Skip to main content

Biology: Ethics of

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

This entry describes the relations between the science of biology and the ethical reflection. The general notions involved are defined and several of the main problems and issues are analyzed from a logical as well as from a moral point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bentham, J. (1789). The principles of morals and legislation, ch. XVII, note to IV. Oxford. Reprinted (1907), Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckholtz, J. W. (2010). Dopaminergic network differences in human impulsivity. Science, 329, 532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, M. J. (2010). Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 17433–17438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, F. (2013). The bonobo and the Atheist: In search of humanism among the primates. New York: W. W Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. J. (2009). Oxytocin: The great facilitator of life. Progress in Neurobiology, 88(2), 127–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, Z. A. (1969). The rise and fall of T.D. Lysenko. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1903). Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosterín, J. (2009). La cultura humana. Madrid: Espasa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosterín, J. (2013). Neural reality and social convention: Do they overlap? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1299, 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions, emotions, and experience. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, L. (2007). Synthetic biology: Promises and challenges. Molecular Systems Biology, 3, 158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamoo, A., & Resnik, D. (2009). Responsible conduct of research (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. W. (1986). Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venter, J. C. (2013). Life at the speed of light: From the double Helix to the dawn of digital life. New York: Viking Adult.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Boniolo, G., & De Ana, G. (Eds.). (2009). Evolutionary ethics and contemporary biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maienschein, J., & Ruse, M. (Eds.). (1999). Biology and the foundation of ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús Mosterín .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mosterín, J. (2015). Biology: Ethics of. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_55-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_55-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics