Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Participatory Futures Research and Social Learning for Integrated Watershed Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Environmental Security in Watersheds: The Sea of Azov

Abstract

Watersheds encompass diverse social, economic, technological, and ecological systems that are interrelated in complex ways. Stakeholders in watersheds and the ecosystems that support them are intricately interconnected. Increasing acknowledgment of these interdependencies has been accompanied by widespread recognition that water management needs to become more integrated, adaptive, and participatory. But difficulties associated with stakeholder participation along with the uncertainty inherent to planning processes have hindered the implementation of Integrated Watershed Management since its conception. This chapter discusses the use of participatory futures research and social learning to actively explore watershed management issues from different perspectives and collectively set goals with diverse stakeholders. This interdisciplinary approach can improve the sustainability of management interventions and ultimately increase the longer term environmental security of watersheds. Whether it’s for strategic learning within the water sector, or facilitating genuine participation for Integrated Watershed Management, futures research and social learning are advocated as valuable approaches to involving stakeholders from the framing of problems onwards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this paper IWRM and IWM are grouped. Although practices differ slightly, both concepts rest on similar premises, namely integrated and participatory management of water resources.

References

  1. Aarts N, van Woerkum C, Vermunt B (2003) Framing planning in regional innovation networks in the Dutch countryside. Paper presented at the conference on multi-organizational partnerships, Alliances and Networks MOPAN, Glasgow, 26–28 June

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adam B (2004) Time. Polity Press Ltd, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allan T (2003) IWRM/IWRAM: a new sanctioned discourse? Occasional Paper 50. SOAS Water Issue Study Group. School of Oriental/African Studies/King’s College/University of London, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Argyris C, Schön D (1996) Organizational learning II: theory, method and practice. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aus der Beek T, Flörke M, Lapola DM, Schaldach R (2010) Modelling historical and current irrigation water demand on the continental scale: Europe. Adv Geosci 27:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beck U (1992) The risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bell S, Morse S (2003) Measuring sustainability: learning from doing. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bijlsma RM, Bots PWG, Wolters HA, Hoekstra AY (2011) An empirical analysis of stakeholders’ influence on policy development: the role of uncertainty handling. Ecol Soc 16(1):51

    Google Scholar 

  9. Biswas AK (2004) Integrated water resources management: a reassessment. Water Int 29(2):248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Busby JS, Alcock RE, Mac billivray BH (2009) Interrupting the social amplification of risk process: a case study in collective emissions reduction. Environmental Science & Policy 12(3): 297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniell KA, White I, Ferrand N, Ribarova IS, Coad P, Rougier J-E, Hare M, Jones NA, Popova A, Rollin D, Perez P, Burn S (2010) Co-engineering participatory water management processes: theory and insights from Australian and Bulgarian interventions. Ecol Soc 154:11

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dewulft A, Craps M, Bouwen R, Taillieu T, Pahl-Wostl C (2005) Integrated management of natural resources: dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. Water Sci Technol 52:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giddens A (2009) The politics of climate change. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grover VI (2006) Water: global common and global problems. Science Publishers, Enfield

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Hessels L, van Lente H (2008) Re-thinking new knowledge production: a literature review and a research agenda. Res Policy 37:740–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horn R (2001) Knowledge mapping for complex social messes. A presentation to the “Foundations in the Knowledge Economy.” David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Los Altos

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jägerskog A (2002) The sanctioned discourse – a crucial factor for understanding water policy in the Jordan River basin, Occasional Paper No 41. Department for Water and Environmental Studies, Linköping University, Linköping

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jiggins J, Röling N, van Slobbe E (2007) Social learning in situations of competing claims on water use. In: Wals AEJ (ed) Social learning: towards a sustainable world. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kauffman G (2002) What if the United States were based on watersheds? Water Policy 4(1):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keen M, Brown V, Dyball R (eds) (2005) Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kuper M, Dionnet M, Hammani A, Bekkar Y, Garin P, Bluemling B (2009) Supporting the shift from state water to community water: lessons from a social learning approach to designing joint irrigation projects in Morocco. Ecol Soc 141:19

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lach D, Rayner S, Ingram H (2005) Taming the waters: strategies to domesticate the wicked problems of water resource management. Int J Water 31:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lagutov V (2008) Establishment of the international Ural Sturgeon Park to secure sturgeon conservation and to tacilitate sustainable integrated water management. In: Lagutov V (ed.) Rescue of Sturgeon Species in the Ural River Basin. Springer: Dordrecht

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lélé S, Norgaard RB (1996) Sustainability and the scientists’ burden. Conserv Biol 10(2):354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Masini EB (2007) Futures studies from a human and social perspective. In: van der Duin P (ed) Knowing tomorrow? How science deals with the future. Eburon Academic Publishers, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meijer M (2007) Intertwining uncertainty analysis and decision-making about drinking water infrastructure. Doctorate thesis for the Engineering Management division at Delft Technical University, Delft, pp 14–15

    Google Scholar 

  29. Molle F (2008) Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: insights from the water sector. Water Altern 1(1):131–156

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mollinga PP (2008) For a political sociology of water resources management, ZEF working paper series 31. ZEF, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  31. O’Riordan T (ed) (1995) Environmental science for environmental management. Longman, Essex

    Google Scholar 

  32. O’Sullivan EV, Morrell A, O’Connor MA (eds) (2002) Expanding the boundaries of transformative learning. Palgrave, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pahl-Wostl C (2005) New methods for adaptive water management under uncertainty – NeWater project. Institute of Environmental Systems Research, University of Osnabrueck, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pahl-Wostl C, Sendzimir J, Jeffrey P, Aerts J, Berkamp G, Cross K (2007) Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecol Soc 12(2):30

    Google Scholar 

  35. Palomo I, Martín-López B, López-Santiago C, Montes C (2011) Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the doñana social-ecological system in southwestern spain. Ecol Soc 16(1):23

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rahaman MM, Varis O (2005) Integrated water resources management: evolution, prospects and future challenges. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 11:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ravetz J (2004) The post-normal science of precaution. Futures 36:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rittel H, Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Robinson J, Burch S, Talwar S, O’Shea M, Walsh M (2011) Envisioning sustainability: recent progress in the use of participatory backcasting approaches for sustainability research. Technol Forecast Soc Change 78(5):756–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Scheffer M (2009) Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton University Press, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schwarz M, Thompson M (1990) Divided we stand: redefining politics, technology and social choice. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sterling S (2007) Riding the storm: towards a connective cultural consciousness. In: Wals AEJ (ed) Social learning: towards a sustainable world. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  43. van Asselt MBA, Faas A, van der Molen F, Veenman SA (eds) (2010) Uit Zicht: Toekomstverkennen met beleid. Amsterdam University Press, Den Haag/Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  44. van Buuren JCL (2010) Sanitation choice involving stakeholders. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  45. van Looy B, Debackere K, Bouwen R (2002) Using time and social space when trying to ­innovate: acknowledging the nature of knowledge creation processes. In: Proceedings of the third European conference on organizational knowledge, learning, and capabilities, 5–6 April 2002, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  46. Verhagen J, Butterworth J, Morris M (2008) Learning alliances for integrated and sustainable innovations in urban water management. Waterlines 27(2):116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Von Harthausen A (1972) Studies on the interior of Russia. University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London

    Google Scholar 

  48. Voros J (2007) On the philosophical foundations of futures research. In: Van der Duin P (ed) Knowing tomorrow? How science deals with the future. Eburon Academic Publishers, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wals AEJ (ed) (2007) Social learning: towards a sustainable world. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wester P (2010) Making water knowledge work. Bridging the natural and social sciences. IWE Research Day 2010. Website: http://www.filedump.net/dumped/makingwaterknowledgeworkday1283179540.pdf. Visited 29 May 2011

  51. Wolters H, Ridder D, Mostert E, Otter H, Patel M (2006) Social learning in water management: lessons from the HarmoniCOP project. European Water Association (EWA) Publication, Hennef

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. KWR Watercycle Research Institute, Groningenhaven 7, 3430 BB, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

    Andrew Segrave, Chris Büscher & Jos Frijns

Authors
  1. Andrew Segrave
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chris Büscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jos Frijns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Segrave .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Modelling Laboratory, Central European University, Nador ut. 9, Budapest, 1051, Hungary

    Viktor Lagutov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Segrave, A., Büscher, C., Frijns, J. (2012). Participatory Futures Research and Social Learning for Integrated Watershed Management. In: Lagutov, V. (eds) Environmental Security in Watersheds: The Sea of Azov. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2460-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation