Skip to main content

Cloning: Animal

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 388 Accesses

Abstract

Technological developments in the field of bioengineering have allowed for the successful cloning of organisms. Cloning is no longer only the subject of science fiction because animal cloning has already been realized, paving the way for the possibility of human cloning. Although Dolly the sheep is the most famous attempt to clone an animal, it was neither the first nor the last organism that has been cloned, and inasmuch as animal cloning may represent scientific and technological progress, and hold benefits, it raises ethical issues.

Part I of this chapter describes the terms “cloning” and “clone” and distinguishes different types of cloning. The different methods used to clone animals are also described.

Part II reviews the development of animal cloning science and gives an overview of events pivotal to the development of animal cloning and its potential applications and purposes.

Part III considers the ethical concerns surrounding animal cloning. Objections to animal cloning are reviewed and the merits of anti-cloning arguments evaluated. Some arguments that can be made against animal cloning can be easily refuted, while other arguments constitute serious objections to cloning that require public consideration and debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alicea, B., & Cibelli, J. B. (2014). Comparing SCNT-derived ESCs and iPSCs. Principles of Cloning. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-386541-0.00037-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiester, A. (2005). Ethical issues in animal cloning. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48(2), 328–343. doi:10.1353/pbm.2005.0072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadjantonakis, A. K., & Papaioannou, V. E. (2002). Can mammalian cloning combined with embryonic stem cell technologies be used to treat human diseases? Genome Biology, 3(8), REVIEWS1023. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC139399/

  • Jabr, F. (2013). Will cloning ever save endangered species? Scientific American. Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=cloning-endangered-animals

  • Kant, I. (2006). Duties towards animals. In H. Kuhse & P. Singer (Eds.), Bioethics: An anthology (pp. 564–565). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kfoury, C. (2007). Therapeutic cloning: Promises and issues. McGill Journal of Medicine, 10(2), 112–120. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2323472/

  • National Academy of Sciences. (2002). Scientific and medical aspects of human reproductive cloning. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10285.html

  • National Human Genome Research Institute. (2014). Cloning fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.genome.gov

  • Paterson, L., DeSousa, P., Ritchie, W., King, T., & Wilmut, I. (2003). Application of reproductive biotechnology in animals: Implications and potentials. Applications of reproductive cloning. Animal Reproduction Science, 79, 137–143. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14643101

  • Solter, D. (2000). Mammalian cloning: Advances and limitations. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 1, 199–207. doi:10.1038/35042066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vajta, G., & Gjerris, M. (2006). Science and technology of farm animal cloning: State of the art. Animal Reproduction Science, 92, 211–230. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, J. C., & Kobayashi, N. R. (2010). The bioethics of human pluripotent stem cells: Will induced pluripotent stem cells end the debate? The Open Stem Cell Journal, 2, 18–24. Retrieved from http://benthamopen.com/toscj/articles/V002/SI0006toscj/18TOSCJ.pdf

  • Wilmut, I., Campbell, K., & Tudge, C. (2000). The second creation: The age of biological control by the scientists who cloned Dolly. London: Headline Book Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka, S., & Blau, H. M. (2010). Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches. Nature, 465(7299), 704. doi:10.1038/nature09229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Fox, M. W. (1999). Beyond evolution: The genetically altered future of plants, animals, the earth, and humans. New York: The Lyons Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greek, R., & Swingle Greek, J. (2000). Sacred cows and golden geese: The human cost of experiments on animals. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotzko, A. (2001). The cloning sourcebook. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmut, I., Campbell, K., & Tudge, C. (2000). The second generation: Dolly and the age of biological control. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jillian Gardner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Gardner, J. (2014). Cloning: Animal. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_94-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_94-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics