Abstract
What is today recognized as a discursive approach to policy might appear to be a fashionable innovation; however, it has been cultivated over time as the field of language planning and policy (LPP) has matured. This contribution traces the early foundations of an approach to LPP that focuses on the interplay between human agency and societally circulating (language) ideologies. It examines work that has focused on national policies as well as research focused on policy in practice, including how language practies can be understood as de facto language policy. Challenges related to making connections between policy and practice are also discussed. Finally, future prospects for researching language policy with a discourse analytic orientation are considered.
References
Amir, A. (2013). Doing language policy. Doctoral dissertation, Linköping University, Linköping. Available from http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A660735&dswid=-666
Arias, M. B., & Faltis, C. (Eds.). (2012). Implementing educational language policy in Arizona: Legal, historical and current practices in SEI. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Kryzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19, 273–305.
Baldauf, R. B. (2008). Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context. In A. J. Liddicoat & R. B. Baldauf (Eds.), Language planning in local contexts (pp. 18–41). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.
Blommaert, J. (1996). Language planning as a discourse on language and society: The linguistic ideology of a scholarly tradition. Language Problems and Language Planning, 20(3), 199–222.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Compton, S. E. (2013). Implementing language policy for deaf students in a Texas school district. International Multilingual Research Journal, 7(2), 138–154.
Davis, K. A. (2014). Engaged language policy and practices. Language Policy, 13, 83–100.
Dressler, R. (2015). Sign geist: Promoting bilingualism through the linguistic landscape of school signage. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(1), 128–145.
Fishman, J. A. (1972). The relationship between micro- and macro-sociolinguistics in the study of who speaks what language to whom and when. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 15–32). New York: Penguin Books.
Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. (2015). Applying corpus linguistics to language policy. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 107–117). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Haugen, E. (1983). The implementation of corpus planning: Theory and practice. In J. Cobarrubias & J. A. Fishman (Eds.), Progress in language planning: International perspectives (pp. 269–290). Berlin: Mouton.
Heath, S. B. (1971). Telling tongues: Language policy in Mexico, colony to nation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hornberger, N. H. (1989). Bilingual education and language maintenance. Dordrecht: Foris.
Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2011). The ethnography of language policy. In T. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 273–289). London: Routledge.
Hult, F. M. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 202, 7–24.
Hult, F. M. (2015). Making policy connections across scales using nexus analysis. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 215–231). Malden: Wiley.
Hult, F. M., & Pietikäinen, S. (2014). Shaping discourses of multilingualism through a language ideological debate: The case of Swedish in Finland. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(1), 1–20.
Hymes, D. H. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Johnson, D. C. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language policy. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(4), 267–279.
Johnson, D. C. (2013). Language policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Liddicoat, A. J., & Taylor-Leech, K. (2014). Micro language planning for multilingual education: Agency in local contexts. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(3), 237–244.
Martin-Jones, M. (2011). Language policies, multilingual classrooms: Resonances across continents. In F. M. Hult & K. A. King (Eds.), Educational linguistics in practice: Applying the local globally and the global locally (pp. 3–15). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
McCarty, T. (Ed.). (2011). Ethnography and language policy. London: Routledge.
McCarty, T., Collins, J., & Hopson, R. (2011). Dell Hymes and the new language policy studies: Update from an underdeveloped country. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 42(4), 335–363.
Menken, K. (2008). English language learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Menken, K., & GarcÃa, O. (Eds.). (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. London: Routledge.
Milani, T. (2009). At the intersection between power and knowledge: An analysis of a Swedish policy document on language testing for citizenship. Journal of Language and Politics, 8(2), 287–304.
Neustupný, J. V., & Nekvapil, J. (2003). Language management in the Czech Republic. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4(3–4), 181–366.
Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196–213.
Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the ‘language-as-resource’ discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the USA. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 348–368.
Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.
Schiffman, H. F. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. London: Routledge.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis. London: Routledge.
Shohamy, E. (2009). Language policy as experiences. Language Problems and Language Planning, 33(2), 185–189.
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Spolsky, B. (2005). Is language policy applied linguistics? In P. Bruthiaux, D. Atkinson, W. G. Eggington, W. Grabe, & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics (pp. 26–36). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sutton, M., & Levinson, B. A. U. (2001). Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy. Westport: Ablex.
Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. New York: Longman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hult, F.M. (2015). Discursive Approaches to Policy. In: Wortham, S., Kim, D., May, S. (eds) Discourse and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02322-9_22-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02322-9_22-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02322-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education