Skip to main content

Controllership in der Unternehmenspraxis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Praxishandbuch Controlling

Part of the book series: Springer NachschlageWissen ((SRW))

  • 711 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl die Business Partner Rolle häufig als „Idealtyp“ propagiert wird, zeigt ein Blick in die Praxis, dass der Controllerbereich aufgrund von Erwartungen unterschiedlicher interner KundInnen ein breites Set an Aufgaben erfüllen muss, von denen sich manche eher dem klassischen Bild des Bean Counters zuordnen lassen. ControllerInnen müssen daher bereit sein, in verschiedenen Rollen zu agieren und entsprechende Kompetenzen aufzubauen, die dies ermöglichen. Welche konkrete Ausprägung ihrer Rolle in bestimmten Situationen oder gar generell überwiegt, wird dabei von diversen Faktoren beeinflusst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Abbott, A. 1988. The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens, T., und C. S. Chapman. 2000. Occupational identity of management accountants in Britain and Germany. European Accounting Review 9(4): 477–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, P. 1985. Changing management control strategies: The role of competition between accountancy and other organisational professions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 10(2): 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldvinsdottir, G., J. Burns, H. Nørreklit, und R. W. Scapens. 2009. The image of accountants: From bean counters to extreme accountants. Accounting, Auditing und Accountability Journal 22(6): 858–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., und T. Luckmann. 1967. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougen, P. D. 1994. Joking apart: The serious side to the accountant stereotype. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19(3): 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C. S. 1999. Workplace experiences of information literacy. International Journal of Information Management 19(1): 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J., und G. Baldvinsdottir. 2005. An institutional perspective of accountants' new roles – the interplay of contradictions and praxis. European Accounting Review 14(4): 725–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J., L. Warren, und J. Oliveira. 2014. Business partnering: Is it all that good? Controlling und Management Review 58(2): 36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, S., und B. Pierce. 2007. Towards a more comprehensive understanding of the roles of management accountants. European Accounting Review 16(3): 469–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caglio, A. 2003. Enterprise resource planning systems and accountants: Towards hybridization? European Accounting Review 12(1): 123–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezzamel, M., und J. Burns. 2005. Professional competition, economic value added and management control strategies. Organization Studies 26(5): 755–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. L., und S. R. Lyne. 1997. Activity-based techniques and the death of the beancounter. European Accounting Review 6(1): 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. A. 2008. Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities. In Handbook of organizational institutionalism, Hrsg. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby und K. Sahlin, 413–430. London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goretzki, L., und M. Messner. 2014. Business Partnering in der Praxis etablieren. Controlling & Management Review 58(2): 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goretzki, L., und J. Weber. 2012. Die Zukunft des Business Partners – Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie zur Zukunft des Controllings. Zeitschrift für Controlling & Management 56(1): 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goretzki, L., J. Weber, und S. Zubler. 2010. Die Rollen der Controller. Controller Magazin 35(2): 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goretzki, L., E. Strauss, und J. Weber. 2013. An institutional perspective on the changes in management accountants’ professional role. Management Accounting Research 24(1): 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, T.M. 1980. Role conflicts of management accountants and their position within organisation structures. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5(4): 401–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvenpää, M. 2007. Making business partners: A case study on how management accounting culture was changed. European Accounting Review 16(1): 99–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., und R. Kahn. 1978. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, R. B. 1928. The importance of the controller. Accounting Review 3(3): 237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, C., und S. Sponem. 2012. Roles, authority and involvement of the management accounting function: A multiple case-study perspective. European Accounting Review 21(3): 565–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, V. S., und M. Matejka. 2009. Balancing the dual responsibilities of business unit controllers: Field and survey evidence. The Accounting Review 84(4): 1233–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M., S. Clegg, und M. Kornberger. 2008. Critical practices in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry 17(2): 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, J., und C. Lambert. 2013. Dirty work and the construction of identity. An ethnographic study of management accounting practices. Accounting, Organizations and Society 38(3): 228–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouritsen, J. 1996. Five aspects of accounting departments' work. Management Accounting Research 7(3): 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M. 2014. The elusive business partner controller. Controlling & Management Review 58(2): 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, K. A., G. H. Siegel, und C. S. Kulesza. 1999. Counting more counting less transformations in the management accounting profession. Management Accounting Quarterly 1(1): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathe, V. 1982. Controller involvement in management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scapens, R. W., und M. Jazayeri. 2003. ERP systems and management accounting change: Opportunities or impacts? A research note. European Accounting Review 12(1): 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schäffer, U., J. Weber, und E. Strauß. 2012. Controlling und Effizienz – Auch ein Controller muss sich rechnen! Zeitschrift für Controlling & Management 56(2): 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. 2008. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests. 3. Aufl. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, G. 1999. Counting more, counting less: The new role of management accountants. Strategic Finance 81(5): 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, G., J. Sorensen, und S. Richtermeyer. 2003a. Are you a business partner? Strategic Finance 85(3): 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, G., J. Sorensen, und S. Richtermeyer. 2003b. Becoming a business partner. Strategic Finance 85: 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., H. Guetzkow, G. Kozmetzky, und G. Tyndall. 1954. Centralization vs. De-centralization in organizing the controller's department. Houston: Scholars Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhübel, V. 2014. Kompetenz als Erfolgsgarant. Controlling & Management Review 58(2): 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, E., und S. Spittler. 2012. Controlling und IT: Wie Trends und Herausforderungen der IT die Controllingfunktion verändern. Zeitschrift für Controlling & Management 56(2): 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaivio, J. 1999. Examining „the quantified customer“. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24(8): 689–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaivio, J. 2004. Mobilizing local knowledge with provocative non-financial measures. European Accounting Review 13(1): 39–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verstegen, B. H. J., I. De Loo, P. Mol, K. Slagter, und H. Geerkens. 2007. Classifying controllers by activities: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research 5(2): 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. 2008. Fähigkeitsprofil von Controllern – Kann die Empirie die Notwendigkeit einer verhaltensorientierten Perspektive des Controllings stützen? Zeitschrift für Controlling & Management 52(1): 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. 2011. The development of controller tasks: Explaining the nature of controllership and its changes. Journal of Management Control 22(1): 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J., U. Schäffer, L. Goretzki und E. Strauß. 2012. Die zehn Zukunftsthemen des Controllings, Schriftenreihe Advanced Controlling, Bd. 82. Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R., und R. Whipp. 1992. Professional ideology and marketing implementation. European Journal of Marketing 26(1): 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukas Goretzki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this entry

Cite this entry

Goretzki, L. (2014). Controllership in der Unternehmenspraxis. In: Becker, W., Ulrich, P. (eds) Praxishandbuch Controlling. Springer NachschlageWissen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04795-5_8-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04795-5_8-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-04795-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Wirtschaftswissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics