Abstract
Etymology and semantics in India emerged, if not as linguistic disciplines then, in any case, as discernible fields of intellectual activity a propos of language, long before logic was formed. In this respect, the situation was just the inverse of that in Greece. Aristotelian logic imparted its influence to grammatical categories. In the Stoics’ tradition, logic was given obvious preference to their linguistic doctrines. Both of these facts, undoubtedly, predetermined the fates of grammar for centuries. Up to the beginning of the 20th century, and particularly with the influence of the Port-Royal logic, grammar was not a science of language as a specific object of studies, but a normative knowledge based on axioms and ways of predication of various subjects and relations. These axioms were idealized in the form of grammatical categories which were called the ‘parts of speech’. In fact, the mathematical method, through the mediation of logic, usurped the matter of language.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Ingalls, Daniel H., Materials for the Study of Navya-Nyaya Logic, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1951.
Matilal, Bimal K., The Navya-Nyaya Doctrine of Negation, Har. and University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1968.
Bochenski, I. M., Formale Logik, München, 1955.
Mamardashvili, M. K., and A. M. Piatigorsky, ‘Three Discussions on the Meta-Theory of Consciousness’ in: Works on Semiotics, v.5, Tartu, 1972 (in Russian).
Biardeau, Madelain, Théorie de la Connaissance et Philosophie de la Parole dans le Brahmanisme-Classique, Mouton & Co., Paris, 1964.
Muller, Max, A History of Ancient Sanskrit Literature,(p. 41).
The Satapatha-Brâhmana’, in: The Sacred Books cf the East, tr. by J. Eggeling, Oxford, 1882.
The Nirukta of Yaska, with Durga’s Commentary,Bombay, 1918–1942.
The Mimàrhsâ Sütrâs of Jaimini, in: The Sacred Books of the Hindus,Allahabad, 1911.
Biardeau, Madelain, op. cit.
Kashmiri Shaivism, in: The Cultural Heritage of India,vol. 3, Calcutta, 1956.
Plato’s Epistles,ed. by G. Morrow, Chicago, Illinois, 1935.
The Principal Upanisads,ed. by S. Radhakrishnan, London, 1953.
The Kashmiri Shaivism’, op. cit.,p. 370.
Heidegger, Martin, An Introduction to Metaphysics, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., 1973.
Plato’s Timaeus,ed. by A. E. Taylor, Oxford, 1962.
ashmiri Shaivism’, op. cit.,p. 371.
Raja, K., Indian Theories of Meaning,Madras, 1963 (esp. p. 8).
Pelc, J., ‘Meaning as an Instrument’, in: Semiotics, I, 1969.
Renou, L., Etudes Védiques et Paninéennes,Paris, 1955–1962.
Dumézil, G., ‘Preface’, in: M. Eliade, Traité d’Histoire des Religions, Paris, 1964.
Elizarenkova, T. Ya., and V. N. Toporov, ‘Ancient Indian ’Usas’ and Her Baltic Counterpart (Usinjs)’, in: India in Antiquity, Moscow, 1964. [in Russian]
Ogibenin, B. B., Structure of the Mythological Texts of The Rgveda, Moscow, 1968. [in Russian]
Bergaigne, K., La Religion Védique d’Après les Hymns du Rgveda,vv. I—II, Paris, 1878–1883.
Oldenberg, H., Rgveda Forschung, Berlin, 1905.
Oldenberg, H., Die Literatur des Alter Indien, Berlin, 1903.
The Principal Upanisads, op. cit.
Goldstuker, O., Panini and His Place in Sanskrit Literature; ed. by the Pâninian Office, Allahabad, 1914 (p. 170 ).
Skeld, F., The Nirukta, Its Place in Old Indian Literature, London, 1934.
Bhattacharya, B., Yaska’s Nirukta, Calcutta, 1958.
Bhattacharya, B., A Study in Language and Meaning, Calcutta, 1962.
Mehendale, M., Nirukta Notes, Poona, 1965.
Staal, J. F., ‘Indian Semantics’, in: Journal of the American Oriental Society, 1966; 86: 11–34.
Staal, J. F., Word Order in Sanskrit and Universal Grammar, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1967.
The Nirukta: Ed. with Durgâcharya’s Comments by V. K. Rajavade. Poona, 1921–26. Ed. and trans. by L. Sarup. Two vols. Lahore. See also [8].
Chakravartt, C., Sex Life in Ancient India, Calcutta, 1963 (p. 220 ).
Brown, W. N., ‘The Creation the Hyth of the Rg Veda’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 1942, 62: 85–98.
Puri, B. N., India in the Time of Patanjali, Bombay, 1957 (p. 9 ).
Ajdukiewicz, K., ‘Intensional Expressions’, in Studia Logica, XX, 1967; pp. 62–86.
Bhartrhari, The Vâkyapadiya, ed. by Snryanârâyana Sukla, Kashi Sanskrit Series, 124, 1937 (1.44).
Dumont, B., Homo Hierarchicus: an Essay on the Caste System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
Hocart, A., Kings and Councillors, Cairo, 1936.
Troubetzkoy, N., The Principles of lconology, Moscow, 1959 (in Russian).
Shastri, B. N., Critique of Indian Realism, Agra, 1964.
Schayer, St., ‘Studien zur Indischen Logik, II: Altindische Antizipationem der Aussagen Logik’, in Bull. int. de l’Acad. Pol. des Sciences et des Lettres. Cl. de philo[Cl. d’hist. et de philos. (1933 (ersch. 1934 ), 90–96 ).
Shastri, D. N., Critique of Indian Realism, Agra Universit., Press, Agra 1964.
The Mimâthsâ Nyâya Prakâsa,by Apadeva, tr. & ed. by F. Edgerton, The Yale University Press, New Haven, 1929: ‘Preface’.
Cf. Frege, G., ‘Über Sinn and Bedeutung’, in: Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, Heft I (1892), pp. 25–50.
Sahara’s Bhâsya on the Mimâthsâ-Sutras,Anandâsrama, Kâsi, 1955.
Kant, I., Critique of Practical Reason,in: Kant’s Complete Works, vol. 4, Moscow 1970; pp. 262–264. [Russian ed.]
Durkheim, E., Les Régies de la Méthode Sociologique, Paris, 1895.
Zilberman, D., ‘Hegel and MImâmsâ: The Grammar of Power’ (MS).
Kumârila Bhâtta, Slokavârttika,Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series; 2, p. 77.
Staal, J. F., ‘Sanskrit and Sanskritization’, in: Journal of Asian Studies, XXII (3), 1963; pp. 261–275.
Srinivas, M. N., Sanskritization and Modernization’, in: Ayappan, A. and Bala Ratnam (eds.), Society in India, Madras, 1955; pp. 73–116.
Lévi-Strauss, C., Structural Anthropology, N.Y., Basic Books, 1963.
Malinowski, B., Coral Gardens and Their Magic, in 2 vols., Bloomington, 1965.
Lévi-Strauss, C., The Savage Mind, N.Y., Basic Books, 1970.
Radin, P., Primitive Man as Philosopher, N.Y., 1927.
Varma, S., Critical Studies in the Phonetic Observations of Indian Grammarians, London, 1929.
Staal, J. F., Nambudiri Vedic Recitations, The Hague, Mouton, 1961.
Ingalls, D., ‘The Brahman Tradition’, in: Milton Singer (ed.), Traditional India: Structure and Change, Philadelphia, The American Folklore Society, 1959, pp. 3–9.
Dumont, L., Religion, Politics and History in India: Collected Papers in Indian Sociology. The Hague, Mouton, 1970
Staal, op. cit., pp. 87–88.
Lévy, I., ‘The Meaning of Form and the Form of Meaning’, in: Poetics, HI, Warsaw, 1967.
Zilberman, D., ‘Semantic Shifts in Epic Composition: On the “Modal” Poetics of the Mahabharata, in: Semiosis, Michigan, 1984.
Mead, G. R. S., Fragments of a Faith Forgotten, London, 1900; p. 142.
Arnauld, A., and Nicole, P., La Logique, ou l’art de penser, Paris, 1662.
vide Mehendale, M., op. cit.
Skeld, F., op. cit.
Ayer, A., The Revolution in Philosophy, London, 1956; p. 78.
Carnap, R., The Logical Syntax of Language, London, 1952; pp. 279–280.
Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations,Oxford, 1953, No. 38. e.
Ibid.,No. 108. e.
Ibid.,No. 317. e.
Quine, W. V., From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, Mass., 1971.
Kuhn, Th., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd. edn., Chicago, 1970. Appendix.
Goldstuker, O., op. cit.
Chomsky, N., Cartesian Linguistics, N.Y., 1966.
Matilal, B. K., Epistemology, Logic, and Grammar in Indian Philosophical Analysis, Mouton, The Hague, 1971.
Mill, J. S., A System of Logic, v. 1–2, London, 1843.
Frege, G., Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Breslau, 1884.
Tarski, A., ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’, in: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,1944, 4 (3).
Carnap, R., Studies in Semantics, vol. I, Introduction to Semantics, Cambridge, 1942.
Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus,Cambridge, 1922; No. 38.
Rangaswami Iyengar, H. R., ‘Diiinâga and Bhartrhari’, in: Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, n.s. 26, 1951.
Staal, J. F., Word Order in Sanskrit and Universal Grammar, Dordrecht, Holland, 1967.
Ibid.
Chomsky, N., op. cit.
Schedrovitsky, G. P., ‘Methodological Aspects of the Problem of Linguistic Universals’, in: Linguistic Universals and Linguistic Typology, Moscow, 1969 (in Russian).
Durbin, M., ‘The Transformational Model of Linguistics and its Implications for an Ethnology of Religion: A Case Study of Jainism’, in: American Anthropologist,72: 334–342.
Srinivas, M. N., ‘A Note on Sanskritization and Westernization’, in: Far Eastern Quarterly, 15: 481–496.
Orans, M., The Santal: A Tribe in Search of a Great Tradition, Detroit, 1965.
Hocart, A., Caste: A Comparative Study, London, 1950.
Faddegon, B., Studies on Pdnini’s Grammar, Amsterdam, 1936.
Mandana Migra, Brahma-siddhi,ed. by M. K. 85stri, Madras, 1936.
Wittgenstein, op. cit.
Zilberman, D., ‘Canonical Self in the World of Knowledge: An Essay in the Nyäya Gnoseology’. [This volume.]
Potter, K., The Padârthatattvanirúpanam of Raghunâtha Siromani,HarvardYenching Institute Studies, XVII, Cambridge, Mass.
Zilbernan, D., ‘On Some Epistemological Characteristic of Indian Formal Logic’, in Ingalls, D., Materials… (op. cit.)
Staal, J. F., ‘Word Order…’, op. cit.,(p. 44).
Foucault, M., The Order of Things,N.Y., 1972, Ch. 2.
Gangesopädhÿaya, Tattva-Cintâmani,vv. I—IV, Calcutta, 1888–1894.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zilberman, D.B., Cohen, R.S. (1988). The Birth of ‘Meaning’. In: Cohen, R.S. (eds) The Birth of Meaning in Hindu Thought. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 102. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1431-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1431-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7141-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1431-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive