Skip to main content

Inductive Transfer

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining

Abstract

We describe different scenarios where a learning mechanism is capable of acquiring experience on a source task, and subsequently exploit such experience on a target task. The core ideas behind this ability to transfer knowledge from one task to another have been studied in the machine learning literature under different titles and perspectives. Here we describe some of them under the names of inductive transfer, transfer learning, multitask learning, meta-searching, meta-generalization, and domain adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  • Baxter J (2000) A model of inductive learning bias. J Artif Intell Res 12:149–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David S, Blitzer J, Crammer K, Pereira F (2007) Analysis of representations for domain adaptation. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 19:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David S, Blitzer J, Crammer K, Kulesza A, Pereira F, Wortman J (2010) A theory of learning from different domains. Mach Learn Spec Issue Learn Mult Sources 79:151–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazdil P, Giraud-Carrier C, Soares C, Vilalta R (2009) Metalearning: applications to data mining. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruana R (1993) Multitask learning: a knowledge-based source of inductive bias. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on machine learning (ICML), Amherst, pp 41-48

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Weinberger KQ, Blitzer J (2011) Co-training for domain adaptation. In: Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS), Granada

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai W, Yang Q, Xue G, Yu Y (2007) Boosting for transfer learning. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on machine learning (ICML), Corvallis, pp 193–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Daumé H, Marcu D (2006) Domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. J Mach Learn Res 26:102–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Daumé H, Kumar A, Saha A (2010) Co-regularization based semi-supervised domain adaptation. In: Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS), Whistler

    Google Scholar 

  • Evgeniou T, Micchelli CA, Pontil M (2005) Learning multiple tasks with kernel methods. J Mach Learn Res 6:615–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Glorot X, Bordes A, Bengio Y (2011) Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: a deep learning approach. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML), Bellevue, pp 513–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansour Y, Mohri M, Rostamizadeh A (2009) Domain adaptation with multiple sources. In: Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS), Whistler, pp 1041–1048

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihalkova L, Huynh T, Mooney RJ (2007) Mapping and revising markov logic networks for transfer learning. In: Proceedings of the 22nd AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vancouver, pp 608–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger D, Reid M, Brodie M, de Salvo Braz R (2002) Cross-training and its application to skill-mining. IBM Syst J 41(3):449–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt L, Thrun S (1997) Second special issue on inductive transfer. Mach Learn 28:4175

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinonero-Candela J, Sugiyama M, Schwaighofer A, Lawrence ND (2009) Dataset shift in machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Raina R, Ng AY, Koller D (2006) Constructing informative priors using transfer learning. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on machine learning (ICML), Pittsburgh, pp 713–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid M (2004) Improving rule evaluation using multitask learning. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on ILP, Porto, pp 252–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidhuber J (1997) Shifting inductive bias with success-story algorithm, adaptive levin search, and incremental self-improvement. Mach Learn 28:105–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl I (1995) Predicate invention in inductive logic programming. In: De Raedt L (ed) Advances in inductive logic programming. IOS Press, Amsterdam/Washington, DC, pp 34–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Storkey A (2009) When training and test sets are different. In: Quinonero-Candela J, Sugiyama M, Schwaighofer A, Lawrence ND (eds) Dataset shift in machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 3–28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Vilalta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Vilalta, R., Giraud-Carrier, C., Brazdil, P., Soares, C. (2016). Inductive Transfer. In: Sammut, C., Webb, G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_138-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7502-7_138-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7502-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics