You could be reading this or you could be writing that long overdue article. The tradeoff is a natural one and it is the foundation of one of the oldest problems in animal evolution: How should an organism choose between exploiting a resource or exploring to find new resources? This problem is known as the exploration versus exploitation trade-off (EvE) and it cuts across domains – in decision research, visual attention, animal foraging, memory search, and computer science, the same basic problem repeatedly surfaces.
The diversity of situations in which this trade-off arises has, in turn, led to a diversity of solutions. In reinforcement learning, rules that achieve appropriate learning rates have elements of exploration intermixed with longer periods of exploitation (Sutton and Barto 1998). Rules such as the epsilon-greedy algorithminvolve a greedy exploitative component that always chooses options with the highest known payoffs intermixed with some small (epsilon) amount of random...
References
Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9(2), 129–136.
Deneubourg, J. L., et al. (1986). Random behaviour, amplification processes and number of participants: How they contribute to the foraging properties of ants. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 22, 176–186.
Galhardo, R. S., Hastings, P. J., & Rosenberg, S. M. (2007). Mutation as a stress response and the regulation of evolvability. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 42(5), 399–435.
Hills, T. T. (2006). Animal foraging and the evolution of goal-directed cognition. Cognitive Science, 30(1), 3–41.
Hills, T. T., & Butterfill, S. (2015). From foraging to autonoetic consciousness: The primal self as a consequence of embodied prospective foraging. Current Zoology, 61, 368–381.
Hills, T. T., Jones, M. N., & Todd, P. M. (2012). Optimal foraging in semantic memory. Psychological Review, 119(2), 431.
Hills, T. T., Kalff, C., & Wiener, J. M. (2013). Adaptive Lévy processes and area-restricted search in human foraging. PloS One, 8(4), e60488.
Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010). The central executive as a search process: Priming exploration and exploitation across domains. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 590.
Hills, T. T., Todd, P., Lazer, D., Redish, A., Couzin, I., and the Cognitive Search Research Group* (*Bateson, M., Cools, R., Dukas, R., Giraldeau, L., Macy, M.W., Page, S.E., Shiffrin, R.M., Stephens, D.W., Uzzi, B., Wolfe, J.W.). (2015). Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 46–54.
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simmulated annealing. Science, 220(4598), 671–680.
Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4), 643.
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (Vol. 1, No. 1). Cambridge: MIT press.
Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hills, T.T. (2017). Trade-Off between Exploration and Exploitation. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2660-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2660-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences