Skip to main content

Ageism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

This entry examines the relevance of the concept of ageism for bioethics. Ageism is defined as the display of negative attitudes or behavior toward individuals or groups based on their age, which results in age discrimination. After a brief description of the historical context, two concepts of ageism are distinguished: a general one and a more specific one. The latter concerns negative stereotypes and age discrimination of older people, which is the focus here. Following a brief outline of the ethical and legal framework of criticizing ageism, the main areas of bioethical concern are analyzed. Individual medical staffs may have negative stereotypes about older people, which could result in discrimination and disadvantages in health care. Another main area is the health-care system itself, because the public perception of older people as a burden on social services could generate repeated requests for age-based rationing, which can have ageist elements. A major field, which might benefit from population aging as well, is antiaging medicine, the representatives of which have been repeatedly accused of ageism. The exclusion of older people from participation in medical research may also partially constitute a result of ageism. Finally, the importance of countering ageism from a global health perspective is justified and highlighted in the conclusion of this entry, which may be of particular relevance for bioethics and training future medical staff in medical ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bernard, M. A., McAuley, W. J., Belzer, J. A., & Neal, K. S. (2003). An evaluation of a low-intensity intervention to introduce medical students to healthy older people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51(3), 419–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. N. (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9(4 Part 1), 243–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. N. (2005). Foreword. In E. B. Palmore, L. G. Branch & D. K. Harris (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ageism (pp. xviii, 347 p.). Binghamton: Haworth Pastoral Press/Haworth Reference Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bytheway, B. (2005). Ageism. In M. L. Johnson (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of age and ageing (pp. xxvi, 744 p.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannefer, D., & Phillipson, C. (2010). The Sage handbook of social gerontology. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1970). La vieillesse. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defanti, C. A., Tiezzi, A., Gasparini, M., Gasperini, M., Congedo, M., Tiraboschi, P., . . . Palliative Care in Neurology Study Group of the Italian Society of Neurology. (2007). Ethical questions in the treatment of subjects with dementia. Part I. Respecting autonomy: Awareness, competence and behavioural disorders. Neurological Sciences, 28(4), 216–231. doi:10.1007/s10072-006-0825-x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, L. M. (2010). Just caring: In defense of limited age-based healthcare rationing. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19(1), 27–37. doi:10.1017/S0963180109990223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2005). It’s not NICE to discriminate. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(7), 373–375. doi:10.1136/jme.2005.012906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, J., & Cutler, S. J. (2005). Ethical issues. In E. B. Palmore, L. G. Branch & D. K. Harris (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ageism (pp. xviii, 347 p.). Binghamton: Haworth Pastoral Press/Haworth Reference Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt, L. (2009). Dignity in care for older people. Chichester/Ames: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palmore, E. (2005). Three decades of research on ageism. Generations, 29(3), 87–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seshamani, M., & Gray, A. (2004). Time to death and health expenditure: An improved model for the impact of demographic change on health care costs. Age and Ageing, 33(6), 556–561. doi:10.1093/ageing/afh187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thielke, S., Sale, J., & Reid, M. C. (2012). Aging: Are these 4 pain myths complicating care? The Journal of Family Practice, 61(11), 666–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2014). Global issues – Ageing. Retrieved October 14, 2014, from http://www.un.org/en/globalissues/ageing

  • Vincent, J. A. (2006). Ageing contested: Anti-ageing science and the cultural construction of old age. Sociology, 40(4), 681–698. doi:10.1177/0038038506065154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • McDaniel, S. A., & Zimmer, Z. (2013). Global ageing in the twenty-first century: Challenges, opportunities and implications. Farnham, Surrey/Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. D. (2002). Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmore, E. B., et al. (2005). Encyclopedia of ageism. Binghamton: Haworth Pastoral Press/Haworth Reference Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Jörg Ehni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ehni, HJ. (2014). Ageism. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_13-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_13-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics