Skip to main content

The Contributions of International Large-Scale Studies in Civic Education and Engagement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Mathematic, scientific, and literacy skills have taken center stage in the field of international large-scale assessments, and country rankings have become ubiquitous. However, three studies since the 1970s have addressed the topic of measuring civic engagement and citizenship and have examined patterns of student achievement in attitudes and skills as well as knowledge. Because of the complexity of preparation for citizenship and workplace readiness in different democratic systems, these civic education projects have had an innovative edge in both assessment development and the analysis undertaken. Results from these studies have led to insights into political events, such as the difficulty of establishing civic education after a dictatorship, the rise of anti-immigrant parties, and changes in the political participation of young adults in Europe and the United States. These studies provide information about how students are able to get along with others in society, acquire norms, and participate via democratic means to implement change. In addition to considering civic studies in an international perspective, this chapter will present results of secondary analysis of Civic Education Study data to illustrate the utility of these studies, and will discuss analysis relevant for policy and for researchers in political science and psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    No questions specific to any given country’s political structure were included in the international test.

  2. 2.

    Australia, England, Finland, Sweden, United States, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia.

References

  • Amadeo, J. 2007. Patterns of internet use and political engagement among youth. In Young citizens and new media: Learning for democratic participation, ed. P. Dahlgren, 125–146. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amadeo, J., J. Torney-Purta, R. Lehmann, V. Husfeldt, and R. Nikolova. 2002. Civic knowledge and engagement. An IEA study of upper secondary students in sixteen countries. Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnå E. 2011. Discussion. Princeton: ETS Conference on ILSAs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnå, E., and P. Zetterberg. 2010. A political science perspective on political socialization research: Young Nordic citizens in a comparative light. In Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth, eds. L. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta and C. Flanagan. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L., D. Ryan, and B. Shapiro, eds. 1989. The IEA classroom environment study. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J., I. Davies, and C. Hahn, eds. 2008. Sage handbook of education for citizenship and democracy. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldi, S., M. Perle, D. Skidmore, E. Greenberg, and C. Hahn. 2001. What democracy means to ninth graders: U.S. results from the International IEA Civic Education Study. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, C., and J. Torney-Purta. 2009. Gender differences in political efficacy and attitudes to women’s rights influenced by national and school contexts: Analysis for the IEA civic education study. In Gender equality and education from international and comparative perspectives, eds. D. Baker and A. Wiseman, 357–394. Bingley: JAI/Emerald Group Publishing. (International Perspectives on Education and Society 10)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, C., and J. Torney-Purta. 2012. Comparing the 1999 and 2009 international civic education studies of IEA: Opportunities and limitations illustrated in five countries. Journal of Social Science Education 11(1):47–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L., D. Magnusson, and B. El Khouri. 2003. Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person oriented approach. Mahwah: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, K., and T.J. Corbett. 2010. Evidence-based policy making: Insights from policy-minded researchers and research-minded policy makers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N., and G. Gilford. 1990. A framework and principles for international comparative studies in education. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. 2008. Developing students’ appreciation for what is taught in school. Educational Psychologist 43 (3): 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C., and M. Seo. 2009. Cluster analysis for cognitive diagnosis: An application to the 2001 PIRLS reading assessment. IERI Monograph Series: Issues and Methodologies in Large-scale Assessment 2: 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley, R.J. and A. Sum. 2012. Fault lines in our democracy: Civic knowledge, voting behavior, and civic engagement. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilford, D. 1993. A collaborative agenda for improving international comparative studies in education. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S., and E. Smith. 2010. Equity in education: An international comparison of pupil perspectives. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. 2009. Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husen, T., ed. 1967. International study of achievement in mathematics: A comparison of twelve countries. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husfeldt, V., C. Barber, and J. Torney-Purta. 2005. New scales for the IEA Civic Education Study Data. Retrieved from www.terpconnect.umd.edu/~jtpurta/. edu/~iea and also CEDARS CD-ROM with IEA data.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M.K. 2007. Political socialization. In The Oxford handbook of political behavior, eds. R.J. Dalton and H.D. Klingemann, 29–44. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., and R. Johnson. 2009. An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher 38 (5): 365–3779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, D., L. Sturman, W. Schulz, and B. Burge. 2010. ICCS 2009 European report: Civic knowledge, attitudes and engagement among lower-secondary students in 24 European countries. Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeTendre, G. 1998. The educational system in Japan: Case study. Washington: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. 2011. Generalizing across borders: Policy and the limits of educational seicne. Educational Researcher 40 (8): 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., H. Stattin, and D. Magnusson. 2001. Youth recreation center participation and criminal offending: A 20 year longitudinal study of Swedish boys. International Journal of Behavioral Development 25: 509–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H., K-T. Hau, C. Artelt, J. Baumert, and J. Peschar. 2000. OECD’s brief self-report measure of educational psychology’s most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing 6 (4): 311–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musu-Gillette, L. 2010. How students’ expectancies and values in math predict their choice of college major. College Park: University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2010). Exploring the intersection of science education and 21st century skills: A workshop summary. Washington: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R., and J. Junn. 1998. Civic education: What makes students learn. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, N., A. Kohut, and L. McCarthy. 1988. The press, the people, and politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, F.O., P. Bromley, and S. Russell. 2011. The valorization of humanity and diversity. Multicultural Education Review 1: 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutkowski, L, E. Gonzalez, M. Joncas, and von M. Davier. 2010. International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher 39 (2): 142–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rychen, D., and L. Salganik, eds. 2001. Defining and selecting key competencies. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W., and H. Sibberns, eds. 2004. IEA Civic Education Study technical report. Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W., Fraillon, Ainley, D. Kerr, and B. Losito. (2010). ICCS 2009 international report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-secondary students in 38 countries. Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H., L. Hamilton, B. Stecher, and J. Steele. 2011. Expanded measures of school performance. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwille, J., and J. Amadeo. 2002. Elusive and yet ubiquitous: Paradoxes and puzzles of civic education in school. In New paradigms and recurring paradoxes in education for citizenship, eds. G. Steiner-Khamsi, J. Torney-Purta and J. Schwille, 105–136. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrod, L., J. Torney-Purta, and C. Flanagan, eds. 2010. Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, D., and F. Ramirez. 2007. Human rights and citizenship: The emergence of human rights education. In Critique and utopia: New developments in the sociology of education, ed. C. Torres, 43–64. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapola, A., and M. Niemivirta. 2008. The role of achievement goals orientations in students’ perceptions of and preferences for classroom environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka, K., J. Corter, and C. Tatuoka. 2004. Patterns of diagnosed mathematical content and process skills in TIMSS-R across a sample of 20 countries. American Educational Research Journal 41 (4): 901–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, K. (2010). Politics of externalization in reflective times: Reinventing Japanese education reform discourses through “Finnish PISA success.” Comparative Education Review 54: 51–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torney, J.V., A.N. Oppenheim, and R.F. Farnen. 1975. Civic education in ten countries: An empirical study. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J. 1987. The role of comparative education in the debate on excellence. In Education and social concern: An approach to social foundations, eds. R. Lawson, V. Rust and S. Shafer. Ann Arbor: Prakken Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J. 1990. International comparative research in education: Its role in educational improvement in the U.S. Educational Researcher 19: 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J. 2008. Results of a survey of international collaborative research in psychology: Views and recommendations from twenty-six leaders of projects. In International collaborations in the behavioral and social sciences: Report of a workshop, ed. National Research Council, 64–78. Washington: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J. 2009. International psychological research that matters for policy and practice. American Psychologist, 64 (8): 825–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., and J. Amadeo. 2004. Strengthening democracy in the Americas through civic education: An empirical analysis highlighting the views of students and teachers. Washington: Organization of American States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., and J. Amadeo. 2011. An international perspective on participatory niches for emergent citizenship in early adolescence. In The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, “The child as citizen”, ed. F. Earls, 180–200. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., and C. Barber. 2011. Fostering young people’s support for participatory human rights through their developmental niches. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 81 (4): 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., and J. Schwille. 1986. Civic values learned in school: Policy and practice in industrialized countries. Comparative Education Review 30: 30–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., and B. Wilkenfeld. 2009. Paths to 21st century competencies through civic education classrooms: An analysis of survey results from ninth-graders. Chicago: Division for Public Education, American Bar Association. (http://www.civicyouth.org)

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., and B. Wilkenfeld. 2010. Experience in civic education classrooms associated with student achievement in three post-Communist countries. Paper presented at the IEA’s Fourth International Research Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, July 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., J. Schwille, and J. Amadeo. 1999. Mapping the distinctive and common features of civic education in twenty-four countries. In Civic education across countries: Twenty-four national case studies from the IEA civic education project, eds. J. Torney-Purta, J. Schwille and J. Amadeo, 11–35. Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., R. Lehmann, H. Oswald, and W. Schulz. 2001. Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age 14. Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., B. Wilkenfeld, and C. Barber. 2008. How adolescents in 27 countries understand, support and practice human rights. Journal of Social Issues 64 (4): 857–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., J. Amadeo, and M. Andolina. 2010a. A conceptual framework and multi-method approach for research on political socialization and civic engagement. In Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth, eds. L. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta and C. Flanagan. 497–523. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., J. Amadeo, and J. Schwille. 2010b. IEA study in civic education. In International encyclopedia of education, 3rd ed., 4 vols., eds. P. Peterson, E. Baker and B. McGaw, 656–662. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trzewniewski, K., M. Donnellan, and R. Lucas, eds. 2011. Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, L. 2010. Psychology and culture: thinking, feeling, and behaving in a global context. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovek, S., and S. Wessendorf, eds. 2010. The multiculturalism backlash: European discourses, policies and practices. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Hau, M. 2009. Unpacking the school: Textbooks, teachers and the construction of nationhood in Mexico, Argentina and Peru. Latin American Research Review 44: 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Davier, M. 2007. Hierarchical general diagnostic model (Research report no. RR-07–19). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkenfeld, B., J. Lauckhardt, and J. Torney-Purta. 2010. The relation between developmental theory and measures of civic engagement in research on adolescents. In Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth, eds. L. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta and C. Flanagan, 193–220. New York: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Xin, T., Z. Xu, and K. Tatsuoka. 2004. Linkage between teacher quality, student achievement, and cognitive skills: A rule-space model. Studies in Educational Evaluation 30: 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., and von M. Davier. 2008. Fitting the structured general diagnostic model to NAEP data (Research report no. 08–27). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., and J.V. Torney-Purta. 2010, July. Assessing student’s cognitive content and process skills in IEA CIVED: A cross-country analysis. Paper presented at the 4th IEA International Research Conference (IRC-2010), Gothenburg, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., J. Torney-Purta, and C. Barber. 2012. Students’ conceptual knowledge and process skills in civic education:  Identifying cognitive profiles and classroom correlates. Theory and Research in Social Education.40:1–34

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith Torney-Purta Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torney-Purta, J., Amadeo, JA. (2013). The Contributions of International Large-Scale Studies in Civic Education and Engagement. In: von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E., Kirsch, I., Yamamoto, K. (eds) The Role of International Large-Scale Assessments: Perspectives from Technology, Economy, and Educational Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4629-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics