Skip to main content
Log in

Hostility, Anger, and Marital Adjustment: Concurrent and Prospective Associations with Psychosocial Vulnerability

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Hostility may contribute to risk for disease through psychosocial vulnerability, including the erosion of the quality of close relationships. This study examined hostility, anger, concurrent ratings of the relationship, and change in marital adjustment over 18 months in 122 married couples. Wives’ and husbands’ hostility and anger were related to concurrent ratings of marital adjustment and conflict. In prospective analyses, wives’ but not husbands’ hostility and anger were related to change in marital adjustment. In hierarchical regression and SEM models wives’ anger was a unique predictor of both wives’ and husbands’ change in marital adjustment. The association between wives’ anger and change in husbands’ marital satisfaction was mediated by husbands’ ratings of conflict in the marriage. These results support the role of hostility and anger in the development of psychosocial vulnerability, but also suggest an asymmetry in the effects of wives’ and husbands’ trait anger and hostility on marital adjustment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baucom, D. H., Shoham, V., Mueser, K. T., et al. (1998). Empirically supported couple and family interventions for marital distress and adult mental health problems. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 66(1): 53–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barefoot, J. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., et al. (1989). The Cook-Medley Hostility scale: Item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosom. Med. 51(1): 46–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35(6): 1173–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indicies in structural models. Psych. Bull. 107(2): 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A., and Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 136–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., Cooper, H. M., and Lemke, K. M. (1991). Meta-analysis of factor analyses: An illustration using the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory. Pers. Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(3): 344–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., and Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. J. Consult. Psychol. 21: 343–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., and Perry, M. (1982). The aggression questionnaire. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63: 452–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, W. W., and Medley, D. M. (1954). Proposed hostility and pharisaic virtue scales for the MMPI. J. App. Psychol. 38: 414–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, D. R., Allgood, S. M., and Larson, J. H. (1990). Assessing marital quality with distressed and nondistressed couples: A comparison and equivalency table for three frequently used measures. J. Marriage Fam. 52(1): 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeston, M. H., and Pléchaty, M. (1997). Reconsiderations of the locke-wallace marital adjustment test: Is it still relevant for the 1990s? Psych. Rep. 81(2): 419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, L. C., and Smith, T. W. (1998). Construct validation of health-relevant personality traits: Interpersonal circumplex and five-factor model analyses of the Aggression Questionnaire. Intern. J. Beh. Med. 5: 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., et al. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. J. Marriage Fam. 60(1): 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. A. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the aggression questionnaire. Beh. Res. Ther. 33(8): 991–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. E. (1999). Cynical hostility and deficiencies in functional support: The moderating role of gender in psychosocial vulnerability to disease. Pers. Ind. Diff. 27: 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, B. K., and Kelly, K. E. (1989). Hostility in employed women: Relation to work and marital experiences, social support, stress, and anger expression. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 15(2): 175–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 76–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., and Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychol. Bull. 127: 472–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Predictive validation of a telephone version of the Locke-Wallace Marital Adjustment Test. J. Marriage Fam. 51(3): 767–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H. J., and Wallace, E. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage Fam. Living 21: 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Warsi, G., and Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate. Behav. Res. 30(1): 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. Q., Marksides, K. S., Chiriboga, D. A., et al. (1995). A test of the psychosocial vulnerability and health behavior models of hostility: Results from an 11-year follow-up study of Mexican Americans. Psychosom. Med. 57: 572–581.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. Q., Smith, T. W., Turner, C. W., et al. (1995). A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychol. Bull. 119: 322–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musante, L., MacDougall, J. M., Dembroski, T. M., et al. (1989). Potential hostility and dimensions of anger. Health Psychol. 8(3): 343–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., and Muthén, B. O. (2001). Mplus user’s guide. (2nd edn.). Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Newton, T. L., and Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1995). Hostility and erosion of marital quality during early marriage. J. Behav. Med. 18: 601–619.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, J. N., and Emery, C. F. (2002). Psychosocial vulnerability, hostility, and family history of coronary heart disease among male and female college students. Int. J. Beh. Med. 9: 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, G. R., Saronson, I. G., and Saronson, B. R. (1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one? J. Per. Soc. Psychol. 61(6): 1028–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, G. R., Sarason, I. G., and Sarason, B. R. (1997). Assessing the quality of personal relationships. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 14(3): 339–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, J. M., Smith, T. W., and Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Distinguishing narcissism and hostility: Similarities and differences in interpersonal circumplex and five-factor correlates. J. Pers. Ass. 76(3): 537–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. J., and Krokoff, J. L. (1990). A time-series analysis of withdrawal, hostility, and displeasure in satisfied and dissatisfied marriages. J. Mar. Fam. 52(1): 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., and Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. ASA Proceedings of the Business and Economic Section, pp. 308–313.

  • Schafer, J. L., and Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychol. Meth. 7(2): 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (1992). Hostility and Health: Current status of a psychosomatic hypothesis. Health Psychol. 11: 139–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W. (1994). Concepts and methods in the study of anger, hostility, and health. In Siegman, A. W., and Smith, T. W. (Eds.), Anger, hostility and the heart. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., and Gallo, L. C. (1999). Hostility and cardiovascular reactivity during marital interaction. Psychosom. Med. 61: 436–445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Glazer, K., Ruiz, J. M., and Gallo, L. C. (2004). Hostility, anger, aggressiveness and coronary heart disease: An interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. J. Pers. 72: 1217–1270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., Nealey-Moore, J., Uchino, B., et al. (2003). Hostility, anger, and cardiovascular reactivity during marital interaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychosomatic Society, Phoenix, AZ March 5–8, 2003.

  • Smith, T. W., Pope, M. K., Sanders, J. D., et al. (1988). Cynical hostility at home and work: Psychosocial vulnerability across domains. J. Res. Pers. 22: 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. W., and Ruiz, J. M. (2002). Psychosocial influences on the development and course of coronary heart disease: Current status and implications for research and practice. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 70(3): 548–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uchino, B. N. (2004). Social support and physical health outcomes; Understanding the health consequences of our relationships. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchino, B. N., Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. W., and Bloor, L. (2004). Heterogeneity in social networks: A comparison of different models linking relationships to psychological outcomes. J. Soc. Clin. Psych. 23: 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy W. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baron, K.G., Smith, T.W., Butner, J. et al. Hostility, Anger, and Marital Adjustment: Concurrent and Prospective Associations with Psychosocial Vulnerability. J Behav Med 30, 1–10 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-006-9086-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-006-9086-z

KEY WORDS

Navigation