Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal and Spatial Concepts in Child Language: Conventional and Configurational

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to study the temporal and spatial systems of child language. Configurational time/space refers to the location of events/objects relative to referent events/objects (e.g., before/after or across/along) and conventional time/space refers to the specification of cycles/directions and the measurement of duration/distance (e.g., winter/fall or North/South). The research was designed to determine how configurational and conventional notions of time and space emerge in the child's language. The average age of the children in the cross-sectional design was: 3;9, 6;7, and 8;7. The children received a comprehension test that required them to match a sentence with a picture. In general, configurational contrasts were easier to comprehend than conventional contrasts, and, within the configurational problems, location requiring a single referent was easier than location requiring multiple referents. There was no overall difference between temporal and spatial dimensions. The role of conceptual development was discussed within the context of a comparison between first and second language acquisition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ames, L. B. (1946). The development of the sense of time in the young child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 68, 97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, A., & Carroll, M. (1997). The acquisition of spatial relations in second language, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. (1981). Notes for the Nijmegen workshop. MPI, Nijmegem, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. (1996). The origins of children's spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.) Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (2001). Learning to talk about motion UP and DOWN in Tzeltal: Is there a language specific bias for verb learning? In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 512–543). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1993). “Uphill” and “downhill” in Tzeltal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3, 46–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, B. (1985). Tense, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, R., Klein, W., & Noyau, C. (1995). The acquisition of temporality in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, R. M., & Liben, L. S. (1997). Piagetian pessimism and the mapping abilities of young children. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87, 168–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, W. J. (1978). Development of the time concept in children. In H. W. Ruse & L. P. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 12 (pp. 267–289). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, W. J. (1982). Conventional time concepts and the children's structuring of time. In W. J. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 171–208). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin S., Case R., & Sandieson, R. (1991). Synchrony and asynchrony in the acquisition of children's everyday mathematical knowledge. In R. Case (Ed.), The mind's staircase (pp. 75–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harner, L. (1982). Talking about the past and the future. In W. J. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 141–170). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits, A. (1998). Schematization. In P. Oliver & K. Gapp (Eds.), Representation and processing of spatial expressions (pp. 149–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. R. (1988). Children's verbal representation of spatial location. In J. Stiles-Davies, M. Kritchevsky, & U. Bellugi (Eds.), Spatial cognition (pp. 195–205) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczaj, S., & Maratsos, M. (1975). On the acquisition of front, back, and side. Child Development, 46, 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–170) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., Moore, M. L., & Golbeck, S. L. (1982). Preschooler's knowledge of their classroom environment: Evidence from small-scale and life-size spatial tasks. Child Development, 53, 1275–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & McGilly, K. (1989). Strategy choices in children's time-telling. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.), Time and human cognition (pp. 185–218). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for language making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2 (pp. 1157–1249). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation (pp. 225–282) New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toivainen, J. (1980). Inflectional affixes used by Finnish-speaking children aged 1-3 years. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weist, R. M. (1986). Tense and aspect. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.) Language acquisition (pp. 356–374). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weist, R. M. (1989). Time concepts in language and thought: filling the Piagetian void from two to five years. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.), Time and human cognition (pp. 63–118). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weist, R. M. (in press a). The first language acquisition of tense and aspect: A review. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Weist, R. M. (in press b). Space and time in first and second language acquisition: A tribute to Henning Wode. In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rhode (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier

  • Weist, R. M. Atanassova, M., Wysocka, H., & Pawlak, A. (1999). Spatial and temporal systems in child language and thought: A cross-linguistic study. First Language, 19, 267–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weist, R. M., & Buczowska, E. (1987). The emergence of temporal adverbs in child Polish, First Language, 7, 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weist, R. M., Lymburner, N. L., Piotrowski, S., & Stoddard, J. L. (2000). Spatial complexity in children's language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 425–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weist, R. M., & Lyytinen, P. (1991). The development of spatial location in Finnish. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weist, R. M., Lyytinen, P., Wysocka, J., & Atanassova, M. (1997). The interaction of language and thought in children's language acquisition: a cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language, 24, 81–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weist, R. M., Wysocka, H., & Lyytinen, P. (1991). Cross-linguistic perspective on the development of temporal systems. Journal of Child Language, 18, 67–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weist, R.M. Temporal and Spatial Concepts in Child Language: Conventional and Configurational. J Psycholinguist Res 31, 195–210 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015522711549

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015522711549

Navigation