Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Lysenkoism Became Pseudoscience: Dobzhansky to Velikovsky

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At some point in America in the 1940s, T. D. Lysenko’s neo-Lamarckian hereditary theories transformed from a set of disputed doctrines into a prime exemplar of “pseudoscience.” This paper explores the context in which this theory acquired this pejorative status by examining American efforts to refute Lysenkoism both before and after the famous August 1948 endorsement of Lysenko’s doctrines by the Stalinist state, with particular attention to the translation efforts of Theodosius Dobzhansky. After enumerating numerous tactics for combating perceived pseudoscience, the Lysenko case is then juxtaposed with another American case of alleged pseudoscience: the notorious 1950 scandal surrounding Immanuel Velikovsky’s Worlds in Collision (1950, Worlds in Collision. New York: Macmillan). On several levels, the characterization of Lysenkoism as pseudoscientific served as a template for casting other rejected theories, including Velikovsky’s, in the same light.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleksandrov, V. Ia. 1992. Trudnye gody sovetskoi biologii: Zapiski sovremennika. St. Petersburg: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Henry H. 1984. Beyond Velikovsky: The History of a Public Controversy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condon, Edward U. 1950. “Velikovsky’s Catastrophe.” New Republic 122(17) (24 April): 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degen, Ion. 1997. Immanuil Velikovskii: Rasskaz o zamechatel’nom cheloveke. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grazia, Alfred, et al. 1966. The Velikovsky Affair: The Warfare of Science and Scientism. New Hyde Park, NY: University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1946. “Lysenko’s ‘Genetics’.” Journal of Heredity 37: 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1949a. “Marxist Biology, French Style.” Journal of Heredity 40: 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1949b. “The Suppression of a Science.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5(May): 144–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1952a. “Lysenko’s ‘Michurinist’ Genetics.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 8(February): 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1952b. “Two Recent Versions of Eugenics.” American Naturalist 86(January–February): 61–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1953. “Lysenko Progresses Backward.” Journal of Heredity 44: 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1955. “The Crisis of Soviet Biology.” Ernest J Simmons (ed.), Continuity and Change in Russian and Soviet Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1956. The Biological Basis of Human Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1958. “Lysenko at Bay.” Journal of Heredity 49: 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1962–1965. Reminiscences. Oral History Research Office, Butler Library, Columbia University, New York City, New York.

  • Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1964. Heredity and the Nature of Man. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L.C. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Science 103(8): 180–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L.C. and Dobzhansky, Th. 1946. Heredity Race, and Society. New York: Penguin Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L.C. and Dobzhansky, Th. 1952. Heredity, Race and Society, rev. ed. New York: Mentor.

  • Ellenberger, Leroy. 1979. “A Point of View: The Cold War, McCarthy and Velikovsky.” S.I.S. Workshop 1(5): 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaisinovich, A.E. 1988. Zarozhdenie i razvitie genetiki. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Martin. 1950. “The Hermit Scientist.” Antioch Review 10(4): 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geison, Gerald L. 1995. The Private Science of Louis Pasteur. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, Bentley. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Quarterly Review of Biology 21: 279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard B. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Physiological Zoology 19: 332–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Richard B. 1949. “Research and Politics.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5(May): 150–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Theodore J. 1966. Ideas in Conflict. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormley, Melinda. 2006. Geneticist L. C. Dunn: Politics, Activism, and Community. Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon State University.

  • Graham, Loren R. 1987. Science, Philosophy, and Human Behavior in the Soviet Union. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S. 1950. “St. Quetzalcoatl and St. Fenris.” New Statesman and Nation 1(11 November): 432–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Oren Solomon. 2003. “C. D. Darlington and the British and American Reaction to Lysenko and the Soviet Conception of Science.” Journal of the History of Biology 35: 309–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herget, Paul. 1950. “It is Just as Barnum Said.” Cincinnati Enquirer (1 April): 7.

  • Hudson, P.S. and Richens, R.H. 1946. The New Genetics in the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Imperial Bureau of Plant Breeding and Genetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joravsky, David. 1970. The Lysenko Affair. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaftanov, S. 1949. “In Support of Michurin’s Biological Theory in Higher Institutions of Learning.” Science 109(28 January): 90–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolchinskii, E.I. 2007. Biologiia Germanii i Rossii-SSSR v usloviiakh sotsial’no-politi- cheskikh krizisov pervoi poloviny XX veka (mezhdu liberalizmom, kommunizmom i natsional-sotsializmom). St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krementsov, Nikolai. 1996. “A “Second Front” in Soviet Genetics: The International Dimension of the Lysenko Controversy.” Journal of the History of Biology 29: 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krementsov, Nikolai. 1997. Stalinist Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laptev, I. 1947. “Antipatrioticheskie postupki pod flagom ‘nauchnoi’ kritiki.” Pravda 230(10621): 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, Eric. 1950. “The Day the Sun Stood Still.” Harper’s Magazine (January): 19–26.

  • Lash, Joseph P. 1949. “Russian Science and Heresy.” New Republic (3 January): 11–13.

  • Laudan, Larry. 2009 [1983]. “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem.” Robert T. Pennock and Michael Ruse (eds.), But Is It Science?: The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy, updated edition. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, pp. 312–330.

  • Lysenko, T.D. 1946. Heredity and Its Variability, trans. Theodosius Dobzhansky. New York: King’s Crown Press.

  • Lysenko, T.D. 1951a. Heredity and Its Variability. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysenko, T.D. 1951b. New Developments in the Science of Biological Species. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAulay, Robert E. 1975. Substantive and Ideological Aspects of Science: An Analysis of the Velikovsky Controversy. M.A. Thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

  • Medvedev, Zhores A. 1987. Soviet Agriculture. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, Zhores A. 1969. The Rise and Fall of T. D. Lysenko, trans. I. Michael Lerner. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Paul, Diane B. 1983. “A War on Two Fronts: J.B.S. Haldane and the Response to Lysenkoism in Britain.” Journal of the History of Biology 16: 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia. 1950a. “Worlds in Collision.” Popular Astronomy 58(6): 278–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia. 1950b. “Nonsense, Dr. Velikovsky!” The Reporter 2(6): 37–40.

  • Pigliucci, Massimo. 2010. Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 1967. “The Growth of Science in Society.” Minerva 5: 533–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1985a. “A New Perspective on Lysenko?” Annals of Science 42: 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1985b. “Genetics Under Stalin.” Science 227: 1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1989. “The Practice Criterion and the Rise of Lysenkoism.” Science Studies 1: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, Karl. 1944. “Soviet Biology.” Science 99: 298–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrecker, Ellen. 1998. Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon, Ruth Velikovsky. 1995. Aba: The Glory and the Torment: The Life of Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky. Dubuque, IA: Times Mirror Higher Education Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, Robert. 1946. Science, Totalitarian Model. Saturday Review of Literature (9 March): 28–32.

  • Soyfer, Valery. 1994. Lysenko and the Tragedy of Soviet Science, trans. Leo Gruliow and Rebecca Gruliow. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

  • Stern, Curt. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” American Naturalist 80: 241–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1950. Worlds in Collision. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1951. “Answer to My Critics.” Harper’s Magazine 202 (June): 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1955. Earth in Upheaval. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1982. Mankind in Amnesia. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, Duane Leroy. 1990. The “Jewish Science” of Immanuel Velikovsky: Culture and Biography as Ideational Determinants. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bowling Green State University.

  • Wang, Jessica. 1999. American Science in an Age of Anxiety: Scientists, Anticommunism, and the Cold War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhebrak, Anton. 1945. “Soviet Biology.” Science 102(5 October): 357–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zirkle, Conway. 1947. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Isis 37: 108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zirkle, Conway. 1949. Death of a Science in Russia: The Fate of Genetics as Described in Pravda and Elsewhere. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirkle, Conway. 1959. Evolution, Marxian Biology, and the Social Scene. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of History, Princeton University, 136 Dickinson Hall, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA

    Michael D. Gordin

Authors
  1. Michael D. Gordin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Gordin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordin, M.D. How Lysenkoism Became Pseudoscience: Dobzhansky to Velikovsky. J Hist Biol 45, 443–468 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9287-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9287-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation