Skip to main content

The Analysis of Money and Credit During the Financial Crisis: The Approach At the Bank of England

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Monetary Analysis at Central Banks
  • 870 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the empirical analysis of money and credit undertaken at the Bank of England during the financial crisis and how it is used. An aggregate structural vector autoregression sVAR including money is employed to analyse the impact of quantitative easing (QE), as a crosscheck on other approaches focussing on the impact on financial market prices. Sectoral models of money and credit are used to assess the impact of the crisis and the associated shock to credit conditions. The contraction in the supply of credit to each sector can explain a substantial proportion of the shortfall in GDP relative to its pre-crisis trend. The shocks can also explain a large part of the fall in credit and much of the contraction in the customer funding gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Thomas (1997a, 1997b), Brigden and Mizen (2004), Dhar et al. (2000), De Santis, Favero, and Roffia (2008), Papademos and Stark (2010).

  2. 2.

    See, for example, Kaldor and Trevithick (1981).

  3. 3.

    Defined as M4 excluding the holding of intermediate OFCs deflated by the GDP deflator.

  4. 4.

    The coefficient on output is above unity, suggesting the VAR is missing some determinants of underlying broad money velocity. Work on sectoral money demand suggests that broader measures of wealth (over and above that captured by share prices) are relevant for the long-run demand for money, see Thomas (1997a, 1997b).

  5. 5.

    Bank Rate in the case of variable rate loans and swap rates for fixed rate mortgages.

  6. 6.

    However, this may illustrate data limitations. Because of the lack of mix-adjusted loan rates, our measure of corporate spreads is partly constructed by using bond yields. See Butt and Pugh (2014) for more detail.

  7. 7.

    Broad money here consists of notes and coin held by the UK non-bank private sector, plus sight and time deposits, sale and repurchase agreements, and bank-issued securities of up to and including five years’ original maturity.

  8. 8.

    These elements comprise lending to NIOFCs, the lending and deposits of IOFCs, foreign currency lending and deposits, and overseas residents’ sterling borrowing and deposits.

  9. 9.

    Another way of putting this is that, because spreads rose despite a probable fall in credit demand, we can be fairly sure that credit supply contracted. Barnett and Thomas (2013) use sign restrictions on the response of spreads to help identify credit supply shocks.

  10. 10.

    Note, this is a particular definition of the CFG; broader definitions are often used to monitor financial stability risks.

  11. 11.

    Unlike financial assets, which are ultimately claims on other sectors, increases in house prices do not really represent increases in the wealth of the household sector—they simply cause transfers of wealth between current owners and future first-time buyers. Econometric work with micro-data finds support for liquidity effects but not wealth effects, suggesting that the strong correlation between house prices and private consumption is driven mainly by common factors—see Attanasio, Blow, Hamilton, and Leicester (2005) and Disney, Gathergood, and Henley (2010).

  12. 12.

    Based on the measures we model, the stock of credit to the real economy grew by around 70 % between end-2002 and end-2007. The ratio of credit to GDP increased from around 88 % to around 124 %. Other factors contributing to the strong trend in lending aggregates may have been the low level of global interest rates, changes in credit conditions that are not picked up by the spread data which we have used, or the long period of stable growth reducing perceptions of risk—see McLeay and Thomas (2015).

  13. 13.

    The range depends on how the ‘pre-crisis trend’ is defined—either by fitting a log linear trend to the data from 1997 to 2007, or by projecting the average growth rate over this period forward from 2007Q3 onwards. Of course, to the extent that there were influences in the pre-crisis period that had a secular effect on credit growth and which are not captured in our spread variables, this will not necessarily be the most appropriate counterfactual.

  14. 14.

    In further work, we plan to model the Commercial Real Estate (CRE) sector more explicitly; a large part of the stock of lending to PNFCs is associated with CRE.

References

  • Andrés, J., López-Salido, D. J., & Nelson, E. (2004). Tobin’s imperfect substitution in optimising general equilibrium. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36(5), 665–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio, O., Blow, L., Hamilton, R., & Leicester, A. (2005). Consumption, house prices and expectations. Booms and busts: Consumption, house prices and expectations. Economica, 71, 20–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, A., & Thomas, R. (2013). Has weak lending and activity in the United Kingdom been driven by credit supply shocks? Bank of England Working Papers 482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, C., & Benati, L. (2010). Unconventional monetary policy and the great recession—Estimating the impact of a compression in the yield spread at the zero lower bound. European Central Bank Working Paper Series No. 1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., & Blinder, A. (1988). Credit, money, and aggregate demand. American Economic Review, 78(2), 435–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1999). The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework. In J. B. Taylor & M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of macroeconomics (1st ed., Vol. 1, p. 1341). Berlin, Germany: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, J., Rossiter, N., & Thomas, R. (2011). Understanding the recent weakness in broad money growth. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 51(1), 22–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, J., & Thomas, R. (2012). The impact of QE on the UK economy—Some supportive monetarist arithmetic. Bank of England Working Paper No 431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigden, A., & Mizen, P. (2004). Money, credit and investment in the UK industrial and commercial companies sector. The Manchester School, 72(1), 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, K., & Meltzer, A. H. (1972). Money, debt, and economic activity. Journal of Political Economy, 80, 951–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butt, N., & Pugh, A. (2014). Credit spreads: Capturing credit conditions facing households and firms. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 54(2), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Cúrdia, V., & Ferrero, A. (2012). The macroeconomic effects of large‐scale asset purchase programmes. The Economic Journal, 122(564), F289–F315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrystal, K. A., & Mizen, P. (2005a). Other financial corporations: Cinderella or ugly sister of empirical monetary economics? International Journal of Finance & Economics, 10(1), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrystal, K. A., & Mizen, P. (2005b). A dynamic model of money, credit, and consumption: A joint model for the UK household sector. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 37(1), 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloyne, J., Thomas, R., Tuckett, A., & Wills, S. (2015). A sectoral framework for analysing money, credit and unconventional monetary policy. Bank of England Staff Working Papers, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobham, D., & Kang, Y. (2012). Financial crisis and quantitative easing: Can broad money tell us anything? The Manchester School, 80(s1), 54–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congdon, T., & Ward, S. (1993). The personal sector’s demand for M4 balances. Lombard Street Research Econometrics Research Note.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curdia, V., & Woodford, M. (2011). The central-bank balance sheet as an instrument of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(1), 54–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Santis, R., Favero, C., & Roffia, B. (2008). Euro area money demand and international portfolio allocation. ECB Working Paper Series No. 926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, S., Pain, D., & Thomas, R. (2000). A small structural empirical model of the UK monetary transmission mechanism. Bank of England Working Paper No. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disney, R., Gathergood, J., & Henley, A. (2010). House price shocks, negative equity and household consumption in the United Kingdom. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(6), 1179–1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (2007). The Bank of England credit conditions survey. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 47(3), 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, G., & Woodford, M. (2003). The zero bound on interest rates and optimal monetary policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 34(1), 235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. G., & Vega, J. L. (1993). An empirical analysis of M4 in the United Kingdom. Bank of England Working Paper No. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M., & Karadi, P. (2011). A model of unconventional monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(1), 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (2012). Asset purchase policy at the effective lower bound for interest rates. Bank of England Working Paper No. 444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1992). Cointegration in partial systems and the efficiency of single equation analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 52, 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, M., Lasaosa, A., Stevens, I., & Tong, M. (2011). The financial market impact of quantitative easing in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Central Banking, 7(3), 113–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, M., Tong, M., & Woods, R. (2011). The United Kingdom’s quantitative easing policy: design, operation and impact. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 51(3), 200–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N., & Trevithick, J. (1981). A Keynesian perspective on money. Lloyds Bank Review, 12, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapetanios, G., Mumtaz, H., Stevens, I., & Theodoridis, K. (2012). Assessing the economy-wide effects of quantitative easing. Bank of England Working Paper No. 443.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. G., Plosser, C. I., Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1991). ‘Stochastic trends and economic fluctuations’, American Economic Review, 81, 819--40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidler, D. (1984). The buffer stock notion in monetary economics. The Economic Journal, 94, 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeay, M., & Thomas, R. (2015). UK broad money growth in the long expansion 1992–2007: What can it tell us about the role of money? In J. Chadha, A. Chrystal, J. Pearlman, P. Smith, & S. Wright (Eds.), The long expansion in the UK: Causes and consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellander, E., Vredin, A., & Warne, A. (1992). Stochastic trends and economic fluctuations in a small open economy. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7(4), 369–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papademos, L. D., & Stark, J. (Eds.). (2010). Enhancing monetary analysis. Frankfurt, Germany: European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2002). Long-run structural modelling. Econometric Reviews, 23, 183–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. (1997a). The demand for M4: A sectoral analysis, Part 1—The personal sector. Bank of England Working Paper No. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. (1997b). The demand for M4: A sectoral analysis, Part 2—The corporate sector. Bank of England Working Paper No. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbain, J. (1995). Partial versus full system modelling of cointegrated systems. Journal of Econometrics, 69(1), 117–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa, S., & Yang, J. (2011). Financial intermediaries in an estimated DSGE model for the United Kingdom. Bank of England Working Paper No. 431.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bridges, J., Cloyne, J., Thomas, R., Tuckett, A. (2016). The Analysis of Money and Credit During the Financial Crisis: The Approach At the Bank of England. In: Cobham, D. (eds) Monetary Analysis at Central Banks. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59335-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59335-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59334-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59335-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics