Skip to main content

Clinical Ethics: Accreditation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

Clinical ethics accreditation deals with the accreditation of training programs and of individual professionals who provide ethics consultation services. The purpose of ethics consultation is to adopt an ethics facilitation approach that fosters consensus around the most ethical treatment in a situation of ambiguity, dilemma, or dispute. A reliable model for accreditation integrates formal degree education with clinical residency, each followed by examinations. This model emphasizes professional practice standards that integrate knowledge and skills, with the former preceding the latter. This model suggests that it would be odd to certify individuals based on fellowship experiences in ethics consultations prior to completing the requisite knowledge standard. The goal of clinical ethics accreditation is to establish best practices based on empirical data to ensure the highest quality in ethics consultation services around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASBH. (2011). Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation, (2nd ed.). Glenview: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASBH. (2015). Improving competencies in clinical ethics consultation. An education guide (2nd ed.). Glenview: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aulisio, M. P., et al. (2003). Ethics consultation: From theory to practice. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. E. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feister, A. (2014). The “Quality Attestation” process and the risk of the false positive. The Hastings Center Report, 44(3), 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feister, A. (2015). Neglected ends: Clinical ethics consultation and the prospects for closure. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(1), 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. (2014). Developing a certifying examination for health care ethics consultants. The American Journal of Bioethics, 14(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, D. M., et al. (2012). Guidance for healthcare ethics committees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, R. J., et al. (2006). Clinical ethics. A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodish, E., et al. (2013). Quality attestation for clinical ethics consultants. The Hastings Center Report, 43(5), 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magill, G. (2013). Quality in ethics consultations. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, 16(4), 761–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, L. F., et al. (2007). Handbook for health care ethics committees. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, L. M. (2012). Patient advocacy in clinical ethics consultation. The American Journal of Bioethics, 12(8), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarzian, A. J., et al. (2013). Health care ethics consultation: An update on core competencies and emerging standards. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(2), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarzian, A. J., et al. (2015). A code of ethics for health care ethics consultants: Journey to the present and implications for the field. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(5), 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weise, K. L., & Daly, B. J. (2014). Exploring accountability of clinical ethics consultants: Practice and training implications. The American Journal of Bioethics, 14(6), 34–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B. D., et al. (2014). Structuring a written examination to assess ASBH health care ethics consultation core knowledge competencies. The American Journal of Bioethics, 14(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • ASBH. (2011). Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation, (2nd ed.). Glenview: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magill, G. (2013). Quality in ethics consultations. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, 16(4), 761–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarzian, A. J., et al. (2013). Health care ethics consultation: An update on core competencies and emerging standards. The American Journal of Bioethics, 13(2), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. D., et al. (2014). Structuring a written examination to assess ASBH health care ethics consultation core knowledge competencies. The American Journal of Bioethics, 14(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerard Magill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Magill, G., Chair, V.F.G. (2015). Clinical Ethics: Accreditation. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_85-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_85-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics