Skip to main content

Online Survey

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 295 Accesses

Synonyms

Internet survey; Internet questionnaire; Online questionnaire; Web-based survey; Web-based questionnaire

Definition

A Web-based survey used to collect information.

Introduction

As mentioned in the Surveys and Questionnaires section, data collection can occur online. Online methods can present unique benefits when compared with traditional survey methods, but they also come with a unique set of challenges. This section will discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages to using online methods, some ways to improve the quality of data collected online, and, finally, one commonly used source of online participants, Amazon Mechanical Turk.

Benefits of Online Surveys

Many of the positive aspects of online surveys revolve around the ease of creation and use, broad reach, low associated expense, and quick turnaround when compared to traditional survey methods. Online methods can be developed easily and quickly through software specifically designed for survey creation or through...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw, D. (2005). To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., Phelps, G., Tortora, R., Swift, K., Kohrell, J., Berck, J., & Messer, B. L. (2009). Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research, 38, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior research methods, 48(1), 400–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, J., & Chilton, L. (2010). The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Analyzing the amazon mechanical turk marketplace. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 17, 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior research methods, 44(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Himes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Himes, S., Brandner, J. (2016). Online Survey. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1849-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1849-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics