Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Urban Land Development Boundary Oriented by the New Type Urbanization Policy: A Case of Yiwu City

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

  • 2876 Accesses

Abstract

The paper summarizes the traditional method to delimit the urban land development boundary which aims to make a good balance of urban sprawl and ecology protection in a “industrial” model, while under the new type urbanization policy, a “urbanization” mode seems to be more appropriate with China’s development. In the paper, on the basis of traditional methods to delimit urban land development boundary under the background of the new urbanization policy, we try to explore a delimitation method which is more closer to the “urbanization” mode. We take the downtown of Yiwu for an example and obtain results of the urban land development boundary of Yiwu in the year of 2020 in both of the two modes, one of them is in the “industrial” model and guided with the “sector theory”, and the other is in the “urbanization” mode and guided with the “multiple nuclei theory”, and then we compare the thoughts and the results. The paper chooses the second method, namely the method which is under the new urbanization background and is close to the “urbanization” mode as the better. At last, we propose the requirements and methods to apply the method, following with some recommendations and opinions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Feng K et al (2008) The theory discussion and application of urban growth boundary. Econ Geogr 3:425–429

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sybert R (1991) Urban growth boundaries. Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (California) and Overnor’s Interagency Council on Growth Management

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ding CR (2012) The theory models of urban growth boundary. Forum Planners 3(28):5–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duany A, Elizabeth PZ (1998) Time-saver standard for urban design. In: Lexicon of the new urbanism, pp 5–11

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang MH, Cou CH, Qu W (2012) The combination of “rigidity” and “flexibility”-thinking of urban growth boundary. Forum Planners 3(28):12–16

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang J (2002) American urban growth management. Foreign Urban Plan 2:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lv B, Lv QZ (2010) The technology and institutional problems for application of urban growth boundary in China. In: Planning innovation, proceedings of 2010 annual meeting of China’s urban planning, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calthorpe P, Fulton W (2001) The regional city: planning for the end of sprawl. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 304

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang RP, Zhou CS (2010) The research progress and review of American urban growth boundary. Extraterritorial Plan 11(26):89–96

    Google Scholar 

  10. Du WP et al (2009) The scope delimiting study in the less developed regions—using Woyang county Anhui province as an example. J Shandong Normal Univ (Nat Acad) 24(3):65–68

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu CS et al (2010) The main discussion of the urban non-construction land planning. Plan Des 3:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fischel W (1989) Do growth controls matter? A review of empirical evidence on the effectiveness and efficiency of local government land use regulation. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glaeser EL, Gyourko J, Sakes RE (2006) Why is Manhattan so expensive? Housing price and regulations [EB/OL], 21 Oct 2006. http://www.nber.orgpapers/w10124

  14. Casey JD, Arthur CN (2002) Urban containment policies and housing prices: an international comparison with implications for future research. Land Use Policy 19:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Knaap GJ (1985) The price effects of urban growth boundaries in metropolitan Portland, Oregon. Land Econ 61(1):26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grout CA, Jaeger WK, Plantinga AJ (2011) Land-use regulations and property values in Portland, Oregon: a regression discontinuity design approach. Regul Sci Urban Econ 41:98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips J, Goodstein E (2000) Growth management and housing prices: the case of Portland, Oregon. Contemp Econ Policy 18(3):334–344

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pendell R (1999) Do land-use controls cause sprawl? Environ Plan B Plan Des, 555–571

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arthur CN (2002) The link between growth management and housing affordability: the academic evidence. A discussion paper prepared for the brookings institution center on urban and metropolitan policy

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank to the nationally-supported projects which has helped fund, National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71373231). Thanks also to all the teachers and friends for the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

    Liping Shan & Yuzhe Wu

Authors
  1. Liping Shan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuzhe Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuzhe Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Yuzhe Wu

  2. Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University Department of Land Management, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Sheng Zheng

  3. Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University , Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Jiaojiao Luo

  4. Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University , Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Wei Wang

  5. Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University , Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Zhibin Mo

  6. Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University , Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Liping Shan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shan, L., Wu, Y. (2017). On Urban Land Development Boundary Oriented by the New Type Urbanization Policy: A Case of Yiwu City. In: Wu, Y., Zheng, S., Luo, J., Wang, W., Mo, Z., Shan, L. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0855-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0855-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0854-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0855-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation