). Mutation as a stress response and the regulation of evolvability. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 42(5), 399–435.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, T. T. (2006). Animal foraging and the evolution of goal-directed cognition. Cognitive Science, 30(1), 3–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, T. T., & Butterfill, S. (2015). From foraging to autonoetic consciousness: The primal self as a consequence of embodied prospective foraging. Current Zoology, 61, 368–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, T. T., Jones, M. N., & Todd, P. M. (2012). Optimal foraging in semantic memory. Psychological Review, 119(2), 431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, T. T., Kalff, C., & Wiener, J. M. (2013). Adaptive Lévy processes and area-restricted search in human foraging. PloS One, 8(4), e60488.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010). The central executive as a search process: Priming exploration and exploitation across domains. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, T. T., Todd, P., Lazer, D., Redish, A., Couzin, I., and the Cognitive Search Research Group* (*Bateson, M., Cools, R., Dukas, R., Giraldeau, L., Macy, M.W., Page, S.E., Shiffrin, R.M., Stephens, D.W., Uzzi, B., Wolfe, J.W.). (2015). Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simmulated annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4), 643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (Vol. 1, No. 1). Cambridge: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas T. Hills .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hills, T.T. (2017). Trade-Off between Exploration and Exploitation. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2660-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2660-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics