Skip to main content

Citizenship

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 204 Accesses

Abstract

Citizenship designates membership in a political community on equal terms with any other member of the same community. The Greeks and the Romans have bequeathed us different models of citizenship, which were to an extent combined during the French Revolution. According to the standard contemporary conception, a citizen is associated either through domicile or birth with a sovereign state and is a bearer of civil, political, and social rights. This view, however, has been recently criticized as inadequate on the grounds that it is orientalist and it does not take into account immigrants, gendered differences, the multicultural structure of most societies, and the virtues and attitudes necessary to be a good citizen. Moreover, scholars have started debating the possibilities of citizenship beyond borders. It is argued that a particular version of this type of citizenship proposed by Nussbaum, if properly cultivated and disseminated, has the potential to ground procedures leading to international agreements in the field of bioethics on a more solid and representative basis marked by genuine cross-cultural understanding and mutual respect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloemrad, I., Korteweg, A., & Yurdakul, G. (2008). Citizenship and immigration: Multiculturalism, assimilation, and challenges to the nation-state. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 153–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, W. R. (1989). The French revolution and the invention of citizenship. French Politics and Society, 7, 30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (Ed.). (2005). Women and citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, P. (2006). Roman citizenship and Roman law in the late empire. In S. Swain & M. Edwards (Eds.), Approaching late antiquity: The transformation from early to late empire (pp. 133–155). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. H. (2006). Polis: An introduction to the ancient Greek City-State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. F. (2002). Citizenship after οrientalism. In E. F. Isin & B. S. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of citizenship studies (pp. 117–128). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. F., & Saward, M. (Eds.). (2013). Enacting European citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2007). Multicultural odysseys: Navigating the international politics of diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydet, D. (2014). Citizenship. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/citizenship. Accessed 11 Aug 2014.

  • Macedo, S. (1991). Liberal virtues: Citizenship, virtue, and community in liberal constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisson, A. I. (2014). Orientalism and the construction of the apolitical Buddhist subject. In E. F. Isin & P. Nyers (Eds.), Routledge handbook of global citizenship studies (pp. 325–334). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (2012). On the people’s terms: A republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J. G. A. (1995). The ideal of citizenship since classical times. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing citizenship (pp. 29–52). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, D. (2005). Human rights and their role in global bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 14, 221–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1978). The foundations of modern political thought (The renaissance, Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Bellamy, R. (2008). Citizenship: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J. H. (2013). The ethics of immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., & Norman, W. (1995). Return of the citizen: a survey of recent work on citizenship theory. In R. Beiner (Ed.), Theorizing citizenship (pp. 283–322). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filimon Peonidis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Peonidis, F. (2014). Citizenship. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_81-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_81-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics