Skip to main content
Log in

Defence force activities in marine protected areas: environmental management of Shoalwater Bay Training Area, Queensland, Australia

  • Physics
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental management of military activities is of growing global concern by defence forces. As one of the largest landholders in Australia, the Australian Defence Force (ADF) is increasingly concerned with sustainable environmental management. This paper focuses on how the ADF is maintaining effective environmental management, especially in environmentally sensitive marine protected areas. It uses Shoalwater Bay Training Area (SWBTA) as a research example to examine environmental management strategies conducted by the ADF. SWBTA is one of the most significant Defence training areas in Australia, with a large number of single, joint and combined military exercises conducted in the area. With its maritime component contained in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park (GBRMP), the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (GBRWHA), and abutting Queensland’s State Marine Parks, it has high protection values. It is therefore vital for the ADF to adopt environmentally responsible management while they are conducting military activities. As to various tools employed to manage environmental performance, the ISO 14001 Environmental Management System (EMS) is widely used by the ADF. This paper examines military activities and marine environmental management within SWBTA, using the Talisman Saber (TS) exercise series as an example. These are extensive joint exercises conducted by the ADF and the United States defence forces. The paper outlines relevant legislative framework and environmental policies, analyses how the EMS operates in environmental management of military activities, and how military activities comply with these regulations. It discusses the implementation of the ADF EMS, including risk reduction measures, environmental awareness training, consultation and communication with stakeholders. A number of environmental management actions used in the TS exercises are presented to demonstrate the EMS application. Our investigations to this point indicate that the ADF is complying with all relevant legislation and policies. Further research is required to confirm compliance and conclude that military activities have good accord with environmental management objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson B, Bryce M, Theobald J et al. 2007. Habitat management for tanks and Tuans: Evolving approaches at Puckapunyal Military Area. Ecological Management & Restoration, 8(1):11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Heritage Database. 2009. Shoalwater Bay Military Training Area, Byfield Rd, Byfield, QLD, Australia. Australian Heritage Database. p. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeby R. 2008. Defence wants free rein on training. Canberra Times, 10/10/2008. Available from: Factiva. p. 1.

  • Bioce L P. 2007. Defense and conservation: Compatible missions. Endangered Species Update, 24(1): 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozek F, Komar A, Dvorak J. 2004. Method for the military facilities risk assessment. Defense and the Environment: Effective Scientific Communication. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands. p. 167–176.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collie T, Sensese C. 2004. Supplementary environment report Talisman Saber 05 EPBC Act referral, prepared for Australian Defence Force. Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd, Townsville. p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collie T, Sensese C. 2005. Department of Defence Exercise Talisman Saber 05 Environment Risk Assessment, prepared for Department of Defence. Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd, Melbourne. p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins T, Trinder C, Moffitt R. 2007. Exercise Talisman Saber 2007 Environment Post Exercise Report (PXR). p. 32.

  • Cosgrove B. 1996. Shoalwater Bay: Settlers in a Queensland Wilderness. Central Queensland University Press, Rockhampton, Queensland. p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddy S M, Laut P, Davis J R et al. 1990. Modelling the environmental effects of training on a major Australian army base. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, (32): 83–88.

  • Dawson M. 2004. Environmental Management Systems (EMS) in the military sector-promoting broader implementation. In: Mahutova K, Barich III J J, Kreizenbeck R A eds. Defense and the Environment: Effective Scientific Communication. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. p. 75–83.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defence. 2003. Defence Public Environment Report. Canberra. p. 33.

  • Department of Defence. 2005a. Public Submission: Review of management arrangements for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. p. 12.

  • Department of Defence. 2005b. ADF Maritime Activities Environmental Management Plan.

  • Department of Defence. 2007a. Defence Environmental Policy. Department of Defence, Defence Support Group. p. 2.

  • Department of Defence, 2007b. Exercise Talisman Saber.

  • Department of Defence. http://www.defence.gov.au/exercises/ts07/default.htm (accessible on 2010-04-16)

  • Department of Defence. n.d.-a. Environmental Management Systems (EMS). Department of Defence, Defence Support Group. http://www.defence.gov.au/environment/ems.htm (accessible on 2010-04-16).

  • Department of Defence. n.d.-b. Defence Environmental Strategic Plan 2006–2009. Department of Defence, Canberra. p. 28.

  • Department of Defence. n.d.-c. TS07 EXPLAN, Damage control, environment and heritage plan. p. 34.

  • Department of Defence. n.d.-d. Talisman Sabre Home. Department of Defence. http://www.defence.gov.au/talisman_sabre (accessible on 2010-04-16)

  • Department of Defence, Defence Support Group. n.d. Environmental Impact Assessment in Defence. Department of Defense, 2000. ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems Pilot Study Final Report April 2000. p. 23. http://www.defence.gov.au/environment/impact.htm (accessible on 2010-04-16)

  • Department of the Environment Water Heritage and the Arts, 2008. Model Environmental Management System for Australian Government agencies, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Environment Australia, 2000. A Framework for Public Environmental Reporting-An Australian Approach. Environment Australia, Canberra. p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendl H, Senese C, 2007a. TS07 public environment report, prepared for Department of Defence. Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd, Melbourne. p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendl H, Senese C, 2007b. Talisman Saber 2007 Environmental Management Plan, prepared for Department of Defence. Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd, Melbourne. p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. 2004. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Zoning Plan 2003. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. p. 220.

  • Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority. n.d. Environmental management of Defence activities. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.

  • Latham R E, Zercher D, McElhenny P. 2005. The role of disturbance in habitat restoration and management for the eastern regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia idalia) at a military installation in Pennsylvania. Ecological Restoration, 25(2): 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment. n.d. Environmental Management of Military Facilities. Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea.

  • Moore R T. 2004. A corporate EMS for the UK Ministry of Defence. In: Mahutova K, Barich III J J, Kreizenbeck R A eds. Defense and the Environment: Effective Scientific Communication. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. p. 85–89.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • NATO-CCMS, 2000. NATO-CCMS Pilot Study on Environmental Management Systems in the Military Sector, final report. p. 115. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency. n.d. Operational policy — Military exercises in QPWS managed areas. Environmental Protection Agency. p. 6.

  • Ramos T B, de Melo J J. 2005. Environmental management practices in the defence sector: Assessment of the Portuguese military’s environmental profile. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(12): 1117–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos T B, de Melo J J. 2006. Developing and implementing an Environmental Performance Index for the Portuguese Military. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15:71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos T B, Alves I, Subtil R. 2007. Environmental pressures and impacts of public sector organizations: the case of the Portuguese military. Progress in Industrial Ecology-An International Journal, 4(5): 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao N H. 2005. Environmental management: Relevance and implications for management of defence installations for sustainability. Current Science, 88(11): 1753–1758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouphael T, Polglaze J, LeProvost I, 2006. Strategic environmental assessment of defence activities in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, prepared for Directorate of Environmental Stewardship, Department of Defence. URS Australia Pty Ltd, Perth. p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Australian Navy. n.d. Navy and the Environment. http://www.navy.gov.au/Environment (accessible on 2010-04-16)

  • Scott B, McMaster J, Baker N. 2000. Environmental Brief Shoalwater Bay Training Area January to December. Australian Oceanographic Data Centre, Potts Point. p. 39.

  • Scully D L. 1997. The tidal hydrodynamics of Shoalwater Bay: a numerical simulation of a macrotidal environment. Bachelor of Science (Hons), University of New South Wales at the Australian Defence Force Academy. p. 176.

  • Sharp R. 1998. Shoalwater Bay and the future of the environmental assessment inquiry process. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 15(3):221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist V. 2008. Talisman Saber 2009 Draft Public Environment Report. p. 105.

  • Sinclair Knight Merz (SKM). 2009. Talisman Saber 2009 Public environment report. Sinclair Knight Merz. p. 149.

  • Spurway R F. 1982. The Impact of the Environment on Armoured Vehicles at Shoalwater Bay, Queensland. Bachelor of Science (Hons), University of New South Wales, Royal Military College. p. 443.

  • The Directorate of Environment Impact Management. 2007. Consideration of Environmental Impacts Arising from the Conduct of a Major Military Exercise. Environmental Assessment Report, Talisman Saber 2007, p. 66.

  • The Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing, Attorney-General’s Department. 2007. Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. p. 578.

  • The Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing, Attorney-General’s Department. 2008. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975. p. 227.

  • Trinder C. 2007. Environmental Impact Assessment of Major Military Exercises in the GBR World Heritage Area. Department of Defence. p. 18.

  • Trinder C, Cole S. n. d. Military activities and high seas biodiversity conservation. p. 15.

  • Tunstall B. 1996. Integration of military training and conservation in the Shoalwater Bay Training Area. In: Crabb P, Kesby J, Olive L ed. Environmentally Responsible Defence. Australian Defence Studies Centre, Canberra. p. 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wark N J, Verrier F J. 2002. Australian Defence Organisation Environmental Management Initiatives-Shoalwater Bay Training Area. Federal Facilities Environmental Journal (Spring) p. 53–63.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen Wu  (武文).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, W., Wang, X., Paull, D. et al. Defence force activities in marine protected areas: environmental management of Shoalwater Bay Training Area, Queensland, Australia. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 28, 667–676 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-010-9113-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-010-9113-3

Keyword

Navigation