Skip to main content

Field Studies Demonstrating the Efficacy of Bioremediation in Marine Environments

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology Protocols

Part of the book series: Springer Protocols Handbooks ((SPH))

Abstract

The ultimate fate of most oil released into the biosphere is biodegradation. Yet oil lacks some of the essential nutrients for microbial life, and its biodegradation can be limited by the availability of such nutrients from the local environment. Bioremediation of oil on shorelines aims to at least partially alleviate this limitation by the judicious application of fertilizers. Bioremediation played a central role in the response to the Exxon Valdez spill in Prince William Sound, AK, being applied to more than 120 km of shoreline. This short paper describes the program designed by Exxon, the USEPA, and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation to assess the environmental safety and efficacy of bioremediation as it was being carried out in the Sound. It provides a prototype if monitoring shoreline bioremediation needs to be done in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nauman SA (1991) Shoreline cleanup: equipment and operations. In: 1991 international oil spill conference. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, pp 141–147

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pritchard PH, Mueller JG, Rogers JC, Kremer FV, Glaser JA (1992) Oil spill bioremediation: experiences, lessons and results from the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska. Biodegradation 3:315–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. USEPA (2014) Alphabetical list of NCP product schedule (products available for use during an oil spill). http://www2.epa.gov/emergency-response/alphabetical-list-ncp-product-schedule-products-available-use-during-oil-spill

  4. Pritchard PH (1991) Bioremediation as a technology; experiences with the Exxon Valdez spill. J Hazard Mater 28:115–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ladousse A, Tramier B (1991) Results of 12 years of research in spilled oil bioremediation: Inipol EAP22. In: 1991 international oil spill conference. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, pp 577–582

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gautier JC, Sirvins A, Tellier J, Tramier B (1984) Microemulsion of nutrient substances. US Patent 4,460,692

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prince RC, Bragg JR (1997) Shoreline bioremediation following the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska. Biorem J 1:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Limpert E, Stahel WA, Abbt M (2001) Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. Bioscience 51:341–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. National Research Council (1996) In situ bioremediation: when does it work? National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bragg JR, Prince RC, Harner EJ, Atlas RM (1994) Effectiveness of bioremediation for the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Nature 368:413–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Prince RC, Clark JR, Lindstrom JE, Butler EL, Brown EJ, Winter G, Grossman MJ, Parrish RR, Bare RE, Braddock JF, Steinhauer WG, Douglas GS, Kennedy JM, Barter PJ, Bragg JR, Harner EJ, Atlas RM (1994) Bioremediation of the Exxon Valdez oil spill: monitoring safety and efficacy. In: Hinchee RE, Alleman BC, Hoeppel RE, Miller RN (eds) Hydrocarbon remediation. Lewis, Boca Raton, pp 107–124

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prince RC, Bare RE, Garrett RM, Grossman MJ, Haith CE, Keim LG, Lee K, Holtom GJ, Lambert P, Sergy GA, Owens EH, Guénette CC (2003) Bioremediation of stranded oil on an Arctic shoreline. Spill Sci Technol Bull 8:303–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindstrom JE, Prince RC, Clark JR, Grossman MJ, Yeager TR, Braddock JF, Brown EJ (1991) Microbial populations and hydrocarbon biodegradation potentials in fertilized shoreline sediments affected by the T/V Exxon Valdez oil spill. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2514–2522

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Prince RC, Bare RE, George GN, Haith CE, Grossman MJ, Lute JR, Elmendorf DL, Minak-Bernero V, Senius JD, Keim LG, Chianelli RR, Hinton SM, Teal AR (1993) The effect of bioremediation on the microbial populations of oiled beaches in Prince William Sound, Alaska. In: 1993 international oil spill conference. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, pp 469–475

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miget RJ, Oppenheimer CH, Kator HI, LaRock PA (1969) Microbial degradation of normal paraffin hydrocarbons in crude oil. In: 1969 international oil spill conference. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, pp 327–331

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prince RC, Elmendorf DL, Lute JR, Hsu CS, Haith CE, Senius JD, Dechert GJ, Douglas GS, Butler EL (1994) 17α(H),21β(H)-hopane as a conserved internal marker for estimating the biodegradation of crude oil. Environ Sci Technol 28:142–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. USEPA (2002) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms, 5th edn, October 2002. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/cwa/wet/disk2_index.cfm

  18. Boufadel MC, Reeser P, Suidan MT, Wrenn BA, Cheng J, Du X, Huang TL, Venosa AD (1999) Optimal nitrate concentration for the biodegradation of n-heptadecane in a variably-saturated sand column. Environ Technol 20:191–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sihota NJ, Singurindy O, Mayer KU (2010) CO2-efflux measurements for evaluating source zone natural attenuation rates in a petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated aquifer. Environ Sci Technol 45:482–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Swannell RPJ, Mitchell D, Lethbridge G, Jones D, Heath D, Hagley M, Jones M, Petch S, Milne R, Croxford R, Lee K (1999) A field demonstration of the efficacy of bioremediation to treat oiled shorelines following the Sea Empress incident. Environ Technol 20:863–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Venosa AD, Suidan MT, Wrenn BA, Strohmeier KL, Haines JR, Eberhart BL, King D, Holder E (1996) Bioremediation of an experimental oil spill on the shoreline of Delaware Bay. Environ Sci Technol 30:1764–1775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger C. Prince .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Prince, R.C., Clark, J.R., Lindstrom, J.E. (2015). Field Studies Demonstrating the Efficacy of Bioremediation in Marine Environments. In: McGenity, T., Timmis, K., Nogales, B. (eds) Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology Protocols. Springer Protocols Handbooks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/8623_2015_172

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/8623_2015_172

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53110-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53111-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics