Skip to main content
Log in

Cyto-taxonomy and phylogeny of the oleaceae

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Anderson, Edgar A. 1937. Cytology in its relation to taxonomy. Bot. Rev.3: 335–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, A. 1931. Lunds Univ. Årsskr.277.

  • Bailey, L. H. 1938. Manual of cultivated plants. New York.

  • Baldwin, J. T., Jr. 1943. Polyploidy inSedum pulchellum—I. Cytogeography. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club70: 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G & Hooker, J. D. 1873–76. Genera plantarum, Vol. 2. London.

  • Blackburn, K. 1929. On the occurrence of sex chromosomes in flowering plants with some suggestions as to their origin. Proc. Internat. Congr. Plant Sci. Ithaca1: 299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgenstam, E. 1922. Zur Zytologie der GattungSyringa nebst Erörterungen über den Einfluss ausserer Faktoren auf die Kernteilungsvorgange. Arkiv. Bot.17: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, Wray M. 1940. Diploidy, polyploidy, and winter-hardiness relationships in the flowering plants. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1941. Chromosome number and winter hardiness in higher plants. Manuseript dissertation, University of Virginia.

  • Brown, W. L. 1937. A modified root tip smear technie. Stain Tech.12: 137–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkwood and Skipwith, Ltd. 1931. Nursery Notes. Gard. Chron. III89: 438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candolle, A. P. de. 1844. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis8: 273–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester, K. S. 1931. Graft-blight; a disease of Lilac related to the employment of certain understocks in propagation. Jour. Arnold Arb.12: 79–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, R. E. &Goodspeed, T. H. 1925. Interspecific hybridization in Nicotiana II. A tetraploidglutinosa-tabacum hybrid, an experimental verification of Winge’s hypothesis. Genetics10: 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. 1937. Recent advances in cytology. ed. 3. Philadelphia.

  • Decaisne, M. J. 1878. Monographie des genresLigustrum etSyringa. Nouv. Arch. Muséum II2: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermen, H. 1932. Chromosome number in the genusTilia. Jour. Arnold Arb.13: 49–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, Adolf & Gilg, Ernst. 1924. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Berlin.

  • Gaiser, L. O. 1926. A list of chromosome numbers in angiosperms. Genetica8: 401–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1930a. Chromosome numbers in angiosperms II. Bibliogr. Genet.6: 171–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1930b. Chromosome numbers in angiosperms III. Genetica12: 161–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1933. Chromosome numbers in angiosperms IV. Bibliogr. Genet.10: 105–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilg, E. F. 1901. Uebersicht ueber die Arten der OleaceengattungSchrebera Roxb. Bot. Jahrb.30: 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Asa. 1860. A revision of the genusForestiera. Proc. Am. Acad.4: 363–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Walton C. 1941. Phylogenetic and cytological studies in the Ranunculaceae. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. II31: 443–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms, H. 1919. Über die Blutenverhältnisse der bei uns im Freien angebauten Arten vonForestiera Poir. Mitt. Deuts. Dendr. Ges.28: 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, L. 1900. Crossings made at the natural history museum of Paris from 1887 to 1899. Jour. Royal Hort. Soc.24: 218–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Arthur Wilson. 1910. The genusMyxopyrum. Kew Bull.1910: 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Arthur M. 1931. Taxonomy of the flowering plants. New York and London.

  • Karpechenko, G. D. 1927. The production of polyploid gametes in hybrids. Hereditas9: 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblauch, E. 1895. Oleaceae.In: Engler, A. & Prantl, K., Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien42: 1–16.

  • ————— 1933. Revision der Oleaceengattung Haenianthus. Rep. Spee. Nov.34: 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobuski, Clarence E. 1932. Synopsis of the Chinese species ofJasminum. Jour. Arnold Arb.13: 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1939a. New and noteworthy species of AsiaticJasminum. Jour. Arnold Arb.20: 64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1939b. Further notes onJasminum. Jour. Arnold Arb.20: 403–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1940. The Oleaceae of New Guinea collected by L. J. Brass. Jour. Arnold Arb.21: 328–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine, E. 1900. Hybrids between the common lilae and the laeiniated Persian lilac. Jour. Royal Hort. Soc.24: 218–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingelscheim, A. 1907. Vorarbeiten zu einer Monographie die GattungFraxinus. Bot. Jahrb.40: 185–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1920. Oleaceae-Oleoideae-Fraxineae and Oleaceae-Oleoideae-Syringeae.In: Engler, A., Das Pflanzenreich 4243, parts 1, 2.

  • Mansfeld, R. 1924. Vorarbeiten zu einer Monographie der GattungLigustrum. Bot. Jahrb.59 (Bleiblatt 132): 19–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura, H. &Sutô, T. 1935. Jour. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Imp. Univ. V5: 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, Susan D. 1928. The lilae. New York.

  • Meyer, James R. 1943. Colchicine-Feulgen leaf smears. Stain Tech.18: 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müntzing, A. 1936. The evolutionary significance of autopolyploidy. Hereditas21: 263–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakai, Takenoshin. 1919. Genus novum Oleacearum in Corea media inventum. Bot. Mag. Tokyo33: 153–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, Goichi. 1937. Cytological studies of some dioecious plants. Cytologia, Fujii-Festschr. 282–292.

  • Newberry, Percy E. 1937. On some species of the genusOlea and the original home of the cultivated olive tree. Proc. Linn. Soc.150: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, W. C. F. &Pellew, C. 1929.Primula Kewensis and its derivatives. Jour. Gen.20: 405–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mara, Joseph. 1930. Chromosome numbers in the genusForsythia. Jour. Arnold Arb.11: 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehder, Alfred. 1917. The genusFraxinus in New Mexico and Arizona. Proc. Am. Acad.53: 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1922. New species, varieties and combinations from the herbarium and collections of the Arnold Arboretum. Jour. Arnold Arb.3: 11–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1940. Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs. New York.

  • Sax, Karl. 1930. Chromosome number and behavior in the genusSyringa. Jour. Arnold Arb.11: 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1931. The origin and relationship of the Pomoideae. Jour. Arnold Arb.12: 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1932. Chromosome relationships in the Pomoideae. Jour. Arnold Arb.13: 363–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1933. The origin of the Pomoideae. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.30: 147–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, Karl, &Abbe, Ernest C. 1932. Chromosome numbers and the anatomy of the secondary xylem in the Oleaceae. Jour. Arnold Arb.13: 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinotô, Y. 1929. Chromosome studies in some dioecious plants, with special reference to the allosomes. Cytologia1: 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, John K. 1933. Manual of the southeastern flora. New York.

  • Smith, W. W. 1916. Note onParasyringa, a new genus of Oleaceae. Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinb.27: 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, L. J. 1929. Chromosome number and the mutation rate inAvena andTriticum. Proc. Nat. Acad.15: 876–881.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., Jr. 1940. The significance of polypoloidy in plant evolution. Am. Nat.74: 54–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steyermark, Julian A. 1932. A revision of the genusMenodora. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.19: 87–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, Toranosuke. 1931. A list of chromosome numbers in angiospermous plants. Bot. Mag. Tokyo45: 353–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1936. Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo12: 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. T. 1940. The aceto-carmine method for fruit material. Stain Tech.15: 167–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tischler, G. 1908. Zellstudien an sterilen Bastardpflanzen. Arch. Zellforsch.1: 33–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1926. Über die Verwendung der Chromosomenzahl für Phylogenetische Probleme bei den Angiosperm. Biol. Zentralb.48: 321–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1930. Über die Bastardnatur des persischen Flieders. Zeits. Bot.23: 150–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1931. Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen. Tabulae Biologicae7: 109–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1935. Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen. Tabulae Biologicae11: 281–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1936. Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen. Tabulae Biologicae12: 57–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1938. Pflanzliche Chromosomen-Zahlen. Tabulae Biologicae16: 162–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, G. Friedrich Th. 1928. Vergleichend-morphologische Untersuchungen über die Oleacecnblüte. Planta6: 591–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesmael, Alfred. 1892. Monographie des espèces du genreFraxinus. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg.31: 69–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, W. von. 1933. Züchter5: 280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, Thomas W. 1933. Chromosome number and relationship in Magnoliales. Jour. Arnold Arb.14: 376–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirkle, C. 1937. Aceto-carmine mounting media. Science85: 528.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Appreciation is expressed for the suggestions and criticisms by Dr. Orland E. White, under whose suggestion this investigation has been carried out, and to Dr. Ladley Husted for reading and criticizing the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, H. Cyto-taxonomy and phylogeny of the oleaceae. Brittonia 5, 337–367 (1945). https://doi.org/10.2307/2804889

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2804889

Keywords

Navigation