Skip to main content

From Corpuscles to Elements: Chemical Ontologies from Van Helmont to Lavoisier

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy of Chemistry

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 306))

  • 2314 Accesses

Abstract

From a philosophical point of view, one of the more significant changes in chemical ontology from the late sixteenth to the mid-eighteenth century is the shift from a vitalistic conception of fundamental corpuscles, to a mechanistic atomism, to an operational notion of chemical elements. This essay proposes to discuss some of the key figures in this ontological shift, focusing on the ideas of van Helmont, Sennert, Gassendi, Boyle, and Lavoisier. The essay examines the relationship between the work of late sixteenth century chymists and that of the mechanistic atomists to illustrate the fact that the atomistic framework of the late seventeenth century was intimately dependent upon the earlier work of vitalistic corpuscularian alchemists and chymists. In addition to tracing the influences of vitalistic corpuscularianism on the shift to a mechanistic atomistic ontology, this essay also establishes historical antecedents, in the work of Sennert and Boyle, for Lavoisier’s operational and analytical definition of chemical elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Debus (1977), pp. 545–547.

  2. 2.

    Ibid.

  3. 3.

    Ibid.

  4. 4.

    Rocke (1984), pp. 4–5.

  5. 5.

    Clericuzio (1994), p. 53.

  6. 6.

    Ibid.

  7. 7.

    Banchetti-Robino (2011), pp. 173–186.

  8. 8.

    Clericuzio (2000), p. 56.

  9. 9.

    Ibid.

  10. 10.

    Ibid, pp. 58–59.

  11. 11.

    Ibid, p. 60.

  12. 12.

    Ibid, pp. 57–58.

  13. 13.

    Ibid, p. 56.

  14. 14.

    Ibid, pp. 58–61.

  15. 15.

    Debus (1977), p. 327.

  16. 16.

    Ibid, p. 192.

  17. 17.

    Newman (2006), p. 97.

  18. 18.

    Bensaude-Vincent and Stengers (1996), p. 37.

  19. 19.

    Newman, p. 99.

  20. 20.

    Sennert (1619), p. 32.

  21. 21.

    Ibid, pp. 99–100.

  22. 22.

    Ibid, p. 136.

  23. 23.

    Ibid, pp. 138–139.

  24. 24.

    Rossi (2001), p. 122.

  25. 25.

    Ibid, p. 125.

  26. 26.

    Ibid.

  27. 27.

    Newman, pp. 191–192.

  28. 28.

    Ibid, p. 192.

  29. 29.

    Pinet (2004), pp. 67–82.

  30. 30.

    Shapin and Schaffer (2011), p. 202.

  31. 31.

    Boas Hall (1968), p. 21.

  32. 32.

    Ibid, p. 27.

  33. 33.

    Ibid.

  34. 34.

    Anstey (2011), p. 21.

  35. 35.

    Hendry (2006), p. 865.

  36. 36.

    “De même que dans l’enfant l’idée est un effet de la sensation, que c’est la sensation qui fait naître l’idée; de même aussi pour celui qui commence à se livrer à l’étude des science physiques, les idées ne doivent être qu’une conséquence, une suite immédiate d’une expérience ou d’une observation.” [Lavoisier, Antoine-Laurent, Traité Élémentaire de Chimie, Vol. 1 (Paris: 1789), p. viii].

  37. 37.

    “[J]e me suis imposé la loi de ne procéder jamais que du connu à l’inconnu, de ne déduire aucune conséquence qui ne dérive immédiatement des expériences & des observations.” [Lavoisier, Antoine-Laurent, Traité Élémentaire de Chimie, Vol. 1 (Paris: 1789), pp. x–xi].

  38. 38.

    Ibid, p. 866.

  39. 39.

    “Si par le nom d’élémens, nous entendons désigner les molécules simple & indivisibles qui composent les corps, il est probable que nous ne les connoisons pas: que si au contraire nous attachons au nom d’élémens ou de principe des corps l’idée du dernier terme auquel parvient l’analyse, toutes les substances que nous n’avons encore pu décomposer par aucun moyen, sont pour nous des élémens.” [Lavoisier, Antoine-Laurent, Traité Élémentaire de Chimie, Vol. 1 (Paris: 1789), p. xii].

  40. 40.

    Hendry (2012), p. 66.

  41. 41.

    Ibid.

  42. 42.

    Levere (2001).

  43. 43.

    Ibid, p. 80.

References

  • Anstey P (2011) Essences and kinds. In: Catherine W, Desmond MC (eds) Oxford handbook of philosophy in early modern Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Banchetti-Robino MP (2011) Ontological tensions in sixteenth and seventeenth century chemistry: between mechanism and vitalism. Found Chem 13(3):173–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bensaude-Vincent B, Isabelle S (1996) A history of chemistry. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas Hall M (1968) History of the concept of element. In: John Dalton & the progress of science. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 21–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Clericuzio A (1994) The internal laboratory: The chemical reinterpretation of medical spirits in England (1650–1680). In: Piyo R (ed) Alchemy and chemistry in the 16th and 17th centuries. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 51–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clericuzio A (2000) Elements, principles and corpuscles: a study of atomism and chemistry in the seventeenth century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Debus AG (1977) The chemical philosophy. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry RF (2006) Elements, compounds, and other chemical kinds. Philos Sci 73:864–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry RF (2012) Antoine Lavoisier (1743–1794). In: Woody AI, Hendry RF, Needham P (eds) Philosophy of chemistry, Handbook of the philosophy of science series. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp 68–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Levere TH (2001) Transforming matter: a history of chemistry from Alchemy to the Buckyball. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman WR (2006) Atoms and Alchemy: chymistry & the experimental origins of the scientific revolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinet P (2004) La philosophie de la matière de Galilée à Newton. Rev Hist Pharm LII(341):67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocke AJ (1984) Chemical atomism in the nineteenth century: from Dalton to Cannizzaro. Ohio State University Press, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi P (2001) The birth of modern science, Translated by Cynthia De Nardi Ipsen. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennert D (1619) De chymicorum, as translated by and cited in Newman WR (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin S, Schaffer S (2011) Leviathan and the air pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Banchetti-Robino, M.P. (2015). From Corpuscles to Elements: Chemical Ontologies from Van Helmont to Lavoisier. In: Scerri, E., McIntyre, L. (eds) Philosophy of Chemistry. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 306. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9364-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics