Skip to main content

Autonomy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

Autonomy is a central principle in bioethics and research ethics. In this essay, a historical account of the moral and philosophical foundations for the principle of autonomy and its conceptualization in bioethical discourse is presented. An explanation on the application of autonomy in clinical practice and biomedical research by contextualizing it within a global bioethical framework is provided because the assumption of autonomy is that each person has the right and capacity to make her or his own decisions about medical procedures, treatment, and biomedical research. An examination of the challenges in the universality of the ethical concept of autonomy in bioethics is highlighted. The essay concludes with a summary of the major discussion points on autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beach, M. C., et al. (2007). What does respect mean? Exploring the moral obligation of health professionals to respect patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(5), 692–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1994a). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, C. (1999). The myth of liberal individualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackhall, L. J., Murphy, S. T., Frank, G., Michel, V., & Azen, S. (1995). Ethnicity and attitudes towards patient autonomy. Journal of American Medical Association, 274(10), 820–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggio, A., Zignol, M., Jaramullo, E., Nunn, P., Pinet, G., & Raviglione, M. (2013). Limitations on human rights: Are they justifiable to reduce the burden of TB in the era of MDR and XDR-TB. In: http://www.hhrjournal.org. Accessed 15 Feb 2015.

  • Bowman, K., Singer, P., & Richard, S. (2004). Chinese seniors’ perspectives on truth-telling. International Journal of Ethics, 3(4), 405–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunstan, G. (1994). Should philosophy and medical ethics be left to the experts? In S. Bewley & R. H. Ward (Eds.), Ethics in obstetrics and gynaecology. London: RCOG Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, W. M., Frederick, R. E., & Schwartz, M. S. (2001). Business ethics: Readings and cases in corporate morality (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klazinga, N. (1994). Compliance with practice guidelines: Clinical autonomy revisited. Health Policy, 28(1), 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushe, H., & Singer, P. (2013a). A companion to bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, W.-C. (2002). Why the professional-client ethic is inadequate in mental health care. Nursing Ethics, 9(1), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lysaught, M. T. (2004). Respect: Or how respect for persons became respect for autonomy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29(6), 665–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mappes, T.A., & DeGrazia, D. (eds.) (1996). Biomedical Ethics (4th edition), McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Health Department. (2005). Consent to medical treatment – Patient information. In http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au. Accessed 15 Feb 2015.

  • O’Neill,O. (2002a). Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantilat, S. (2008). Autonomy vs. beneficence. UCSF School of Medicine. Regents, University of California. In http://www.msinglink.ucsf.edu. Accessed 15 Feb 2015.

  • Pellegrino, E. D. (1994). Patient and physician autonomy: Conflicting rights and obligations in the physician-patient relationship. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy. 10(1). Available at: http://scholarship.law.edu/jchlp/vol10/iss1/8 Accessed 26 Jan 2014.

  • Secker, B. (1999) The appearance of kant’s deontology in contemporary kantianism: concepts of patient autonomy in bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 24(1), 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skuter, P. (2012). When a health professional refuses: Legal and regulatory limits on conscientious objection to the provision of abortion care. Chapel Hill: IPAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggelbout, A. M., Molewijk, A. C., Otten, W., Timmermans, D. R. M., van Bockel, J. H., & Kievit, J. (2004). Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: A study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirrat, G. M., & Gill, R. (2005). Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 127–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Nuremberg Code from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10.Nuremberg. October 1946–April 1949. U.S. G.P.O. 1949–1953. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, J. K., & Klein, E. P. (2003). The story of bioethics: From seminal works to contemporary explorations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1994b). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushe, H., & Singer, P. (2013b). A companion to bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mappes, T., & De Grazia, D. (2005). Biomedical ethics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill,O. (2002b). Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Mfutso-Bengo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Manda-Taylor, L., Masiye, F., Mfutso-Bengo, J. (2015). Autonomy. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_460-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_460-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics