Skip to main content

Bioethics: Clinical

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 110 Accesses

Abstract

Health-care providers face many important and challenging ethical dilemmas in their work environments on a daily basis. As professionals, they are accountable for their decisions to patients and their families, professional bodies, employers, and colleagues. Consequently they must be able to justify their decisions or recommendations. Clinical ethics refers to decision-making and reflection about the best choice(s) to make in the delivery of health care. In attempting to resolve ethical dilemmas in clinical practice, the conflict between two or more equally important but competing values must be identified, and the ethical dilemma must be articulated. This is an important starting point. Gathering as much data as possible is the next critical activity. Seeking medical information about the patient’s condition, prognosis, and alternatives is important. In addition, relevant health law, patient and family preferences, value systems of health-care workers, and the sociopolitical context must be explored. Engaging in ethical analysis using theories and principles is important. Finally, a decision is reached in collaboration with the patient and/or family, and policy is developed to facilitate decision-making in the future. Following a systematic process of data collection, reflection, and deliberation is essential. If, after this process, a decision cannot be reached, consultation with a clinical ethics committee is often necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, R. (1994). Medical ethics: Four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ, 309, 184–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuoid-Mason, D. (2005). Parental refusal of blood transfusions for minor children solely on religious grounds-the doctor’s dilemma resolved. SAMJ, 95(1), 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodley, K. (Ed.). (2011). Ethics, law and human rights: A South African perspective. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. R. (2009). World Medical Association Medical ethics manual. Ferney-Voltaire: World Health Communication Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A. R., Siegler, M., & Winslade, W. J. (2010). Clinical ethics: A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. New York: McGraw Hill Medical.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, B. (2013). Resolving ethical dilemmas: A guide for clinicians (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keymanthri Moodley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Moodley, K. (2015). Bioethics: Clinical. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_45-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_45-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics