Skip to main content

Biological Citizenship

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

The concept of biological citizenship was introduced in the early 2000s to denote new forms of subjectivation and collective action on the basis of shared biological traits. Biomedical information opens up new opportunities for collectivization and biosociality and subsequently allows for collectively claiming rights, access to social welfare, and other forms of public support. Biological citizenship emphasizes the importance of patients’ associations, disease advocacy organizations, and self-help groups that are giving rise to new forms of public participation and involvement in the political and public domain. The focus is on the extension of rights, the emergence of new possibilities of participation, the empowerment of the individual, and the choice-enhancing options of the new genetics. However, there is also a negative side to biological citizenship with the potential for exclusion and restriction of citizenship rights based on biological traits. This entry introduces the concept of biological citizenship and discusses its merits and potential issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aas, K. F. (2011). “Crimmigrant” bodies and bona fide travelers: Surveillance, citizenship and global governance. Theoretical Criminology, 15(3), 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck, R. (1994). Transnational citizenship: Membership and rights in international migration. Aldershot: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2007). The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life: Lessons from the French Association of neuromuscular disease patients. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(2), 230–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (2007). Inclusion: The politics of difference in medical research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, R. (2008). Biological citizenship at the periphery: Parenting children with genetic disorders. New Genetics and Society, 27(3), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, D., Rapp, R., & Taussig, K.-S. (2004). Genetic citizenship. In D. Nugent & J. Vincent (Eds.), A companion to the anthropology of politics (pp. 152–167). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, T., & Lemke, T. (2014). Biological citizenship reconsidered: The use of DNA analysis by immigration authorities in Germany. Science, Technology & Human Values, 39(4), 488–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A. (2003). Genetics and citizenship. Society, 40(6), 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petryna, A. (2013). Life exposed: Biological citizens after Chernobyl (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (1996). Artificiality and enlightenment: From sociobiology to biosociality. In Essays on the anthropology of reason (pp. 91–111). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, S., & Tutton, R. (2010). Life, science, and biopower. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 711–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reubi, D. (2010). Blood donors, development and modernisation: Configurations of biological sociality and citizenship in post-colonial Singapore. Citizenship Studies, 14(5), 473–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N., & Novas, C. (2005). Biological citizenship. In S. J. Collier & A. Ong (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 439–463). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehling, P. (2011). Biology, citizenship and the government of biomedicine: Exploring the concept of biology citizenship. In U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, & T. Lemke (Eds.), Governmentality. Current issues and future challenges (pp. 225–246). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Fahrmeir, A. (2008). Citizenship: The rise and fall of a modern concept. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. F., Nyers, P., & Turner, B. S. (2008). Citizenship between past and future. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torsten Heinemann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Heinemann, T. (2015). Biological Citizenship. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_453-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_453-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics