Abstract
Immunoglobulin new antigen receptors (IgNARs) from sharks are a distinct class of immune receptors, consisting of homodimers with no associated light chains. Antigen binding is encapsulated within single VNAR immunoglobulin domains of 13–14 kDa in size. This small size and single domain format means that they exhibit considerable stability and are readily produced in heterologous protein expression systems. In this chapter, I describe the history and discovery of IgNARs, the development of VNAR biotechnology, and highlight important factors in VNAR protein production.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Nuttall SD, Irving RA, Hudson PJ (2000) Immunoglobulin VH domains and beyond: design and selection of single-domain binding and targeting reagents. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 1:253–263
Hamers-Casterman C et al (1993) Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature 363:446–448
Desmyter A et al (1996) Crystal structure of a camel single-domain VH antibody fragment in complex with lysozyme. Nat Struct Biol 3:803–811
Greenberg AS et al (1995) A new antigen receptor gene family that undergoes rearrangement and extensive somatic diversification in sharks. Nature 374:168–173
Roux KH et al (1998) Structural analysis of the nurse shark (new) antigen receptor (NAR): molecular convergence of NAR and unusual mammalian immunoglobulins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:11804–11809
Rumfelt LL et al (2004) Unprecedented multiplicity of Ig transmembrane and secretory mRNA forms in the cartilaginous fish. J Immunol 173:1129–1139
Dooley H, Flajnik MF, Porter AJ (2003) Selection and characterization of naturally occurring single-domain (IgNAR) antibody fragments from immunized sharks by phage display. Mol Immunol 40:25–33
Nuttall SD et al (2001) Isolation of the new antigen receptor from wobbegong sharks, and use as a scaffold for the display of protein loop libraries. Mol Immunol 38:313–326
Rumfelt LL et al (2002) The development of primary and secondary lymphoid tissues in the nurse shark Ginglymostoma cirratum: B-cell zones precede dendritic cell immigration and T-cell zone formation during ontogeny of the spleen. Scand J Immunol 56:130–148
Nuttall SD et al (2003) Isolation and characterization of an IgNAR variable domain specific for the human mitochondrial translocase receptor Tom70. Eur J Biochem 270:3543–3554
Diaz M et al (2002) Structural analysis, selection, and ontogeny of the shark new antigen receptor (IgNAR): identification of a new locus preferentially expressed in early development. Immunogenetics 54:501–512
Streltsov VA, Carmichael JA, Nuttall SD (2005) Structure of a shark IgNAR antibody variable domain and modeling of an early-developmental isotype. Protein Sci 14:2901–2909
Diaz M et al (1999) Mutational pattern of the nurse shark antigen receptor gene (NAR) is similar to that of mammalian Ig genes and to spontaneous mutations in evolution: the translesion synthesis model of somatic hypermutation. Int Immunol 11:825–833
Dooley H, Flajnik MF (2006) Antibody repertoire development in cartilaginous fish. Dev Comp Immunol 30:43–56
Diaz M, Greenberg AS, Flajnik MF (1998) Somatic hypermutation of the new antigen receptor gene (NAR) in the nurse shark does not generate the repertoire: possible role in antigen-driven reactions in the absence of germinal centers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:14343–14348
De Genst E et al (2005) Strong in vivo maturation compensates for structurally restricted H3 loops in antibody repertoires. J Biol Chem 280:14114–14121
Streltsov VA et al (2004) Structural evidence for evolution of shark Ig new antigen receptor variable domain antibodies from a cell-surface receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:12444–12449
Nuttall SD et al (2004) Selection and affinity maturation of IgNAR variable domains targeting Plasmodium falciparum AMA1. Proteins 55:187–197
Stanfield RL et al (2004) Crystal structure of a shark single-domain antibody V region in complex with lysozyme. Science 305:1770–1773
Streltsov V, Nuttall S (2005) Do sharks have a new antibody lineage? Immunol Lett 97:159–160
Saerens D et al (2005) Identification of a universal VHH framework to graft non-canonical antigen-binding loops of camel single-domain antibodies. J Mol Biol 352:597–607
Riechmann L, Muyldermans S (1999) Single domain antibodies: comparison of camel VH and camelised human VH domains. J Immunol Methods 231:25–38
Simmons DP et al (2008) Shark IgNAR antibody mimotopes target a murine immunoglobulin through extended CDR3 loop structures. Proteins 71:119–130
MacCallum RM, Martin AC, Thornton JM (1996) Antibody-antigen interactions: contact analysis and binding site topography. J Mol Biol 262:732–745
Dooley H et al (2006) First molecular and biochemical analysis of in vivo affinity maturation in an ectothermic vertebrate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:1846–1851
Stanfield RL et al (2007) Maturation of shark single-domain (IgNAR) antibodies: evidence for induced-fit binding. J Mol Biol 367:358–372
Henderson KA et al (2007) Structure of an IgNAR-AMA1 complex: targeting a conserved hydrophobic cleft broadens malarial strain recognition. Structure 15:1452–1466
Engberg J et al (1995) Phage-display libraries of murine and human antibody Fab fragments. Methods Mol Biol 51:355–376
Nuttall SD et al (2002) A naturally occurring NAR variable domain binds the Kgp protease from Porphyromonas gingivalis. FEBS Lett 516:80–86
Coia G, Hudson PJ, Lilley GG (1996) Construction of recombinant extended single-chain antibody peptide conjugates for use in the diagnosis of HIV-1 and HIV-2. J Immunol Methods 192:13–23
Liu JL et al (2007) Selection of cholera toxin specific IgNAR single-domain antibodies from a naive shark library. Mol Immunol 44:1775–1783
Liu JL, Anderson GP, Goldman ER (2007) Isolation of anti-toxin single domain antibodies from a semi-synthetic spiny dogfish shark display library. BMC Biotechnol 7:78
Fennell BJ et al (2010) Dissection of the IgNAR V domain: molecular scanning and orthologue database mining define novel IgNAR hallmarks and affinity maturation mechanisms. J Mol Biol 400:155–170
Kopsidas G et al (2006) In vitro improvement of a shark IgNAR antibody by Qbeta replicase mutation and ribosome display mimics in vivo affinity maturation. Immunol Lett 107:163–168
Hosse RJ et al (2009) Kinetic screening of antibody-Im7 conjugates by capture on a colicin E7 DNase domain using optical biosensors. Anal Biochem 385:346–357
Simmons DP et al (2006) Dimerisation strategies for shark IgNAR single domain antibody fragments. J Immunol Methods 315:171–184
Criscitiello MF, Saltis M, Flajnik MF (2006) An evolutionarily mobile antigen receptor variable region gene: doubly rearranging NAR-TcR genes in sharks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:5036–5041
Nuttall SD, Walsh RB (2008) Display scaffolds: protein engineering for novel therapeutics. Curr Opin Pharmacol 8:609–615
Acknowledgements
I thank all my colleagues and collaborators who have worked with me to develop the VNAR technology. The author acts as a consultant to AdAlta Pty Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Nuttall, S.D. (2012). Overview and Discovery of IgNARs and Generation of VNARs. In: Saerens, D., Muyldermans, S. (eds) Single Domain Antibodies. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 911. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-968-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-968-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-967-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-968-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols