Skip to main content

How Do Top Construction Companies Diversify in the International Construction Market?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Abstract

Globalization has created an international market that allows construction companies transcend traditional national boundaries and conduct business overseas. With new opportunities being brought to contractors, competition also grows exponentially in this market. Diversification is frequently adopted by these contractors as a strategy by the contractors for either growth, or risk management, or both in this competitive environment. However, the pattern of diversification has not been well measured, mapped, and analyzed. The aim of this research is to develop a Diversify Index (DI) and examine international contractors’ diversification pattern. The data is from the Top 225 International Contractors’ reports ranked by ENR (Engineering News-Record) from 1995 to 2014. Distributions of the DI were explored first and then case studies were used to investigate the specific diversification strategies adopted by the top international contractors. It is discovered that a downward trend of DI with subsequent changes in rankings expresses that larger contractors increasingly adopt various diversification strategies in international competition. The results provide valuable sights on the relationship between the competitive success and their diversification strategies as well as the tendency of diversification strategies adopted by top international contractors in different regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lu W (2014) Reliability of engineering news-record international construction data. Constru Manage Econ 1–15. doi:10.1080/01446193.2014.919403

  2. Reina P, Tulacz GJ (2013) The top 250 international contractors. Eng News Rec 271(8):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ansoff HI (1957) Strategies for diversification. Harvard Bus Rev 35(5):113–124

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arasti MR, Khaleghi M, Noori J (2010) The linkage of technology strategy and overall strategy of multi business diversified groups: literature review and theoritical framework (pp 1–12)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jewell C, Flanagan R, Lu WS (2014) The dilemma of scope and scale for construction professional service firms. Constru Managem Econ 32(5):473–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prahalad C, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus Rev 68(5):79–91

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gary MS (2005) Implementation strategy and performance outcomes in related diversification. Strateg Manage J 26(7):643–664. doi:10.1002/smj.468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mackey TB (2006) Essays on corporate diversification and firm value. Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chandler AD (1969) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise: Massachusetts Institute of Technologie

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berger PG, Ofek E (1995) Diversifications effect on firm value. J Financ Econ 37(1):39–65. doi:10.1016/0304-405x(94)00798-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chang Y, Thomas H (1989) The impact of diversification strategy on risk-return performance. Strateg Manage J 10(3):271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kurien SA (2004) Business development strategies used by general contracting construction companies in Texas for market diversification. M.S. thesis, Department of Construction Science, Texas A & M University, College Station, Tex

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reed R, Luffman GA (1986) Diversification: The growing confusion. Strateg Manage J 7(1):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(3)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Choi J, Russell JS (2005) Long-term entropy and profitability change of united states public construction firms. J Manage Eng 21(1):17–26. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005) 21:1(17)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacquemin AP, Berry CH (1979) Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. J Ind Econ 27(4):359–369. doi:10.2307/2097958

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) General Research Fund (GRF) (Project No.: HKU 749312B).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meng Ye .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ye, M., Lu, W., Ye, K., Flanagan, R. (2017). How Do Top Construction Companies Diversify in the International Construction Market?. In: Wu, Y., Zheng, S., Luo, J., Wang, W., Mo, Z., Shan, L. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0855-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0855-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0854-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0855-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics