Skip to main content

Animal Ethics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

The transformation of farm animals into industry-produced “biomachines” explains that the plight of animals worldwide has never been more serious than it is today. The description of the abuse of animals raised for food and the denunciation of the painful death they experience in slaughterhouses were the starting point of the animal movement in the 1970s. Promoting activism as well as academic studies, this movement, which first brought analytical ethics, and particularly utilitarianism, to bear on many animal welfare issues, goes hand in hand with the rejection of speciesism. Coined in 1971, this word suggests that membership in the Homo sapiens species is not a sufficient measure of moral worth. Animal ethics is an inquiry into the criteria that are decisive to grant a being moral consideration and evaluate the rightness or wrongness of some practices involving animals. Although Peter Singer and Tom Regan do not have the same arguments, they both provide an alternative to speciesism by referring to some value-laden labels that pertain to a cognitive ontology. This is why many ethicists coming from different countries are trying today to think through the animal question in order to overcome the dichotomies human/man, body/mind, and nature/culture we find in humanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, C. J., & Donovan, J. (Eds.). (1995). Animals & women: Feminist theoretical explorations. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, S. J., & Botzler, R. G. (Eds.). (2008). The animal ethics reader. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1968). Principles of morals and legislation. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. B. (1999). Genesis and John Muir. In J. B. Callicott (Ed.), Beyond the land ethic: Essays in the environmental philosophy. Albany: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calorco, M. (2008). Zoographies: The question of the animal from Heidegger to Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri, P., & Singer, P. (Eds.). (1993). The great ape project: Equality beyond humanity. New York: St Martin’s Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1991). Eating well or the calculation of the subject: An interview with Jacques Derrida (trans: Connor, P., & Ronnell, A.). In E. Cadava, P. Connor, & J.-L. Nancy (Eds.), Who comes after the subject? (pp. 96–119). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I am (trans: Wills, D.). New York: Fordham University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J., & Roudinesco, E. (2004). Violence against animals (trans: Fort, J.). In For what tomorrow? (pp. 62–76). Standford: Standford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., & Donaldson, S. (2011). Zoopolis. A political theory of animal right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelluchon, C. (2011). Eléments pour une éthique de la vulnérabilité. Les hommes, les animaux, la nature. Paris: Le Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelluchon, C. (2015). Les Nourritures. Philosophie du corps politique. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (2004). Empty cages: Facing the challenge of animal rights. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, S. P. (2012). The evolutionary basis for animal research. In J. R. Garrett (Ed.), The ethics of animal research: Exploring the controversy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (Ed.). (2006). In defense of animals: The second wave. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (2009). Animal liberation (4th ed.). New York/London: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Coetzee, J.-M. (1999). Elizabeth Costello. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francione, G. L. (1995). Animals, property, and the law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCance, D. (2013). Critical animal studies. An introduction. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge/London: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corine Pelluchon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Pelluchon, C. (2015). Animal Ethics. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_19-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_19-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics