Synonyms
Definition
The decrease of perceived value of a particular item as time passes.
Introduction
All types of organisms are constantly making choices throughout their lives. Some of these choices are simple, with one alternative clearly better than the other. However, other choices that must be made are less clear-cut. When human beings and other organisms make decisions, how do they actually analyze and decide between two alternatives? When faced with the choice between two items that differ only on one factor, individuals should pick a larger value over a smaller value, a reward available sooner over a reward available later, and a more certain reward over a less certain reward (Green and Myerson 2004). These are the basics that determine how organisms make the best possible choices. Nevertheless, this only explains one simple type of choice; in reality, most choices are much more complex and differ on many factors. When multiple...
References
Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2005). Carpe diem: Adaptation and devaluing the future. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 80(1), 55–60. doi:10.1086/431025.
Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H., & Schlomer, G. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20, 204–268. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (1993). Alternative frameworks for the analysis of self control. Behavior and Philosophy, 21(2), 37–47.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychology Bull, 130(5), 769–792. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769.
Griskevicius, V., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & Tybur, J. M. (2011a). Environmental contingency in life history strategies: The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on reproductive timing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 241–254. doi:10.1037/a0021082.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2011b). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1015–1026. doi:10.1037/a0022403.
Griskevicius, V., Ackerman, J. M., Cantu, S. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., Simpson, J. A., Thompson, M. E., & Tybur, J. M. (2013). When the economy falters, do people spend or save? Responses to resource scarcity depend on childhood environments. Psychological Science, 24(2), 197–205. doi:10.1177/0956797612451471.
Hantula, D., & Bryant, K. (2005). Delay discounting determines delivery fees in an e-commerce simulation: A behavioral economic perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 22, 153–161. doi:10.1002/Anai.20052.
Kirby, K. N., & Marakovic, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(1), 100–104. doi:10.3758/BF03210748.
Mahoney, C. T., & Lawyer, S. R. (2016). Delay and probability discounting among payday and title loan recipients. Behavioural Processes, 125, 13–18. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2016.01.011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Fisher, A., Armijo, A.J., Hill, W.T. (2016). Discounting of Future Returns. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1939-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1939-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences