Abstract
For Gandhi non-violence was a primary invariance principle, while for his political successor Nehru justice was so. Invariance principles signify that while everything changes in life, some laws of life do not. Consequently, these laws of life do not include a measure of error. For example, Einstein’s invariance principle is expressed in the famous equation E = mc2. Most statistical tests, including t- (and z-) tests, F-tests, chi-square tests, odds ratio tests, do not meet the invariance principle, because they apply estimated likelihoods like averages and proportions that have their standard errors as a measure of uncertainty. However, a few statistical tests use likelihoods without standard error. These tests, called exact tests, should, by their very nature, provide the best precision and sensitivity of testing. They include, among others, the Fisher exact test and the log likelihood ratio test. Particularly, the log likelihood ratio test, avoiding some of the numerical problems of the other exact likelihood tests, is straightforward, and is available through most major software programs (BUGS y WinBUGS 2011; S plus 2011; Stata 2011; StatsDirect 2011; StatXact 2011; True Epistat 2011; SAS 2011; SPSS 2011), although infrequently used so far. This chapter reviews the advantages and problems of the log likelihood ratio test, and gives real and hypothesized data examples supporting its better sensitivity. We do hope that the chapter will stimulate researchers to more often apply this test.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barnard GA (1947) A review of sequential analysis. J Am Stat Ass 422:658–64
BUGS y WinBUGS. http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs http://cran.r-project.org. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
Fisher RA (1956) Statistical methods and scientific inferences. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
S-plus. http://www.mathsoft.com/splus. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
SAS. http://www.prw.le.ac.uk/epidemiol/personal/ajs22/meta/macros.sas. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
SPSS Statistical Software. http://www.spss.com. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
Stata. http://www.stata.com. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
StatsDirect. http://www.camcode.com. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
StatXact. http://www.cytel.com/products/statxact/statact1.html. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
True Epistat. http://ic.net/~biomware/biohp2te.htm. Accessed 15 Dec 2011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cleophas, T.J., Zwinderman, A.H. (2012). Log Likelihood Ratio Tests for Safety Data Analysis. In: Statistics Applied to Clinical Studies. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2863-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2863-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2862-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2863-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)