Abstract
Artificial insemination is the oldest, well-established procedure in cases of untreatable male infertility which has been regulated and submitted to standard medical guidelines in most developed countries but not all.
Minimum requirements had to be respected by those running sperm banks in order to ensure safety and good medical practice for donors, recipients, and children born. The main medical risks of sperm donation are transferring infectious and genetic diseases; therefore, selection of sperm donors must include screening tests for both medical conditions. Anonymous sperm banking has been practiced for several decades. The present trend is to practice non-anonymous sperm donation because many donor-conceived persons have a desire and interest in finding out about where they came from.
References
Daniels, K., Feyles, V., Nisker, J., Perez-y-Perez, M., Newton, C., Parker, J. A., Tekpetey, F., & Haase, J. (2006). Sperm donation: Implications of Canada’s Assisted Human Reproduction Act 2004 for recipients, donors, health professionals, and institutions. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 7, 608–615.
De Brucker, M., Camus, M., Haentjens, P., Verheyen, G., Collins, J., & Tournaye, H. (2013). Assisted reproduction using donor spermatozoa in women aged 40 and above: The high road or the low road? Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 26, 577–585.
Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). (2013). Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 100, 45–49.
Flower, D. (2010). Assisted reproduction: Should egg and sperm donors be paid? The Journal of Family Health Care, 20, 69–71.
Human Fertilization Embryonic Authority (HFEA). (2008). Patients information. London: Human Fertilization Embryonic Authority.
Kop, P. A., van Wely, M., Mol, B. W., de Melker, A. A., Janssens, P. M., Arends, B., Curfs, M. H., Kortman, M., Nap, A., Rijnders, E., Roovers, J. P., Ruis, H., Simons, A. H., Repping, S., van der Veen, F., & Mochtar, M. H. (2015). Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: A cohort study. Human Reproduction, 30, 503–507.
Lampic, C., Skoog Svanberg, A., & Sydsjö, G. (2014). Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors. Human Reproduction, 9, 1978–1986.
Meirow, D., & Schenker, J. G. (1997). The current status of sperm donation in assisted reproduction technology: Ethical and legal considerations. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 10, 133–138.
Mor-Yosef, S., & Schenker, J. G. (1995). Sperm donation in Israel. Human Reproduction, 10, 965–967.
Pennings, G. (1995). Should donors have the right to decide who receives their gametes? Human Reproduction, 10, 2736–2740.
Schenker, J. G. (2005). Assisted reproductive practice: Religious perspectives. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 10, 310–319.
Schenker, J. G., & Cain, J. M. (2004). FIGO committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women’s Health. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 86, 267–275.
Further Readings
Schenker, J. G. (2011). Ethical dilemmas in assisted reproductive technologies. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Schenker, J.G. (2015). Assisted Reproductive Technology: Artificial Insemination. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_29-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_29-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities