Skip to main content

Discursive Approaches to Policy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Discourse and Education

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

  • 302 Accesses

Abstract

What is today recognized as a discursive approach to policy might appear to be a fashionable innovation; however, it has been cultivated over time as the field of language planning and policy (LPP) has matured. This contribution traces the early foundations of an approach to LPP that focuses on the interplay between human agency and societally circulating (language) ideologies. It examines work that has focused on national policies as well as research focused on policy in practice, including how language practies can be understood as de facto language policy. Challenges related to making connections between policy and practice are also discussed. Finally, future prospects for researching language policy with a discourse analytic orientation are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amir, A. (2013). Doing language policy. Doctoral dissertation, Linköping University, Linköping. Available from http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A660735&dswid=-666

  • Arias, M. B., & Faltis, C. (Eds.). (2012). Implementing educational language policy in Arizona: Legal, historical and current practices in SEI. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Kryzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19, 273–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldauf, R. B. (2008). Rearticulating the case for micro language planning in a language ecology context. In A. J. Liddicoat & R. B. Baldauf (Eds.), Language planning in local contexts (pp. 18–41). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (1996). Language planning as a discourse on language and society: The linguistic ideology of a scholarly tradition. Language Problems and Language Planning, 20(3), 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, S. E. (2013). Implementing language policy for deaf students in a Texas school district. International Multilingual Research Journal, 7(2), 138–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. A. (2014). Engaged language policy and practices. Language Policy, 13, 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, R. (2015). Sign geist: Promoting bilingualism through the linguistic landscape of school signage. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(1), 128–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, J. A. (1972). The relationship between micro- and macro-sociolinguistics in the study of who speaks what language to whom and when. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 15–32). New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. (2015). Applying corpus linguistics to language policy. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 107–117). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, E. (1983). The implementation of corpus planning: Theory and practice. In J. Cobarrubias & J. A. Fishman (Eds.), Progress in language planning: International perspectives (pp. 269–290). Berlin: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. B. (1971). Telling tongues: Language policy in Mexico, colony to nation. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N. H. (1989). Bilingual education and language maintenance. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2011). The ethnography of language policy. In T. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 273–289). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F. M. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 202, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F. M. (2015). Making policy connections across scales using nexus analysis. In F. M. Hult & D. C. Johnson (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 215–231). Malden: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hult, F. M., & Pietikäinen, S. (2014). Shaping discourses of multilingualism through a language ideological debate: The case of Swedish in Finland. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. H. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language policy. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(4), 267–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2013). Language policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liddicoat, A. J., & Taylor-Leech, K. (2014). Micro language planning for multilingual education: Agency in local contexts. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(3), 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Jones, M. (2011). Language policies, multilingual classrooms: Resonances across continents. In F. M. Hult & K. A. King (Eds.), Educational linguistics in practice: Applying the local globally and the global locally (pp. 3–15). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, T. (Ed.). (2011). Ethnography and language policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, T., Collins, J., & Hopson, R. (2011). Dell Hymes and the new language policy studies: Update from an underdeveloped country. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 42(4), 335–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menken, K. (2008). English language learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menken, K., & García, O. (Eds.). (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milani, T. (2009). At the intersection between power and knowledge: An analysis of a Swedish policy document on language testing for citizenship. Journal of Language and Politics, 8(2), 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neustupný, J. V., & Nekvapil, J. (2003). Language management in the Czech Republic. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4(3–4), 181–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the ‘language-as-resource’ discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the USA. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 348–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, H. F. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (2009). Language policy as experiences. Language Problems and Language Planning, 33(2), 185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (2005). Is language policy applied linguistics? In P. Bruthiaux, D. Atkinson, W. G. Eggington, W. Grabe, & V. Ramanathan (Eds.), Directions in applied linguistics (pp. 26–36). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, M., & Levinson, B. A. U. (2001). Policy as practice: Toward a comparative sociocultural analysis of educational policy. Westport: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis M. Hult .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hult, F.M. (2015). Discursive Approaches to Policy. In: Wortham, S., Kim, D., May, S. (eds) Discourse and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02322-9_22-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02322-9_22-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02322-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics